Frage von Me:
Hello,
times I needed your help, I am looking for a MiniDVCam, price ceiling should be at 3000 EUR. Application: Indoor Shooting of meetings and events. The cases are then filmed in the intranet of the customer asked the staff available.
Figure claim is rather high. Are there any suggestions / reviews?
Thank you very much
Thomas
Antwort von prem:
??????
Antwort von steveb:
hmmmm .... since I surreptitiously feel if you could it not a little more concrete Formulierst, one you almost any camera empfehlen.Komm Trust you ... :-)
Antwort von Me:
Hello,
tja what am I to say more?
Focus is very clear image quality under artificial light. With everything else I could live.
mfg
Thomas
Antwort von beiti:
Where is the sound coming from? Certain inputs are required? (For example, XLR, line-in)
Antwort von Me:
Hello,
External sound is mixed on a Yamaha digital mixer, can then be placed in each port format.
Say the connection is erstmal no preference can be given synonymous with timecode.
mfg
Thomas
Antwort von steveb:
Hello,
tja what am I to say more?
I want to buy a car, it is important that I come to B of A and I do not want to spend more than 20000 euro ...... What should I get?
What would you answer me that?
....
What is with the connections, HD or not HD, Lowlightqualitäten how good the image quality, 1 or 3ccd, etc. ... not saying there is nothing that would more precisely what you say.
Antwort von Me:
Hello,
So then I try it once ...
the image quality in artificial light is extremely important Lowlight synonymous should be good, everything else is EGAL
mfg
Me
Antwort von Markus:
... the image quality in artificial light is extremely important ... So, the new camcorder has a manual white balance (tungsten is a very broad interpretations - synonymous tungsten and fluorescent lights are to be matched because of their usually greenish color of light manual).
But a camcorder for ¬ 3,000 has usually a manual white balance.
Antwort von Electric Nick:
SonyVX2100.
Antwort von Markus:
SonyVX2100. So I would not exactly say it, I endorse the opinion, however, it fully. Since is left with a budget of ¬ 3,000 even slightly. ;-)
Antwort von Jan:
As is mentioned almost every user in the German / Austria / Swiss video forums for non-HDV and 3000 ¬ limit the VX 2100, will be even more so if not used, there's simply nothing better for guterarbeitete 2500 ¬.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Vogt-production:
Interesting that someone who has experience mixing console, etc., has never heard anything about the owl VX2100 and present here as an intentionally ignorant tried.
Antwort von Jan:
Yes every camera has some disadvantages but in my opinion has a competitor Canon XM 2 significantly more problems with the input level, the AF or permanently posted here, "Remove the Cassette" error (which I had never thank God), what is it then for about 2500 ¬ and SD?
Yes the 20x optical zoom on the XM 2 in some situations I've liked / used, but the VX 2100 is easy for me nen Tick Automatiksicher in many areas (the highest possible / faster AF synonymous with worse light, easily best picture especially in low light for the Money. Then I have to entertain me well again with other colleagues, the filmmakers are working with the VX 2100, so far I have heard really very little criticism.
XM 2 Well I know better from the practical, da gibts sound when Slashcam even more critical problems.
VG
Jan
