Frage von M-Trax:
Hello,
advance: The problems caused by the asymetrie I know.
Nevertheless:
I have a camcorder (VX2100) and a micro phone (Videomic Rode, Aufsteckmikro), both of which which only jack. To the sound of fish should I extend the cable.
An active XLR adapter and a new Microphone come for me financially at the moment, unfortunately not in question.
There are these simple plug adapter, which adapt XLR to 3.5mm. If 2 pieces of which I would assume, one of XLR and 3.5mm on a reverse, I could go the long pathway via XLR back.
Would it work flawlessly? Or would it still requires an interfering purely draw?
Thanks in advance!
Lieben Gruß,
Basti
Antwort von M-Trax:
well, then yes you are wiring with pin 1 GND, pin 2 carries the signal and to pin 3 is synonymous with mass.
technically works without problems. However, TRS connections are in practice always something funny ...
Antwort von M-Trax:
Yes, the thing with the handle is always so ne thing, but it means fixing could get resolved or will be - I think, or was I wrong?
It's me with the idea primarily to the interference-free signal path.
Would very much like XLR equipment buy, but the moment it is unfortunately not so easy: (
VLG
Basti
Antwort von Rob65:
Or would it still requires an interfering purely draw?
Thanks in advance!
Lieben Gruß,
Basti Hi Basti,
yes, would you. The transfer is still asymmetrical.
Gruss
Rob
Antwort von Markus:
But the fact is that an asymmetrical signal is not a simple jack-XLR adapter to convert it. You need a device which can. If the signal is converted, it can be of high quality transmitted over long distances.
Conversely, the balanced signal is not synonymous with XLR jack adapter to convert into an asymmetrical, while the entire cable route to unbalanced (and thus the vulnerability would be again)! Even for this you need a device that can. Source: 3.5 mm jack extension - problem: buzz
