Logo

/// 
Das Beste rausholen... Ihr könnt mithelfen...

Rausholen The Best ... You can help ...




Question of Paul:


Hello everybody,

we are 4 young people (9-11 grade) who want to make a movie for different reasons and it will take a lot of help and tips. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
Our standards are high (as synonymous else?), Synonymous when I know that we are probably unlikely to reach the conciseness of a film or commercials, which is rather a pity. For better equipment and more experience would be necessary. The actors do have talent but not much experience, the cameraman (hihi) makes as other synonymous, with his first film entitled.
We still have before to make a really good movie. If I have the paintings that are in my mind's ability to achieve, then the whole thing quite a Hammer and I'll watch if I did then can upload somewhere, and you can look at it in (is there will be free within the net, or if it : DorschTV works). The script is written, set the days of filming, the story board there in the first version, and synonymous with the necessary equipment concerned. However, I'm not quite master of this great equipment. I have 2 cameras that I'm going to use (Canon XM1 Canon MX & 630i), 's wonderful Micro (synonymous if we hardly need be), two tripods, one of which is quite staggering and not at all (literally) and a MacBook to cut.
As far as for now. Now it's something special and particularly interesting for the XM1er!
For the camera I have no sun visor. Be sure to buy more? Had there still a fitting of an old SLR camera, but does not fit on it because the lens cap. We will be filming a lot of sunshine, so I ask.
The camera has so many manual modes, but I know very little about how I can use this s.Besten. Or should I just shoot everything in auto mode? I think this is true for simple but not really good, because sometimes I need anything other than depth. Even with the exposure time and its impact in the film I need to know something more. I know this has everything from photography.
White Balance. What is'n that again? Theoretically, I already know what it is, but not what it has implications for practice for the film, and what I should note here. So far I have altered nothing in it as synonymous. You can do it all manually, or with modes such as "lights" or "light outside." So I ask for something educational about White Balance.
Since I like to have sharp images, I wonder if the auto focus is sufficient, or whether I should rather focus on themselves? I think that that represents hard, because a viewfinder so now time is not an optimal evaluation tool.
The same applies to other color synonymous. (1. That I have no glimmer of the impact, 2 that the monitor or the viewfinder is not for consideration) is sufficient.
There's still the distinction between frame and Normal. Someone told me this before. The bottom line came out, that it would be worth more in moving images, the setting is complete nonsense, but at still images already. One notices because the difference in picture quality in retrospect, when you have both versions in a movie.
What about even with the difference in image quality. I plan to film at the same time some of the scenes of Front Page and to zusammenzuschneiden them afterwards. I came up with the idea, just because we have no professional actors who can play the whole thing always the same. Why are synonymous, the two cameras is necessary.
Both devices are indeed MiniDV cameras, and I have times when the simple question, what is the difference between SP and LP, except that I can with LP recording time 30 minutes. I suspect that it comes to image quality, but I'm not sure. With the small (MV 630i), I had more time lately with the problem that they did not recognize some tapes. The error message reads something like "Remove the tape". Red text on blue background, without showing the viewfinder image. With the other camera but I could easily shoot, and then look at this again synonymous on the small, but not shoot himself. What's wrong?
Now I'm coming to the sound. I have described in the manual the difference between 12 - and 16-bit audio yet v




Reply Axel:

"Paul" wrote:
If I have the paintings that are in my mind's ability to achieve, then the whole thing is quite a Hammer

Welcome to the club, Paul Chen! Without hammermäßige scenes in the head of this Forum would be zombies ripper of orphaned or taken over. Problem: The bloody reality. Since you will have to wait a little after Hogwarts, except, well, you're Harry Potter and the snake can Language
.
"Paul" wrote:
We will be filming a lot of sunshine, so I ask.

Very problematic as DV. First video tolerate slight underexposure rather than overexposure, the second tells you your digital image, synonymous experience nothing about the imageable contrast range of DV. The stupid sun visor (the old thing does it synonymous) is your smallest problem. The contrasts are greatest. Filming only after 3 clock in the afternoon and you worried some styrofoam boards to create shadows on the face off to reflect.
"Paul" wrote:
Or should I just shoot everything in auto mode?

Would not a video-Beginners wrong, but you must then not by the cameras are too difficult lighting conditions (so) overwhelming.
"Paul" wrote:
... because sometimes I need anything other than depth.

DV makes sharp. With the chips and has less to do with the automatic. Okay, in very open Aperture, depth of field is smaller, but not enough. Long Focal? Sure, but this means Tripod. Too many shots can stand a movie look a bit stale, especially today. Emphasize the important themes better by clever lighting and screen layout.
"Paul" wrote:
White Balance. What is'n that again?

