Logo Logo
directory schraeg
Knowledge
Codecs· Introductions· Dictionaries
Hardware
Camcorders· Computers· DVD· accessories
Software
3D· Compositing· Download· DVD· Effects· Player· Tools· DV Editing
DV-Movies
Festivals· Films
HowTo
Lighting· script· Shooting· Filmlook· Keying· Montage· Directing· Sound· Tips
Misc
Manufacturer· Reviews· Technics
A DV(L)-FAQ [e]

DVL-Digest 525 - Postings:
Index


"Timecode"
colour space on a GL1?
Panasonic DV Cameras?


"Timecode" - Adam Wilt


> Well, there was at least one cut in the movie that was pretty
> obvious, so I wonder about the accuracy of the article.
Well, in the discussion that followed the showing I attended, Figgis said they
were all continuous takes, with no cuts. No one in the 150+ people who saw the
show spoke up to question him on this, and the nature of "4 simultaneous
shoots with no cuts" was discussed for about 20 minutes. I'm not saying that
were *were* no cuts, but if there were, then we were all blind AND we were all
led down the primrose path!
> Also, I think the CG credit said something like "shot on
> Nov.(?) xx, 1999 in 4 takes. So they could've meant
> that 4 of the 14 takes were shot on that day.
The deal was to shoot the show in the morning around 9 or 10 am. The "rushes"
would be watched over lunch, and another pass would be made around 2:30 or 3
in the afternoon. In all, there were 14 or 15 complete, 4-camera, sync-rolled
productions of the show. The 4 takes used were the four camera tapes from that
one afternoon.
There was no hard-and-fast script; improvisation was encouraged, and people
were told to wear different clothes on different days to reduce the temptation
to mix 'n' match. The "script" was written as a score on music paper, and the
only hard and fast rules were that there were certain events (earthquakes,
important meetings) that had to hit temporal marks. But with a dispersed
"set", things were bound to vary; cars could get stuck in traffic, people
could get diverted, whatever. It simply wasn't possible to mix 'n' match takes
from different shoots, because the synchronization simply wouldn't line up.
Cheers,
AJW



colour space on a GL1? - Adam Wilt


> I'm wondering what is the colour space on the analog outputs on a GL1.
On the analog outputs, it's about 4.2 MHz Y, 1.5 MHz for I & Q. It's not
sampled any more, it's merely bandwidth-limited. For what it's worth, the 1.5
MHz band limit on the I & Q signals is roughly equivalent to 4:1:1 color
sampling. Whether the signal was upconverted to 4:2:2 prior to output is not
especially relevant as it's been low-pass filtered before or after conversion
to analog to prevent ringing and other analog artifacts.
Oops, I see you spell it "colour". In that case, Perry should tell us what the
bandwidth limits are for PAL's Y, U, and V signals! I think U & V are good to
about 2.25 MHz?
When discussing analog signals with subcarrier modulation of the colour, 4:2:2
is overkill. 4:1:1 and/or 4:2:0 are well-matched at reducing data rates
whilst maintaining the colour resolution needed for analog (I notice
"analog", not "analogue", so maybe you're in NTSC-land after all, grin).
Cheers,
Adam Wilt



Panasonic DV Cameras? - Adam Wilt


> Or you could look at the latest edition of Videography (May 2000) that
> features Emmy Award Winning Videographer Sterling Johnson and the work he
> has done with the predecessor the AJ-D200.
Remember, this is the often-reviled D200: no manual gain, no ND filter. Since
this camera is obviously no good, clearly it's only the superior talent of
Sterling Johnson that allows him to get stunning imagery from it! :-)
Cheers,
AJW




(diese posts stammen von der DV-L Mailingliste - THX to Adam Wilt and Perry Mitchell :-)


Match term in Search Index:


[up]



last update : 9.Februar 2012 - 12:15 - slashCAM is a project by channelunit GmbH- mail : slashcam@--antispam:7465--slashcam.de - deutsche Version