Frage von Proco:
Hello everybody!
Would like to edit homemade clips in PPro and AE and burn it to DVD with Encore.
Now it asks me whether I should use the so acclaimed Canopus Codec.
The present results are s.sich quite ok, but there is always a little bit better.
Thanks for your answers
Greeting
Proco
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Canopus Codec What do you think? DV or MPEG2?
For MPEG2, there was recently an article in the VAD by Main Concept and HCencoder have done well.
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von Markus:
The present results are s.sich quite ok, but there is always a little bit better. That depends on. If you for example, uses a 250 ¬-Billigcamcorder, synonymous use is a better DV codec nothing, that is, the picture is bad. ;-)
Antwort von Nightfly!:
The present results are s.sich quite ok, but there is always a little bit better.
That depends on. If you for example, uses a 250 ¬-Billigcamcorder, synonymous use is a better DV codec nothing, that is, the picture is bad. ;-) AND, of course, synonymous no better MPEG2 codec!
Nightfly!
Antwort von wolfgang:
That depends on. If you for example, uses a 250 ¬-Billigcamcorder, synonymous use is a better DV codec nothing, that is, the picture is bad. ;-) Why not? Here called the Canopus DV codec has indeed synonymous, the feature that it leaves untouched the super-white area, which will surely be recorded synonymous of an inexpensive camcorder with. With the MS-DV codec that half is cut away in any case, they lack synonymous with cheap Camocorder.
But somehow stimmts course: who pays attention to quality, will probably not have 250 euros to use camcorder.
Antwort von Jörg:
AND, of course, synonymous no better MPEG2 codec!
Nightfly! especially not the Procoder, which is superior in its current form, the current encoders at all. It is much slower, has the infamous space problems with Premiere (Express) can be 2.0 per cent in the least lessen somewhat. The hochlobenden words are just a little older, and who is not developed ....
I know the course, as a last resort, acting utterance: for he encoded with 120 kbit / s:))) better than the others, but who does that?
Use the main encoder concept is appended to the program, which is quite sufficient, especially as an encode from the timeline (2.0) thanks to the prudent development department with canopus proc is no longer possible.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Proco:
Thanks for your reply.
@ Joerg: sowas I hoped to hear.
Ne Bestätigeng wanted one with more of a clue.
So stay with the one supplied.
Can you answer me one question:
Exactly when a codec is used?
As I now understand:
Capture: No, because 1:1.
Rendering in APP () to preview: think so, since what is being changed.
Leg create the film from APP for Encore I do not understand why he
wants to render everything, yet I choose "Microsoft DV AVI" and as a compressor (which
is actually to be) 'DV (PAL) "
At Encore to create the DVD: yes indeed must be converted into MPEG-2.
Is that right so far??
Greeting
Poco
Antwort von Wiro:
Leg create the film from APP for Encore I do not understand why he
wants to render everything Hello Proco,
he should not do.
If that is the case with you, then there are 2 possibilities.
1) Under Video> New Compact rid of possibly the check mark. This could be the reason. Under keyframe and rendering the lower field must be set first.
2 you) confused mglw. the box "process is ... the media are rendered. Sturgeon do not be there turn. It is rendered only the parts where it is needed. And even if there is nothing to render the box still appears and displays that data will be rübergeschoben ".
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Markus:
... "Microsoft DV AVI" and as a compressor (which is to actually be) 'DV (PAL) " A compressor is a kind Komprimiervorlage. An AVI file can contain both compressed as synonymous compressed video data. In the case of Digital Video (DV) compression is 5:1, just like on the original MiniDV tape synonymous. The compressor "DV (PAL)" considered das