The White Balance can almost always - and it is often necessary anyway - to make the editing program afterwards. Is usually only a click away. In the recording, you should avoid inadvertent mixing of light, ie, when light with different color temperatures aufeinandertrifft what a White Balance hampered or prevented. This is one of the silly construction lights in the sunlight (rather comes as Alpenglow). Styrofoam against the sunlight reklektiert in exactly the same color.
Deliberate mixing of light would be about one - daring - an alternative to Schärfen-Untiefe/Tiefen-Unschärfe: Your main character is faced with the cold blue sky in orange Baustrahlerlicht. Could pass for an evening mood. In no case does it sitting under a tree, whose foliage will face greenish (sometimes without asking what it does). No man is thinking, "How beautiful, the leaves reflect, one thinks more" human, but the Hulk has taken off. "
"Paul" wrote:
... whether the auto focus is sufficient ... synonymous for other color ...

As I said: automatic, as long as there is no extreme situation. This is where it is relatively dark (respectively) in the fierce sun shade, then you have to focus care of hand. If that happens BEFORE the camera, very good looking and you can save time, the hardness of the camera situations, it will work even auto.



Reply Paul:

Thanks Axel! That has helped me have great views. Then I'll probably still have to find someone to Styroporhalten ...
+ + +

Sincerely,
Paul



Reply Paul:

Hello,
I am a little disappointed to get so little Answers relating to. What's going on here? Axel is the only kompetetente here? I think not. Have you no desire to help? Wrong Category? Or what is broken?

I hope for more answers :-)

Sincerely,
Paul



Reply Markus:

Dear Paul,

terrify me questions where I need to scroll down three times, just roll off. I have not read the original post simply. ;-)

To this end, perhaps a little help:




Reply Acer:

When you come so, therefore, Paul, is very intrusive and will bring you fewer responses than if you:

- Short
- Precise
- Good quality (with the problem already) deals

'd written.

If we have to chew for you your movie (do not ask me now I'm reading through, but it seems after a "how-will-I-) to make my film" sounding question, it is no longer your film, but our (although you would have to regurgitate everything then transformed into something digestible;.)

Do not take it personally, but you could erstmal "by LUGBZ" Posthelferlein.
Then you can come again and then we will help you.

Promised ...;.)



Reply Paul:

I've always had my difficulties and be brief. And if I do, means nothing. Sorry, finds himself silly, habs'd expect, but it would still cool if someone would take pity on that answer one or another question.
Sorry.

Sincerely,
Paul



Reply mint400:

Pretty much all your questions and more will be in



Reply Paul:

Thank you,
the link is great! I rumgegoogelt a lot, but there was not what I wanted. Was difficult enough at all find this forum.

Sincerely,
Paul



Reply StefanS:

@ Acer and Markus

Although I'll punch synonymous're interested in getting views on it - or answer lately prefers not an option - but I think we are doing here, "the Paul" a little unjustly.

What I see as synonymous only after I read the long text now but check out what I had initially avoided due to severe pain.

Therefore, the comment "rather short and nearly as long and stays awhile ..." Although absolutely correct, but the guys have just now time to many questions.

@ Paul

Not everyone has to answer the time, desire and know all the questions of such a mammoth, I'm not synonymous, but simply a new start times and grab me out of the catalog as follows:

Sunshade XM1:

If the hood fits the old SLR and not in the "wide angle" slips into the picture, they mount. You can always put fall back when you're done and then use the lens cap.

Manual Settings:

What prevents you to test it. Du film a something that comes close to your production (read: light, people, etc.) with the different manual settings dokumentierst clean every shot and you look at the result s.TV. Then you can decide what option you think is the desired outcome of thee shall s.besten and can work accordingly.

Depth:

You can with mini-DV avoid doing so. If you have creative work coming out of the photo area and with depth of field, you can s.Mini-DV cameras only despair.

Attempts to rethink, not to copy as often as desired Herbei "film look", but again, just use this "weakness" creatively. You now are working times in mini DV, so do not try to copy something. Do not step in it traces of others, but leave your own (but applies in principle)

"Sharpen"

If it allows the recording situation, then "walk".
Only full zoom, then make sharp, then back to the desired image, and everything in manual mode

"Frame and Normal

Leave it to "Normal" are, that is the interlaced mode, that is optimal for the output to TVs. The "frame" mode is anyway not a true progressive mode, and really cares only for stuttering and trembling images.

SP and LP

Stay with SP, the mere compatibility of tapes on the cameras because when you play and due to the larger surface tape on which is written the same amount of information (data, drop outs are called Keywords)

Sound:

Stay with 16-bit

The 12 bits of the cameras are only for people who are dubbing in the Camera ". Since you will work with PC remains at the higher signal.

