Frage von theproducer:
Hello!
I would like to know what is to be preferred on the Bildqualtiät:
If the imagery of Full HD camcorders such as SonyHDR XR500VE
or better yet the will of a high-quality MiniDV like the Canon XL2?
Establish the price of full HD are still much cheaper than the XL2.
Thanks in advance
MfG
Antwort von Piers:
Hey theproducer,
This question comes to me very familiar?
http://forum.slashcam.de/camcorder-fur-tv-bzw-kino-vp368355.html?highlight = # 368,355 Here in your initial question you compare apples with pears.
The one came a little fuzzel thing, "one cippi" mini Optics, but suuuuper dooope Comparison with HD becomes a camera with manual operated and interchangeable Optics and Canon 3 CCD's compared in the interior. The stop is "only old-fashioned" SD.
Describe times but rather exactly what you ...
-going to do with your desire to find camera
-do with your desire to find camera can
-have a budget to work with
-what have you been employed with other Kams And now why are you looking for something else
That would make it much easier to help those willing to share their experiences with you.
To halt bleibts only the question of the motto:
Will go on vacation, looking for a car. Dear nen old Mercedes station wagon with plenty of space, or at least better nen new Porsche?
As long as we do not know, what are your priorities, it is difficult to give advice.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
The "I'm still synonymous has already asked :-(;
An XL2 can be the prerequisite to learn to work properly.
Qualitatively it is not by SD UP to Date, but she can conjure up a very good quality pictures.
.........................
But without the you know what products, scenes, objects, aka .... exactly what field you want to serve, no one can tell you what it's worth looking at.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von theproducer:
So the Hauptaaufgabenbereich the camera will be the creation of
Or shooting short films in his feature length.
So moving scenes ...
From her budget, it should, if possible (under the 5000 border, are purely for the camcorder).
I know but what you have certainly already noticed whether it is sensible to purchase a high-quality MiniDV or will be better access to a "cheaper" HDV Cam.
The movies should just have a quality to it as synonymous with film festivals
are submitting to, without sacrificing the quality seems inferior.
MfG
Antwort von Piers:
So I have in recent years, filmed with different cameras
-SonyEx1
-SonyZ7
-Panasonic HVX 200
Panasonic HVX-100
Panasonic AJD-400
JVC GY-HD-100
If you purely look at the resolution, then we might be able to see this graduation
1. SonyEX1
2. HVX 200
3. Z7
4. HD-100
5. AJD 400
6. HVX 100
Aaaaaaber: even the SD shoot with the HVX 100, or AJD 400 in 4:3 format, I would say never in terms of quality as inferior.
Sure, the mills can only SD, not HD. But if one knows the strengths and weaknesses of the Kams, one can as yet properly rausholen what.
Important in the decision to buy a camera the way, is synonymous how one might be with the handling feel of a camera.
I have decided to purchase an EX1 eg instead of a HVX 200, because I prefer lenses that are their attitudes s.der Optics himself made.
The HVX makes class picture in the DVCPro HD mode, but this funny little adjusting roller for Aperture, s.der Page of the camera is simply nothing for me.
And so I was, despite the well-adjustable optics, the JVC HD-100 is not convinced. Here I like the form factor is not easy. This is not true Henkelkam ne nor ne real Schulterkam.
Then there was the Z7. Also not a bad camera. Good handling, great idea with the double drive. Once a tape for the archive, then log for the fast and cut simultaneously recorded on CF card. Class. In addition to owning one Exchangeable camera optics. But the HDV workflow with eternal here render, render, and there is nothing for it but me. Moreover, it was only 300 euros cheaper than the narrow EX1. But the eternal HDV Gerend adds up quickly 300euro working on and I find the less practical.
I took the position, who buy a camera only to data sheet or Fremdempfehlung buys guarantees the wrong thing. The important thing is how I feel with the baby, not what someone else tells me.
But if you still want nen Tip and your budget is approximately 5000Euro, then buy the ne EX1. The hammer is a part!
Antwort von Meggs:
The movies should just have a quality to it as synonymous with film festivals
are submitting to, without sacrificing the quality seems inferior.
Inferior s.der XL2 is nothing. It provides excellent SD quality and is easy to use. Whether you need HD or not is another question ne. If your results are projected with a high resolution projector in large format, you need to include all cases of HD. The trend is towards synonymous HD. One of the XL2 equal HD camera is not cheap.
One of the benefits of the XL2 or HD XL H1 is the successor Exchangeable optics. However, the Lenses are very expensive. If you are not ready for Lenses draufzulegen again a few thousands, you're better off with a handle man to hire.
Antwort von theproducer:
Thanks again for the recent information.
I've got a question about the HD cameras in general:
Is it true that the (in moving scenes delivering unclear or distorted images, which have already read several times) that even when the DV is not the case.
What have you there for such experiences?
MfG
Antwort von Meggs:
Is it true that the (in moving scenes delivering unclear or distorted images, which have already read several times) that even when the DV is not the case.
(At normal exposure, 1 / 50) are synonymous with motion blurred images as DV. HDV is as synonymous. Perhaps it falls on HDV anymore, because the images are much sharper.
I cut just one project in which 2 Canon XL2 and the successor to HDV XH A1s were used. The final product will be DV. The converted to DV recordings of the A1s are not worse than the XM2, but usually better. Also of moving making.
Antwort von Fenek:
@ Meggs
what editing program you use?
I am a grad with Edius so than my Nachfolgerr MSP of the DV and HDV employs combine ..
Possibly there is indeed something of it once.
When I use the preset of Ruessel
www.fxsupport.de
PS:
I can report on the performance of the XH-A1 just good.
In only one I have to upgrade yet:
The sound, I like that not so very ..
Antwort von Meggs:
Premiere Pro 2.0.
The combination of 2 DV cameras for details and an HDV camera for the shot cut creates great opportunities. It is so flexible, as if you had not 3, but much more camera tracks are available. You can zoom factor of 4 to move and / or, and has so with the HDV camera always the optimal image. The workflow I've now pretty well under control. My PC does not (so much power, dual-core 2.2 GHz). I rendere the HD track with the whole section as a DV-AVI. With these 3 tracks I create the multi-sequence. About the multi-track HD is the original track. So I can cut zugüg Multicam, and change if necessary with the HD-trace the image.
