| Image disturbances caused by spark plugs of mopeds?
Question of berndfux:
Oktober 2008
Hi,
I have finally something of a roller from filmed.
When the sifting of the material is s.einer my body a flickering
noticed in the sky.
Do you have ne idea where that might come?
Camera: SonyVX-2100E
I have the appropriate piece of times as an attachment is added.
If anyone knows what's wrong (broken cam, disturbances caused by electrical motor, etc ...) please answer me!
Reply r.p.television:
The flickering may actually of a poorly shielded Zündelektrik of mopeds come. Cameras often have disturbing effects of radio transmitters, radar installations, suburban railways, etc.
Hab times, for example from the roof of the Empire State Building filmed. The Picture synonymous flickered slightly and the sound sounded like Martian to broadcasting.
Reply domain:
Öters am at our "Channel mountain" with a total capacity of about 50,000 watts. It works so well demonstrated as no more electronic device, whether mobile or video camera.
But on the question hut near the walkers dine in complete silence and some of them are synonymous on brisk mobile phone masts in their neighborhood umittelbaren, which perhaps with max. 300 W send.
Reply r.p.television:
Öters am at our "Channel mountain" with a total capacity of about 50,000 watts. It works so well demonstrated as no more electronic device, whether mobile or video camera.
But on the question hut near the walkers dine in complete silence and some of them are synonymous on brisk mobile phone masts in their neighborhood umittelbaren, which perhaps with max. 300 W send.
I am then after viewing the pictures from the Empire State Building synonymous asked if the staff there not some point, a second head growing. The camera of a friend even fell out and was totally hot (!!!). My first PD150 worked flawlessly. After ten minutes she began to flicker.
Induction fields, such as the electric motor of an S-Bahn can cause a similar (although such engines actually should be shielded so that it is not the case - but the DB is pretty much everything).
Reply ruessel:
Da muss ich mal s.dieser body commend the Canon XHA1. I had a rotating camera with densely s.einen induction (molten metal), there had to be synonymous because of optical problems, the thick metal shielding removed, the camera was about 40cm higher than the actual induction coil. The pictures are great and become even on the tape was all without "holes" have been recorded.
The Separate beta camera could shield even with no decent pictures get here did not only the picture tube of the viewfinder together ....
for image
Reply r.p.television:
Da muss ich mal s.dieser body commend the Canon XHA1. I had a rotating camera with densely s.einen induction (molten metal), there had to be synonymous because of optical problems, the thick metal shielding removed, the camera was about 40cm higher than the actual induction coil. The pictures are great and become even on the tape was all without "holes" have been recorded.
The Separate beta camera could shield even with no decent pictures get here did not only the picture tube of the viewfinder together ....
Good to know. Apparently these are the SonyCams generally more sensitive than Canon in this case. I had with my Canon (XH A1 and XL H1) to synonymous now no disturbing influences of radio and radar radiation and induction fields noted. When I really professional SonyDSR-500 already.
So if you are a carrier of times, transmission tower, etc. films should provide a XH A1 in the luggage.
| |