16-bit - 48 kHz - 2 Tracks
12-bit - 32 kHz - 4 lanes

If you are the Abtasttiefe (x bit) with the sampling frequency (kHz y) and multiply the number of tracks, you will find that the data rate is the same for both Tone.

So, that's it

Greeting
Stefan



Reply Markus:

"Stefan" wrote:
What I see as synonymous only after I read the long text now but times ...

Yes, this insight, I am just arrived synonymous, when I read the above mammoth post. :-)

But the question is s.dieser place still open?



Reply PowerMac:

It would be good, you write out your specific questions. For your text consists largely of false claims that with the questions have nothing to do. Not wrong, what it's pragmatic about getting answers to questions.



Reply StefanS:

"Mark" wrote:
But the question is s.dieser place still open?


:-) This of you? :-)

But seriously, maybe you can tell him something of the history with the color settings - even though, since I'm not synonymous sure if I asked behind the epic story, know the right place - or relating to the boom, there's still yet determined what, right?

Greeting
Stefan



Reply Markus:

Stefan, what color do you think?



Reply Paul:

Ok, I am trying times, ask a few more specific questions.
-with the color schemes I am interested in the burning, as synonymous with the post looks like.
-a boom stand (nice name) I have not now, but another M-tripod, with which we are synonymous survive. That would be clarified.
-We do need once the sound of a panting person, and one of walked onto gravel road. How is it with the panting, instead, already clear, but you have tips how to get sound of quick steps aufnhmen can? Your running does not necessarily have to be loud, right?


At the moment, obviously, but not anymore ...

Sincerely,
Paul Pistorius



Reply jojo:

Why not just remove someone to run fast on the spot (of course at the appropriate substrate) and the whole thing.
One does not have to take of the O-Sound Recording.
Here you should be careful, however, that you absorb a few Atmos s.der location for zusammenmixt with the steps, otherwise the steps are too unnatural.

Gruß,
Jojo



Reply Axel:

"jojo" wrote:
must lMan not always the O-sound use of the recording.

You say it. Dialogues should be much better O-Tones. Include s.besten without noise, ie with a good directional microphone, ie, in mono.
The remaining mixed s.besten Paul. That is the secret of good manners. Good sound is rich s.Nuancen is clear, is clean. Stereo microphones are pulpy atmosphere, otherwise rather waste chute.
"jojo" wrote:
Here you should be careful, however, that you absorb a few Atmos s.der location for zusammenmixt with the steps, otherwise the steps are too unnatural.

Yep! Collect clean tones is the A and O of a good movie soundtrack. Unfortunately, very time consuming. Tip accompany you: Always a little recorder. Another tip: Natural sounds are not always genuine enough. Time under
"googling foley artist. Have fun!

To reduce the depth even a funny link:
http://www.35mm-adapter.de



Reply StefanS:

"Mark" wrote:
Stefan, what color do you think?


now I must fill in looking but in fact synonymous again 5 minutes before I could find the term "color" in this mammoth issue again.

Guckst here:

"Paul" wrote:
because a viewfinder so now time is not an optimal evaluation tool.
The same applies to other color synonymous. (1. That I have no glimmer of the impact, 2 that the monitor or the viewfinder is not for consideration) is sufficient.


Greeting
Stefan



Reply Markus:

"Stefan" wrote:
now I must fill in looking but in fact synonymous again 5 minutes before I could find the term "color" in this mammoth issue again.

Press M $ Internet Exlorer: CTRL + F search, can. ;-)

"Paul" wrote:
The same applies to other color synonymous.

I had to put the link in the Mammoth question Watch synonymous again, because the core of my statement above is not tapped. Apparently deals with the White Balance.

This can be easily controlled, if the camcorder has a color viewfinder and a color display. In everyday situations, which can in sunlight (1) or Glüh-/Halogenlampen-Kunstlicht (2) you have to work with the fixed values. In critical cases, or when the White Balance is to be absolutely perfect, you have to make it through a neutral white surface manual.

1) Fixed-morning to afternoon, morning and evening manual Syndicate!
2) artificial light varies depending on the output of the lamps, match in doubt manual. Fluorescent appear on video is often green, therefore, synonymous here always perform a manual white balance.

Mixed light with different color temperatures avoided at all costs! You can not match that is.

Learn More:
Movie-College: White Balance

































more topics:
Special Topics

AVI
Adobe Encore DVD
Adobe Premiere Pro
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
DVD / Blu-ray Disc
ENG
Editing
Effect
Effects
Encore
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formats
HDV
Help
Image
JVC
Lighting
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Premiere
Question
Recording
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Time
Video
Video Editing

Featuresschraeg
slashCAM
slashCAM
News
HD Camcorder database
One-on-One Cam comparison
About our tests
About us


update am 29.April 2013 - 18:00
slashCAM ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH
*Datenschutzhinweis*