| Canon HG10, HG20 or SonyHDR SR10?
Question by Amelie:
Oktober 2008
Hallo ihr Lieben.
After bad now, I would like a good, if not the best cam to buy. So I want HD and hard drive. In shops you advised me to HG10 and SonySR10 which seem to be comparable. Although the lens of the Canon is not as good as the Carl Zeiss of Sonysein be. Well, now synonymous came yet another competitor, the HG 20 into the "what-should-I-buy 'race. Here by chance someone knows what the difference between HG10 and HD20 (except the +20 GB of memory) is? Has anyone ever seen live, so the HG20?
So, what is added is that I have Adobe Premiere Elements 4 did, and I do not know how useful to me. Some offers of a Vegas SonySR10 program offered with, I need then? Altogether there are totally cheap deals on the internet and I will not head over heels for the cheapest decide. Can you help me?
Many greetings,
Amelie
Answer by Jan:
Carl Zeiss, the word is often talked up, but unfortunately it is in these consumer cameras around 1000 ¬ or not often synonymous significantly more expensive glass lens, which this company produces.
The companies have these optics are designed, constructed, it will but of responsible companies. Cosina is quite well known in zb Zeiss optics. This should be the manufacturers of the contract but not built Optics malign.
Even a 99 ¬ SonyDSC W 110 has a "Zeiss" lens, how much of this Zeiss lens, can a non-synonymous expert quickly guessed.
The name Zeiss is nevertheless of vendors like to put a customer into one direction, ie a sale (and that is) easier.
Yes, I've seen them live - am seller grins ...
In all relevant tests, the SR 10 clearly lost in sharpness & Lowlight Canons play in another league. The SR 11 & 12 but are higher than the SR 10th
HG 10 is probably the price crusher, a few things but they are at about 100 ¬ more expensive HG & 20 other better, there would be as:
- Higher data rate of 24 Mbit / sec (better motion representation)
- Hybrid camera - recording to SD card and HDD (HG at 10 went to the map MiniSC only photos!)
- Brighter clearer menu
- At the SW mitglieferten now is the Blu Ray supports creation
- Now you can even cut into the Camera
The SonySR 10 has a second opportunity to use the recording Memory Stick Pro Duo, which is however more expensive than Canon's SD / HC cards.
A comparison of the three models is in video zb Active:
Video Active
For me it would be immediately HG 20 - and Sony as the filmmakers - (the camera is synonymous in two colors), one of the few drawbacks would be the 24 Mbit / sec, the computer & video editing system still claim more than the old 17 Mbps sec - you need not be a new mode in the film ....
Yes, who is not a program for editing AVCHD daheim has the 500 ¬ could be costly Vegas PRO SW (some stores give unfortunately the Vegas software to amateur) have help. The included Canon program is kept simple, for amateurs and newcomers cut & no fancy user interface, but a program which may last. A large part (not the root user here), normal customers cut little or not. The show synonymous big questions in the stores, whether the customers of the MiniDV movies are not created of the Company on DVD can be brought. For DV editing pass very quickly some were ....
A good PC but it must be synonymous, since we went to the Sony AVCHD problems just as Canon is concerned.
VG
Jan
Answer by Amelie:
Dear Jan,
I am absolutely delighted of your great answer! On the website you've linked, while the HG21 compared, but your answer fully enough for me! Thank you! I will now probably decide for the HG20. It was totally informative. In the shop (shop!) You wanted me to Sonyandrehen, precisely because of the Zeiss lens ... I will have already been cut, but my computer is powerful, what about me first what has led to buying more expensive (otherwise would not be worth it so real, so my calculator that can do this) Since I'm new but I think not that I like the Vegas Pro growth needs. Thanks again for the really good, extensive and speedy reply!
You're definitely a great seller ;-)
Many greetings,
Amelie
Answer by Jan:
Thank you!
The HG 21, HG 20 with a 120 GB hard drive and viewfinders, so no big differences.
VG
Jan
Answer by AndreasF:
Hello,
a difference between HG10 and HG2x has not yet been considered.
The HG2x has a smaller filter thread (37 instead of 43 mm).
This gives the sensor is a little less light.
See synonymous fxsupport.de on HF100/10.
If you want to spend less money, then take a look at times these two links.
http://www.videoaktiv.de/200810011976/News/Editing/Sony-Vegas-Movie-Studio-9-neue-Assistenten-zum-gunstigeren-price.html
http://www.videoaktiv.de/200808261861/News/Editing/Adobe-Premiere-Photoshop-Elements-7- AVCHD Schnitt.html
cu
Andreas
Answer by Amelie:
Hello!
Oh man. Crap. Now I am confused again. Thank you for your comment. Since I really nciht much Lichteqipment can have, I am rather worried and wonder how this might come at a disadvantage. Is that significant at all? And actually is an advantage of viewfinders synonymous, right?
I let myself but synonymous easily bring out the concept! Can you help me again? Synonymous Thanks again for the links, maybe I buy really prefer an update for Premiere elements ...
Many greetings,
Amelie
Answer by Bernd E.:
... The HG2x has a smaller filter thread (37 instead of 43 mm). This gives the sensor is a little less light ...
Despite the smaller filter thread, which is not necessarily synonymous, a smaller front lens size mean, however, possess both cameras the same intensity (= widest aperture). Thus at weak lighting such as indoor both fairly similar difficulties. Any differences should be in favor of HG10 as deviant rather s.der sensor size and pixel count is.
Gruß Bernd E.
Answer by Jan:
That has nothing to do synonymous, because the sensor is a diagonal of about 7 mm, 37 mm aperture than 3.7 cm - but this should be more than sufficient to cover any loss in image quality and vignetting to have.
This is probably of the users who come from the old film. Yeah, I synonymous daily, which is a bridge camera like the Panasonic FZ 18 with its big opening immediately as the camera is rated to a small compact camera now proposes - in terms of image quality.
Is unfortunately not the case, a compact 150 ¬ clippers like the Panasonic FS 5, the FZ 18 at higher ISO values rather loose. The sensor FS 5 (1 / 2, 33) is even larger than that of the FZ 18 (1 / 2, 5 "), synonymous if the FZ 18, includes a large front lens Paarundfünfziger has. The FZ 18 has clearly more ways than one FS 5, but the basic picture quality is not better. Color Still, the image seen as synonymous.
The HG 10 has synonymous with the active video screen test (especially at low light) presents a worse picture than the new HG 21 with the smaller diameter.
The picture today is not synonymous with the big front lens made (especially when the next manufacturer to use extremely small sensors), there are numerous other factors, whether the camera is good or not good.
You must have please compare the inner life.
The weak photographs HG 21 in the video asset for me better than that of the HG 10 (with the larger filter thread) - so everyone can judge yourself.
VG
Jan
Answer by Amelie:
Hi!
Thank you, that so many are involved, I will definitely order the Canon HG20, so that I someday Pottenstein to come: D Hopefully I will einfahc nothing negative auffalen, and when, "you can do nothing" ... Thank you thank you thank you ...
Liebe Grüße
Amelie
| |
