Frage von kiteschlampe:
Hello First I would like to introduce myself, and turn hot Chris Kitefilme, previously in DV with my beloved SonyVX2000.
Try now for weeks with my HV10 around to get decent results and am now s.dem point to say that HDV for film (moving pictures) is inappropriate.
Perhaps the problem is but synonymous 50cm in front of the monitor, such as a user here so beautifully in his signature stand has.
Hence my question:
Can you please just show times, as the practitioners, professionals and specialists here?
I imagine this:
1. Capturing with xxx to note is aaa
2. Cut with yyy to note is bbb
3. Rendering with zzz to note is ccc
4. Issue xyz
Why do I call this?
After several days of filming and Capture (for cutting, I am not yet come, because my material is scrap), I believe, with HDV for this kind of shots are not properly equipped to be.
I voted for moving subjects (kiters) Schlieren, Bewegungsunschärfen, and a lubrication effect, which looks out CRUEL.
Pans attempts to avoid, or at least minimize, some zooms, etc.
Have the picture of stability, still a jerky picture.
So Please s.alle out there, but write down short times, like your work, or maybe you can indeed confirm that I am with the HDV technology because not weiterkomme.
Gruss Chris s.alle
Antwort von kleines:
I'm sorry for that, but the results of your description sounds to me as if your HV10 simply defective.
Antwort von StefanS:
Your signature is synonymous to me, however much fun :-)
Unfortunately, I'm going with your problem does not help, because I have not in the HDV world angekommen bin. This is simply an investment and moving, which I currently not covered by the budget can fund.
But times read the article on XH A1
That would be my current favorite. But, as I said, unfortunately, unfortunately. Well, I'll probably start times secretly to save :-) The thing finally awakens desires
Can it be that Canon only to the very great things "A1" writes? My venerable reflex is doing now in any case after 25 years and dozens of one thousand clicks still uncomplaining service.
But, again relating to:
Go to a dealer of your confidence. Take up a HV10 at hand and to sample some similar scenes on tape. Compare the home in peace with the outcome of your camera. That should be clear to you, whether your camera just nothing good or basically HDV recording for your situation is too early.
Under Kiten is popular Wind Birds, is this so? Du hang da dran and lets you drag (on skis or by water) or "only" Lenkdrachen?
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von Parafuso83:
See you sometime this discussion here by:
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=3283&hilight=Sch% E4rfesprung
Antwort von Markus:
I imagine this: ... Hello Chris,
in your list is missing an important aspect before item 1: Take on an HD format that synonymous with fast motion and panning provides no compression artifacts. ;-)
The Panasonic HDX200, I dare to be. That would be the next best nächstgünstigste camera in HD format.
Antwort von kiteschlampe:
Have now with a lot of sampling - trial and error - reasonably usable material.
I'm still disappointed, of that which is on the tape. For fast sports only conditionally suitable.
HDV Yes, there is perhaps a little better than DV, the difference in quality when panning but it is so great that he is all the more eye Krasser fails.
And yes, I depended s.einem dragons and get my head above water and snow out and spend a lot of time in the air.
Gruss s.alle.
Chris
Antwort von positron:
I am looking after unprocessed synonymous HDV material. Preferring synonymous with a couple of pans. So I could own impression of HDV can be.
Emergency 30 seconds I would be rich already. But if possible, with information, of whatever camera it comes.
Especially pictures of the SonyFX-1 interested me.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Do you ruellels in HDV blog.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Try now for weeks with my HV10 around to get decent results and am now s.dem point to say that HDV for film (moving pictures) is inappropriate.
I voted for moving subjects (kiters) Schlieren, Bewegungsunschärfen, and a lubrication effect, which looks out CRUEL.
Pans attempts to avoid, or at least minimize, some zooms, etc.
Have the picture of stability, still a jerky picture. With the Canon HV-10?
Hmm, c't 2 / 2007 also has a troubled, erratic and often changing the focus point AutoFocus noted also colors, blue and violet appear pink red ... and strong noise below 20 lux ..
Seems not the right device for his video movies ...
Antwort von Thomas Köln:
... Give it a few times more detail about your constellation .... Which format, which interface, which is what setting NLE ... which monitor .. what setting .... There are many sources of error mad that you really enjoy letting the can. Otherwise, the HV10 really good ... we have used a third camera and the images add almost a natlos .. slightly pop chroma ... otherwise the full automatic functions OFF!. Otherwise, the nix.
Greeting
Wolfgang
