| Please newcomer to purchase - Thank you
Question of phatair:
Mai 2007
Hi,
I know that these issues probably already chewed through and through but unfortunately I have to again open up such a topic because I found no thread about this had.
I've already viewed NVGS320 and 230 in the forum and read a lot of overhead. Similarly etws on SonyHC 47E.
My question is, since I'm an absolute beginner and especially in the film wants to leave. Also on outings with friends and s.and to perhaps to celebrate. After the films, I would still like s.pc edit cut, under music, etc.
I would therefore have been good picture, the sound is not quite as important as the music is the most drübergelegt.
The difference of 230 to NVGS320 seems only the OIS -> SIS to be and the LEICA Lens -> Lens Panasonic.
Is it for a newcomer worth more because the 320 or 230 to take? The differences are quite visible if you watch the film s.TV or are they rather small when you consider it normal garnicht auffalen?
Had great if someone could help me.
Greeting
Reply Markus73:
Hello,
The difference of 230 to NVGS320 seems only the OIS -> SIS to be and the LEICA Lens -> Lens Panasonic.
Is it for a newcomer worth more because the 320 or 230 to take?
The difference with respect Lens times forget that you can not see, because if ever one existed (synonymous here was already discussed a few times). In summary, the results of various tests: The image is in the class of 3CCD Panasonic virtually identical.
OIS against EIS / SIS, which is somewhat difficult to assess. OIS works something "smooth", that is correct. In addition, the 230 in 16:9 mode has no stabilizer.
How important to you is, I do not know. I myself have the GS180 (GS230 with virtually identical). After several attempts, the stabilizer for me (almost) always off and I use a tripod whenever possible, which brings better results.
For an "I will always carefree from the hand to film" users of the OIS could bring something. Good pictures produced so synonymous but not cars. Together with the fact that a stabilizer in pans often creates more problems than it solves, the MIR was not worth the extra cost. How is this for you? No clue ...
Schöne Grüße,
Markus
Reply bluegirl12:
after I mostly without s.anfang now or probably never will with stativ movies is my stabilizer Shon very important.
've still a lot about the SonyHC read 90 or 96. Can you compare the Panasonics with yes because the have no 3CCD. Because the building is significantly worse or hardly visible?
Reply Markus73:
after I mostly without s.anfang now or probably never will with stativ movies is my stabilizer Shon very important.
If you have some claim, will you still think otherwise ;-) A stabilizer can be no substitute Tripod.
've still a lot about the SonyHC read 90 or 96. Can you compare the Panasonics with yes because the have no 3CCD. Because the building is significantly worse or hardly visible?
With the Sonyhab I have no personal experiences. As one reads, it is perfectly equivalent to (only 1 CCD, but twice as large). Lowlight The behavior should be better.
Look here, this page provides information to the aside:
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/d/Reviews&level_b=Camcorders.htm
Gruß,
Markus
Reply phatair:
certainly will sometime come a tripod:)
but thanks for the super seite echt top ... for people asking for information and many reviews are looking for ... THANKS!
| |
