Frage von Andreas Friedrich:
Hello,
I often movies via computer and then capture the videos to your PC via Firewire (there will be an AVI) file from it.
If I, the raw material, thus nothing encoded in MPEG or so, look, yet provides everything from very pixelated. It is still DV actually much better than MPEG.
Interestingly, it is always when I play back videos, the cut back onto tape play: the camcorder is connected via the analog output s.den Television, then sees everything from 1A!
Why s.PC the quality is so bad? To fonts are pixel edges, moving images are blurred and we fully recognize synonymous with the smallest swivel interlacing.
I Use the wrong codec, gibts da best? Or it may lie s.meiner graphics card? (32MB, a few years old, no 3D accelerator, etc.)
Thanks for your help!
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Used to it. Computer monitors are not Television.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello Andreas,
I join the opinion of surreptitious Michel s.and supplements following link with other explanations:
Video recordings see s.PC-monitor does not look good
Antwort von WolfgangScherber:
I think the media player is simply wrong or asynchronously set to the graphic card ...
I join the opinion of surreptitious Michel s.and supplements following link with other explanations:
Video recordings see s.PC-monitor does not look good I can
not connect there.
The argument is with the color space, I understand but there is a monitor calibration very well, either test images or use of (the) professional accessories aside - and I do not yet speak of professional equipment for image processing.
Furthermore,) a coarse-pixeled display the video was due to the underpowered graphics card (or the above maladjusted. The Resolutioneines monitor (tube, TFT, LCD) is significantly higher than that of a PAL-tube set, an HD display is technically nothing more than a monitor with tuner, and can not therefore be 'better' show.
The argument interlaced / progressive, I can not also be considered as a monitor without any problems an exact multiple of 24p, 50i, 60i show so that it is simply not in the calculation of intermediate must be achieved. HD displays will need to work closely with this technique to minimize computation time () as wg. Asynchrony to the sound and cheaper chips.
But I like to have to disabuse ...
Among other things, the question is not yet clear whether the material appears in the original resolution or scaled coarse-pixeled.
Regards
Antwort von Alpinist:
was of me ... 'm back ;-) gepennt
--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/
Antwort von rakzak:
If I, the raw material, thus nothing encoded in MPEG or so, look, yet provides everything from very pixelated. what or how do you look at the video material? in an average program, with nem player ..?
Antwort von Andreas Friedrich:
I watch those videos with young nem powerful standalone players on, he's called "Zoom Player Standard.
I will probably replace card next time the graphics (still ne ATI (AGP 1x with 32MB SD-RAM) built in 99th
Schonmal Thanks for your answer!
Antwort von Alpinist:
I watch those videos with young nem powerful standalone players on, he's called "Zoom Player Standard. You have no chance as it was coarse-pixeled reigezoomt? Sorry, I could not resist ;-)
Have you already recorded the times on the Windows Media Player or
