|  |  | |
| Questions that arises every Beginners
Question of ttom:
Mai 2006
Hello together,
this is my first post here in the forum as a registered user, and since I am not just a newcomer here in the forum but I am synonymous with the filming, I want you right here just ask some one to ask where I found an answer niergends the board (and I have been reading about 2 months with a good deal:)):
1. I have a SonyDcr HC-24 (of course, an entry-level model) and now I have used the option of either the Microsoft Dv Video Drivers (of Windoze car if someone else is selected) or use of the SonyCam too. Gibts da difference in quality if I take the wrong, or what would you recommend?
2. Do I have never seen a camcorder of Recorded Picture and I am therefore uncertain whether the quality is "normal" or if I was wrong (do I have a bissl would have expected a sharper image, but as I said am beginner). So here's the link to a Picture time (with Sclive cecaptured, then viewed in Media Player and Screen made - without cutting or encode - Cam was bolted while on tripod)
http://s9.simpleupload.de/f01f43dbf/Unbenannt.JPG.html
Jetzt hier ein Picture das ebenfalls with Tripod gemacht wurde, ungecodet, ungeschnitten and with Media Player abgespielt wurde ( den Kammeffekt kenne ich bereits, wollt euch nur der Qualität halber das Picture zeigen )
http://s9.simpleupload.de/f454d14e7/Unbenannt1.JPG.html
Note: The pictures are with simpleupload.de been uploaded - to see full size of the image simply click on the Picture.
Now, I would be interested if the picture is normal or whether the synonymous can be improved, and how the better, because the capture is indeed no preference for Programs which are used to make that all the same. Anything else I have changed anything yet s.den clips, which are ORIGINAL
The media player is set to full display size, that is synonymous nothing changed. Should not the picture be any sharper? Or because I'm expecting too much? Or do I need only other Programs to get a good picture.
3. Because I want to play my clips on PC / projector as synonymous to SVCD / DVD s.TV, I now have the following question:
When I click on PC / projector needs I will first de interlace, right? To kucken to TV I just need to advance to SVCD / DVD format to encode to look after, that is not de interlace.
But what I must do now if I want to Looking and s.Beamer a film on DVD player. Am I right that I advance the film de interlace and then encode and then have a look, because I believe my DVD player does not support progressive scan.
4. What happens if I encode a clip in Mpeg2, for example him with TMPGenc and then s.PC Looking and. Am I then still have the comb effect or may be already set in TMPGenc.
I hope I do not overcharge with the many questions.
gruß Thomas
Reply steveb:
wants to answer some time on one.
Drivers: always better to use the Manufacturer-Drivers. XP's just the standard default (to it) times formulating quite simple.
If there are bugs with certain hardware under certain programs, which is probably greater than that of the Manufacturer and they know (sometimes fixed) is synonymous (is) just an example.
To your pictures, I can say nothing, because I know the camera. But not really looked blurred out .....( imho)
For better pictures. If the source is not so dolle, it is not synonymous with subsequent editing tools really better. For good pictures, it is always worth a good camera already synonymous ago.
Issue:
The output format is not my opinion, so important. It should stop in accordance with the normal Palnorm. I would always choose a DVD format and burn it later synonymous with good quality MPEG. Why were something like this? It is important when rendering the films set usable bit rates, so the compression does not destroy too much "."
I would not give me too many ideas about the technical details but to get an intuitive tool and cutting process so that the films, effects and rendering as a movie again. The output formats can you determine there.
I think Video Studio and Premiere Elements fairly decent. For the first practice synonymous go earlier Uleadprogramme.
And do not forget these things erstmal with progressive scan, etc.
Reply Markus:
Hello Thomas,
Ad 2
Where did you assess the Picture? On a computer monitor or s.Television? Read about this time the contribution of video recordings see s.PC monitor is well made (and Link there).
Ad 3
To view the video recordings on a DVD player or a video output device (television, projector, LCD TV, etc.) should not be the Picture deinterlacet. That's what video-output devices automatically when it is needed. Even if you look at a DVD s.Computer do not need the recordings to be deinterlacet, which makes the player software automatically during playback.
To view the video recordings as a file s.Computer (no preference whether to monitor or projector), and they must deinterlacet if the image format to be converted. You learn more about this in the article pixel aspect ratio vs. Video. Computer.
Related topic:
Deinterlace or not?
Reply ttom:
Hello,
YES sin s.PC Screen images were viewed, not s.TV. Could it be that I've made on capture something wrong? With 4.0 just got ScLive without setting captured. Villeicht because you have to set something in particular that looks better, that is, it may be that I have been at capturing something wrong? If so what exactly do I have to stop there?
gruß thomas
Reply Markus:
Hello Thomas,
I ScLive just not in front of me. But the fact is that no video recordings s.Computermonitor usually look good. That's a fact. Do you have the linked post, why is this so do not read it? ;-)
Your camcorder once Clasp s.den Television s.and the Picture judge there. Are you satisfied with the quality? Only the s.Television impression is decisive!
Reply ttom:
S.TV have just joined and tested. The quality is really excellent. At least when I connect the cam directly through the A / V Out. Shall now instructed to test times looks like when I capture to PC, then simply do uncut with TMPGenc and burn to DVD Format
gruß thomas
| |
| |
