The Core i7-860 is due to HT and its 4 +4 cores, on average, usually before the X6 1055T and only slightly behind the 1090T. -> A slightly lower price for the platform is paid for by a little less power. Especially with support programs are not fully six cores, the i7 (P55) is better.
Antwort von Gabriel_Natas:
So, according to the CT 6 Kerner is even in front of the i7 920s multicore applications.
Antwort von tommyb:
Anandtech has the 6 Series with the x264 HD Benchmark tested. Pay particular attention should be here on the second pass as the first even on the puny processors running very fast:
Against the i860 is the 1090 front - but he had little chance with a threaded single applications:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3674/amds-sixcore-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-1055t-reviewed/7 (Single vs multi threaded a threaded Cinebench)
In the great and the whole not multithreaded Programs are sitting on a branch dying.
But what would be more interesting, perhaps: the i860 is a tiny less economical than the 1090T (180W vs. 201W for the whole system). This is, in my opinion a much more significant argument.
Time all the way: right Arschgeil's the 980X. In the same power it is almost twice as fast. The times on each case, a cool thing.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Multi-core applications go but at the moment anyway, only up to four processors, or am I mistaken?
