Frage von Eazyjd:
Hello 
 I have Adobe Premiere 2.0 Project in the "unnatural" Size 725 x 408th The video footage from an MPEG-2 the same size. Finally, the entire movie as a wmv get out. 
 Now I would have to export the following questions: 
 - The video is still heavily influenced of interlace. When exporting to wmv so I would like a deinterlacing. But unfortunately I think when you export to wmv no such option. Of course, I could predict the MPEG-2 with TMPGEnc deinterlace, but somehow synonymous premiere should have been a fitting function, or? 
 - Basic question of whether the wmv export via the media encoder is recommended regarding quality / render time? 
 - For a video of size 725 x 408 at 25 fps, bitrate is about what to choose? Are there any benchmarks? Quality should be a good one;) 
 Greetings and thanks of a prime Neuling 
 Eazyjd
 Antwort von  Wiro:

Hello, 
 WMV Export menu is top left (on the preview monitor) an option "Merge." The activate. 
 Benchmark for WMV export: width = kbit / s. 
 If no grade for the network to be like you go one step higher - so thank you 1024 kbit / s. 
 Gruss Wiro
 Antwort von  Eazyjd:

Hello 
 So, thank you times for the fast reply. 
 With the "assembly" is perfect! 
 Now I have a problem with the quality: 
 I have 1390 kbit / s elected - that is significantly greater than the width of the videos. The result is unfortunately pretty bad! 
 I've the original and the encoded mpg wmv uploaded:  
ORIGINALWMV 1390 kb / s (adobe media encoder)  Tips? Error of me? 
 Gruss
 Antwort von  Eazyjd:

Somehow, it seems to me as if the quality of the wmv encoders of adobe more "suboptimal". Can that be? Is there an alternative to directly from premiere to encode in wmv?
 Antwort von  Macmacmac:

Select the 5000 kbit / s. ..
 Antwort von  Eazyjd:

hmm ... Sure, if I screw up the bitrate, the quality is better. 
 But since the video over the network, is not necessarily the best solution. 
 I simply ask me, such as the people of gametrailers.com their own video material so small as to wmv, and the quality still remains almost perfectly. 
 eg here: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21447.html 
 Bitrate: 1045 Kbits / s! 
 Is it simply "better" wmv encoder as those of MS or Adobe premiere? 
 I'm really puzzled ... ( 
 Gruss
 Antwort von  Markus:
 Is it simply "better" wmv encoder as those of MS or Adobe premiere?
 Is it simply "better" wmv encoder as those of MS or Adobe premiere?  Loading times you like the Windows Media Encoder. Maybe it works better to do?