Logo Logo
directory schraeg
Knowledge
Codecs· Introductions· Dictionaries
Hardware
Camcorders· Computers· DVD· accessories
Software
3D· Compositing· Download· DVD· Effects· Color correction· Player· Tools· DV Editing
DV-Movies
Festivals· Films
HowTo
Lighting· script· Shooting· Filmlook· Keying· Montage· Directing· Sound· Tips
Misc
Manufacturer· Reviews· Technics
A DV(L)-FAQ [e]

DVL-Digest 594 - Postings:
Index


New Sony DSR250


New Sony DSR250 - Adam Wilt


Plus it uses Sony's pro Lion batteries... records in DV
> so it will provide the touted 4.5 hours of recording on one cassette.
> With the L90 battery, you may get that on one battery too!
Indeed. I've shot all day with the DSR-500WS on one L90. It's SOOO nice not
worrying about power! I never want to go back to AB bricks after using the
Sony BP-L series.
> I don't know your definition of a real lens, but if the same plastic one
> with auto-focus from the PD150 qualifies, then yes it does.
I'm not sure where the urban legend of plastic lenses in the 3-chip Sony DV
cams comes from, but it's been kicking around for years... no truth to it as
far as I can tell (based on reports from people who've smashed theirs), though
I'm not really inclined to do a "Sex Lies, & Videotape" on any of my cams just
to prove a point...
...not that plastic lenses, per se, are a bad thing; you can do some nice
aspherics in plastic that are impractical in glass. I had a Schneider
Kreuznach aspheric WA adapter for my Nizo 6080 that was plastic; it made the
most gorgeous, rectilinear, pin-sharp pix. Also, with the right choice of
materials, you can fix chromatic aberrations using far fewer elements than if
you're stuck with crown or flint glass alone -- as Canon has shown with their
fluorite element (still glass, but tweaky glass) in the GL1 and in some pro
lenses.
Still, I remember the sh*t that was sent Canon's way in the late '70s when
they had the temerity to use some plastic elements in 35mm still camera
lenses. No one ever showed the lenses to be of lesser quality, but hoo boy!
What a stink!
> If, on the other hand, your definition of a real lens means ...real manual
> zoom like a Fujinon or Canon, then no it doesn't.
Or real manual focus (more important in my own experience; I like to prefocus
and be able to hit marks). OTOH the servo zoom ring on the PD150 & VX2000
stunned me; it's actually usable for slow creeps (gentle zooms, not
learning-challenged undesirables) and speed ramps. Will wonders never cease?
> You might want to note that they {Sony] are still using
> the 1/3" chip set, basically the PD150 in a big body...
And if the optical section is the same, Sony has severely underfiltered the
CCDs, leading to excessive aliasing on fine horizontal detail, even with the
aperture correction at minimum.
At for the 250, I'd take a long hard look at the new Panasonic before
I'd commit to the Sony. I'm eager to see the image rendering on the Panny
(Jan: will it be at IBC? DVExpo?). Besides, with Panny matrixing, I'd finally
get real reds -- not Sony orange-reds! :-)
Cheers,
Adam Wilt




(diese posts stammen von der DV-L Mailingliste - THX to Adam Wilt and Perry Mitchell :-)


Match term in Search Index:


[up]



last update : 17.Mai 2012 - 06:15 - slashCAM is a project by channelunit GmbH- mail : slashcam@--antispam:7465--slashcam.de - deutsche Version