| Image disturbances in the burned version or a part of the calculator
Question of Detlef K.:
Juli 2007
Hello,
I have a Kotzbrockenproblem, whose cause I did not come to the tricks. So far everything ran until 4-5 months before I first saw this phenomenon.
Editing software: Ulead Media Studio 7 (NOT studio video)
Cutting Computer: 2GB RAM, AMD Sempron 3200 +
Burner: Sony Double Layer DVD
Original film (OF): Hi8 captured
Final Film (FF) as a PAL DVD 4:3 rendered
OF in any software on the SchnittPC perfectly presentable without interference in the picture flux.
FF only in the preview immediately after rendering in Media Studio faultless, with all the other video players come s.diesem PC image disturbances in (strips for fast movements in the Picture)
S-VCD burned: the same image disturbances
burned DVD: The same image disturbances
FF as MPEG2 copied to other PCs:
Representation in all media players err
Okay, I think, is Trick17 workaround. Burn the DVD content on one of the other PCs.
Puff cake: the finished film on the disc (no preference whether SVCD or DVD) has renewed the popular strip. It is synonymous no preference on which DVD player I play the discs. If at all the same.
Conclusion:
OF all the runs without errors
the FF rendered as an MPEG file will run on all computers to err on the SchnittPC
the film is nowhere burned correctly
It should, perhaps, it's always the same disorders s.genau the same positions, same as always when people walk through the picture. The errors are therefore not within the film at random to.
Since I am both file as synonymous disks on different PCs and burners and players viewed, I am baffled. I find no system for the mistake.
Theoretically, yes, I could at the gecaptureten Hi8 remain, because the error-free run everywhere. But because of 1985 is, I wanted to get the super-8-speed camera and remove him digitally clean, the sound new again to restore etc. Unfortunately, the result is worse now as the original. Despite the super-scene transitions.
Maybe times has someone with a similar problem plagued? Is it s.Rendern or s.Brennen? Some of the film before burning so synonymous of the burning software again rendered.
Thank you for your tips
Detlef K.
Reply AndyZZ:
Theoretically, yes, I could at the gecaptureten Hi8 remain, because the error-free run everywhere. But because of 1985 is, I wanted to get the super-8-speed camera and remove him digitally clean, the sound new again to restore etc. Unfortunately, the result is worse now as the original. Despite the super-scene transitions.
Hi8, there were only s.1989. Do you Video8 or even Super8 (Film).
Poste times a screenshot of your problem-flash.
Reply Detlef K.:
I already said Hi8. The Origial is super-8, which is the beginning of the 90 I already had plays on Hi8.
Do not become his home, a Picture of the disturbance of capture.
Greeting
Detlef K.
Reply Detlef K.:
for image
for image
In reality, this is worse. Can not Capture. If I capture with graphics programs, the picture behind black (probably because monitor data). If I were with the Nero Showtime capture comes out at or above a super-quality. but not the actual disorder. You need to imagine that what is here krisselig white, the film appears as black streaks.
Greeting
Detlef K:
Reply Markus:
@ Detlef K.
Your IMG links lead to a protected area of the host Web site:
ACCESS IS NOT PERMITTED
The Requested Page can not be displayed.
Reply Detlef K.:
but I see the pictures yet? have two different networks of this forum was called and immediately see the images.
Greeting
Detlef K.
Reply Markus:
Noted. For me, I hold nothing (ie, red X, and now of another PC). - Maybe yes logs, nor anybody else?
| |
