I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce; target reduction factor: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with ProjectX-on my hard drive.
With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners Theme-a comprehensible instructions?
Thank you Michael
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
"Hessler, Michael" wrote
> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce; > factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to > 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome. > The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with > ProjectX to my hard drive.
and what should happen so later? Which format dominates the device, d ass to play it again?
> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format > Loss of quality be achieved?
If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
Antwort von Hessler, Michael:
Hello, >> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce; >> Target reduction factor: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to >> 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome. >> The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with >> ProjectX to my hard drive. > > And what should happen so later? Which format dominates the > Appliances, d ass to play it again? Play on PC, if necessary, of Dreambox 7025
>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format >> Loss of quality be achieved? > > If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again > Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression. What software, what settings?
Have tried Avidemux, but always brings me revised target formats or Results without sound. DVDShrink I can not run, because a File Video_Ts.IFO that I do not have.
Greeting Michael
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
"Hessler, Michael" wrote
>> And what should happen so later? Which format dominates the >> Device, d ass to play it again? > Play on PC, if necessary, of Dreambox 7025
And what format mastered these devices? If I FullHD on WinXP PC with Athlon4600 (Socket 939) and CCCP and Media Player Classic will play, I have to s.and problems with Rucklern. If I SD resolution under the same conditions reflected h264 is not a problem (especially if you really just so low compressed, as you aspire to). But now I know not what they may Dreambox / mastered. Very widespread is synonymous xvid and divx, if there keien exotic settings out. Even so are so low Compression quite high image quality.
>>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format >>> Loss of quality be achieved? >> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again >> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression. > What software, what settings?
That depends, inter alia, of your operating system, money, Willingness to manual configuration and tinkering, and possibly of possible hardware. Because there are quite many variations, I can not Detailed information / recommendations.
> DVDShrink I can not run, because a File > Video_Ts.IFO that I do not have.
TS is not synonymous DVD format.
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Hessler, Michael wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce; > Factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB > To 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome. > > The files are located-as. TS geschnitten and transfer of Dreambox > With ProjectX to my hard drive.
That would mean possibly in an acceptable format convert. It offers itself. mpg,. avi or. mkv to.
> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format > Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners > Topic-an understandable instructions?
Without a clue and halfway useful results would you think if you a few euros to invest like, with the DivX Converter achieve. Easy DivX7 load times and the 30 days.
The best results in terms of quality per space is concerned, has can probably be with a H264 Compression but that includes a few Pitfalls like that it is not playable and pretty much CPU power is needed.
The factor of your target is 3-4 but synonymous with DivX or his Xvid free opponent away. DivX has the advantage of Simple configuration, Xvid is free and flexible configurable.
As Encodiersoftware can be synonymous in both the free Virtual Dub Tool use Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2 what you think in this case probably did exist.
Here is a popular link to the topic: http://german.doom9.org/
Best Regards, Andy
Antwort von Thomas Einzel:
Shinji Ikari wrote s.15.06.2009 14:38: ... >> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format >> Loss of quality be achieved? > > If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again > Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient than H.264?
Thomas
Antwort von Benjamin Spitschan:
Individual Thomas wrote: > Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient > As H.264?
Rather unlikely. Possibly. Dirac. The question is always synonymous, for which Einsatzzwechk. In the low-end, there is sometimes. Codecs, which at very low Data rates, the better to mask artifacts. Otherwise one would have to again the more experimental stuff investigate Theora etc.
Regards, Benjamin
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Andreas Erber wrote:
> Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2
The "Mod" is history, since about 3 years, reads the synonymous original VD MPEG2.
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
Thomas single wrote
>>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format >>> Loss of quality be achieved? >> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again >> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression. > Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient > as H.264?
As far as I use it as a layman and for home users personally assess I can feel H.264 (or x.264) as quite good and not knowing better. I have not synonymous, but the universal Ueberblick.
Better in terms of picture quality would possibly MJPEG or play of Vollbidlern uncompressed, but the more compression low / not present, in so far is for the task unrealistic.
It's always a compromise between (subjective) accepted Desired picture quality and compression.
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote: > Andreas Erber wrote: > >> Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2 > > The "Mod" is history, since about 3 years, reads the synonymous > Original VD MPEG2.
Maybe, but zickt the synonymous with the current version with me in MPG2 material is always around, especially for DVB-shots.
LG Andy
Antwort von Klaus Behrends:
Hessler, Michael wrote:
> Hello, > > I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce; > Factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to > 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome. > > The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with > ProjectX to my hard drive. > > With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format > Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners > Topic-an understandable instructions? > > Thanks > Michael
First you have to times it clear how long your film is or what Bitrate he has. Mpeg as you can in 3 GB in usable quality (2048 kbps) about 3 Hours bring. That makes ts with a movie easy, fast, free and reliable VLC with the option Streaming / Exporting.