Logo

/// 
Final Cut Studio oder Final Cut HD was ist besser?

Final Cut Studio or Final Cut HD which is better?



Frage von max2188:
September 2007

Hi together,
quick question I have before me buy a Mac Pro and Final Cut to be installed on the home page of Apple, I have two versions of Final Cut is found which is better? I cut a lot of HDV material!

Thank you in advance MFG Max



Antwort von PowerMac:

As you read, but inaccurate.

There is the package "Final Cut Studio 2 (FCS =)" and the "Final Cut Express (FCE). The former is better because in the package are a lot of other professional programs. The second is just a small program with few editing features. HDV goes with them. FCS is better optimized for the Mac Pro.



Antwort von max2188:

Ah ok thank you:)

I'm still on Überlgenen if I may even buy an iMac Pro, which should run clean FC synonymous? Or do I need for HD editing megasperma Calculator? Thank you





Antwort von PowerMac:

"Pro iMac? What is that? There is only the "iMac". A good iMac, so each current is sufficient for HDV synonymous.



Antwort von max2188:

Ok without problems:)

Thank you



Antwort von ars2000:

"PowerMac" wrote:
As you read, but inaccurate.

There is the package "Final Cut Studio 2 (FCS =)" and the "Final Cut Express (FCE). The former is better because in the package are a lot of other professional programs. The second is just a small program with few editing features. HDV goes with them. FCS is better optimized for the Mac Pro.


The statement about FCE HD is not true. It is nonsense to claim that FCE in the current version only editing a small program with few features is. iMovie08 is a simple editing program (step back from iMovie HD), FCE loose fit for Semi-Pro Claims.

FCS brings with some additional programs, such as Color and Motion in particular, which are useful when they need. FCE comes with the program LifeType, with the permits can be properly and with soundtrack. All details can be found



Antwort von PowerMac:

For me, FCE is a small program. No DVCProHD, IMX no, not a professional formats, not video cards. That was not even up to the last keyframe version. There are certainly some better comparisons, but it's a start: http://www.princeton.edu/~newmedia/fcp_v_fce.shtml



Antwort von Rauschenberger:

"ars2000" wrote:


The statement about FCE HD is not true. It is nonsense to claim that FCE in the current version only editing a small program with few features is. iMovie08 is a simple editing program (step back from iMovie HD), FCE loose fit for Semi-Pro Claims.



As soon I expect my iMac, which is equipped with Ilife08, I would look at the differences between iMovie 08 and 06 and interested in what you move to the statement?



Antwort von Rauschenberger:

Addendum: If it is that iMovie 06 the preference of 08 to be 06 can be synonymous parallel iLife08 to operate?



Antwort von Waran:

"Rauschenberger" wrote:
Addendum: If it is that iMovie 06 the preference of 08 to be 06 can be synonymous parallel iLife08 to operate?


Simultaneous operation is possible. iLife08 overwrites the 06er not.



Antwort von noch n´Gast:

and should I evaluate masteries point out that FCS is running on the iMac, but not on the MacBooks, not because the graphics card have? MacBookPro is also excluded because läufts back!



Antwort von PowerMac:

Officially no, but everything except color but in fact.



Antwort von Axel:

If only the first money for a calculator is there, take a new iMac or MacBookPro. To capture a MacBook goes, only makes the HDV cut to 13 "not so much fun. And if you connect an external display, it is with the mobility pass anyway. So prefer iMac.



Antwort von Beatfabrikant:

At best a 15 inch Macbook pro. Running is really synonymous Linux version? Würd mich mal interested.



Antwort von PowerMac:

Yes clear. Just be honest I find Linux very easy shit. In the past 10 years, every year I thought again, do not be such and look at the nice open-source system with the penguin times carefully. And always the same: terribly install any hardware is not supported. And the surface. Good, you can exchange, says the Linux man But I will not change, need a top of the s.and be almost perfect. If a surface is fungible, there can be no give intuitive handling. (Great Literature of Jef Raskin about this!). Linux has a bit of construction and since the birth. I would prefer to work. Last week, first seen in the university. With candy charm. Ne surface of Aqua and Aero "inspired". But as undurchdacht Programs and some were not true. Times probably would have everything set up correctly - but apparently that gets a ten-person team in months, never really out. New kernel and something does not work.

But there are distros designed specifically for Macs, which should be quite good.



Antwort von ars2000:

"PowerMac" wrote:
For me, FCE is a small program. No DVCProHD, IMX no, not a professional formats, not video cards. That was not even up to the last keyframe version.


Sure, who needs the codecs must be put on FCS, otherwise runs on the cut side in FCE nothing different, than in FCS. Which version is it just depends entirely of the personal needs. A little editing program looks to me different than FCE.

Old versions to compare is idle. Does nothing, because nobody with a current (IntelMac) on the old PPC Programs will fall back. It is but in the nature of things that new versions feature an expanded scope. Exception, see below.

To iMovie 08 Question: retrograde step because it is in the new iMovie timeline no longer exists.




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Final Cut Studio 3 -> XXX? -> Blu-Ray
Problem mit WD Studio 2 und Final Cut Pro X
Aufnahmeeinstellungen HVR-Z5E für Final Cut Studio
New thoughts on Final Cut Studio 4
final cut studio 3 + macbook black
NeatVideo downloadlink für final Cut Studio 7
Untertitel aus DVD Studio Pro für Final Cut exportieren
HD video to Blu Ray with Final Cut Studio?
Worth doing Final Cut Studio for hobbyists?
Apple bietet Final Cut Studio wieder zum Verkauf an
Tips: 11. Final Cut Pro (X): AVCHD 1080 50p in Final Cut Pro (X) bearbeiten
7toX: Final Cut Pro 7, Final Cut Pro X conversion tool in the test
Test: 7toX XML-Konvertierungstool für Final Cut Pro 7 nach Final Cut Pro X
For easy editing of HD video: Final Cut Express or Studio?
Final Cut Studio 3 defects SD codecs -? Picture Sound offset to capture
Test: Final Cut Pro X vs Final Cut Pro 7 Rendertests und Grafikkarten
Final Cut Pro 7 oder Final Cut Pro X
Final Cut Pro 6 schneller als Final Cut Pro 7 ?
XML Exporter Final Cut Pro X > Final Cut Pro 7
Final Cut Pro
Final Cut Pro 7 to Final Cur Pro X
mp4 und final cut pro x
Final Cut Pro 8
Final Cut Pro X im Dauertest
1080p50 in Final Cut Pro 7
Arbeiten mit Final Cut Pro X































weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos



update am 26.November 2014 - 18:00
ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH
*Datenschutzhinweis*