Frage von curtis:
Good day!
For the expansion of our equipment, I am in search of an audio recorder for various application areas.
In some thread as synonymous with the testing of the Boss Micro are quite a few opinions on erhaschen, but still nothing solid in the hand area in which I search.
I need a digital recorder Chen, based on flash or sd card in good quality sound recording and semi-to professional standards. By this I mean reliability of the technique, good workmanship and simple to minimum levels possible with the handling of live use, for example, allow for an interview.
The subsequent Asynchronität between un Picture Sound to correct for me so far never been a problem, SMPTE via MIDI Time Code or similar are not mandatory. Much more important to me, for example, XLR Connections, multichannel recording and perhaps above all a very good Mikrovorverstärker.
To date, I have a few times with the Micro track of m-audio herumhantiert. The device I felt for price and a fairly decent size. A little bit too small and too limited in the adjustment possibilities, perhaps. Moreover, there with low levels of input such as a 86 II Beyerdynamic not cope well. The SNR was simply too low, or the preamp s.seinen limits.
About recommendations I would be pleased, the pricing framework is put up around 1000, -, but like anything. I would like to spend around the 400-500 euro
Best regards,
Phil
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Edirol
Antwort von camworks:
Marantz PMD 660: http://www.thomann.de/de/marantz_pmd_660_bundle.htm
perfect workmanship, and good levels of sound are very good. even has phantom power.
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
But the map format you need the manual, I can say. Also, the menu will be very cumbersome. Unaudited information, but reliable source.
Antwort von noch ´n Gast:
Zoom H4 or H2
Antwort von curtis:
the Marantz, I had been synonymous in the closer choice made.
4 hours duration with the battery is ok.
Has anyone experience with the Edirol and called H2 and Zoom H4?
Thanks for your answers so far as!
Antwort von Marco:
Arndt has the H4 with the bad experience that it is in battery mode, the recorded file back just delete, if the current capacity is too low and the device off.
I personally have s.H4 handling, the size, the quality of the built-Stereo Mics in relation to price and vsdie fact that synonymous Mikros which need phantom power, XLR on - or 6.3-mm jack can be connected. A real phantom with 48 volts for example, offer neither the Edirol R-01/R-09 nor the Micro track. In addition, the H4 synonymous usable as an external sound card.
Me H4 was therefore supported by price-/Leistungsverhältnis convinced synonymous if, unfortunately, only the casing is made of plastic (as synonymous with Edirol / Micro Track). If it's better to be without s.anderer job losses are made, you have my opinion already about twice the price H4 spend.
Marco
Antwort von camworks:
But the map format you need the manual, I can say. Also, the menu will be very cumbersome. Unaudited information, but reliable source. is rather cumbersome. first times I was shocked when I display the h4 seen. than with the fact the lost soundfile happened, I have the tracks re-corded ding s.thomann returned and fetched me the Marantz. I'm so happy.
Antwort von Leini:
Hello,
the lost with the sound files at the Zoom H4, according to "Canopus Forum of incompatible SD cards.
A user with Kingston card had no problems, for example.
Here is the official list:
http://www.zoom.co.jp/english/products/h4/SDlist.html
mfg
Leini
Antwort von noch ´n Gast:
I am now lucky that I have the problems other people with some parts never had, or do I particularly careful with my stuff around.
I have the H4 since November and the regular (not daily, but several times a week). The repeatedly reported problems, I can but the best will not confirm. One of my Schutzbefohlenen is synonymous thing, and also no problems with it.
The other hand - searches for the Money times comparable with the quality of this recording!
Maybe even a MD-recorder with Soundman microphones, something else let me at least for mobile use do not apply.
Halber security nor the Note (without wanting to specify): For video, I am still a young fox (synonymous if I have a few gray hairs have), the development in the area of semi-Audio since I am 25 years because my grandfather field.
Antwort von curtis:
Thank you for your experience!
I have therefore Zoom H4 and the Marantz was heard, looks like with the Edirol?
A pity that only zoom and Marantz with Batteries and Battery not with proper run at 4h aufnahme I have a nice inventory of a rotating stockpile weekend.
Has anyone of you already s.besagten devices with recordings of the aforementioned 86 Beyerdynamic done? As an attractive alternative to the price MKH416 I am of the Micro still excited so we are now two of them in the pool equipment. Only the somewhat low level, for example, was the M-Audio device is sometimes a problem.
Or has someone of you already Comparison between Marantz, Edirol and Zoom to the M-Audio made?
Thank you still,
Phil
Antwort von Marco:
"It is a
shame that zoom and Marantz Batteries only with ..." Also there are rechargeable. 6 of them and you have 3 sets (at least in the H4). That should be enough to without interruptions make ends meet.
Marco
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
I work privately with the Edirol R1 of which is a shitty meter, but this excellent converter.
And if microphones are needed, which must be fed, I use the mic preamp and get a really juicy signal into the jack from R1 and is synonymous with the best preamp levels.
