Frage von holzbrettfahrer:
Would like to read about your experiences, because I am somewhat unhappy with the Raynox Wide Anglevon.
Have extra only 66er to put not too much to lose HD quality.
But even if eingezommt will not suffer the quality of the video with the Raynox Wide Angle einbuuuuuusen Strong: I
As soon as I zoom in deteriorating the quality of evil the way to very severe blurring when eingezoommt is.
Do you have the same problems?
PS refers to the fuzziness is not on the edges but also at the center of the lens!
Had I but for the original Canon Wide Angle to Decide?
Antwort von domain:
In essence, is a wideangle converter only for the following situation thought: if you noticed that the so-called. "Wide-setting" of the original lens is not enough, he aufgeschraubt and then immediately removed if he is no longer necessary.
Each Zoomversuch in principle deteriorating intent is a premeditated crime s.der optical quality of the original lens s.sich.
Antwort von holzbrettfahrer:
That's right, because you have absolutely right.
My problem is that, that I very much sports movies and almost at every recording s.das'm Wide Angle hardback.
Because I have often, even in his motion and thus shake the HD recordings without very wide.
Also, I am always very close s.sich moving object and, each time the driver can completely absorb.
Should I accept that for a HV 30 Consumer Camera simply is not more out. Or did the big cams have the same problems with wide angle?
Antwort von domain:
Purchase yourself a Canon original converter and you will be satisfied.
