Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: First SonyPMW-F3 Shots on Vimeo
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
At least 15k for a camera viewfinder should be s.der place. The strange position is usually found only in the semi-professional segment under 10k.
And MPEG2 Long GOP? My goodness ... what to think of everything in the world, the people at Sony really?
The Panasonic AG AF 101 can, in principle, the same has probably the better codec and 1 / 3 costs Sony. Or I do not see what?
MB
Antwort von tommyb:
Yes you do - or AVCHD is so much better? After all, MPEG2 requires less power to cut - this is very much an advantage, especially Space nowadays not cost the earth.
Moreover, where is the view finder to be? Ich finds a good thing - is not even pseudo-shoulder camera.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... AF 101 in principle is the same, probably has the better codec and cost 1 / 3 of Sony. Or I do not see what ...? It all depends on the perspective and the personal focus. The AF101 has such an inferior sensor outputs, 4:2:2 at all, not only in 8 bit RGB 4:4:4 and out, gets no external HDCAM SR recorder, can not drive servo-zoom lenses and more. Much of this is admittedly a complete overkill for many users, and then a AF101 - or NXCAM-brother of the F3 - certainly a better choice. The latter seems to me with its modular design, in any case the interesting novelty of Sony's last days for "normal" user without the last high-end specification.
XDCAM EX case is far better than is sometimes disseminated and along with HDCAM SR (for example, then immediately used as a proxy) in many places a proven and established format with s faithful workflow. Also expected to find so many buyers s.einer F3 interesting.
Antwort von Tuffy:
The PL-Mount None found interesting?
The only thing that really bothers me is the codec, the XDCAM HD 422 it would have 50mbit may well be. Perhaps they fear the competition in the home.
About HD-SDI, you can even get more out but - there are still (Sonysynonymous wanted to get to?) As recorder, then tap to a 422 10bit, I would find really exciting.
Antwort von NEEL:
The only correct acquisition currently seems to be the Nano Flash ...:)
Antwort von Replay:
The large sensor, MPEG2 and the possibility of power zoom lenses would make me fall now spontaneously F3.
However, I will not ask because I get asked to "correct" rotation corresponding film unit and wealthy private and for "half" shoot me, my two synonymous schnulligen CX115. Privately, I rather prefer the simple things that can be take lightly.
Greetings
Replay
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
@ Neel: Or a Atomos for recording - notes via HDMI synonymous to 422 in 10 bit.
Antwort von PowerMac:
We consider synonymous to buy one. Together with the Red Primes Pro-Set or a few HS Zeiss optics. A nice device, the codec is not as great. Such a recorder with HDMI 4:2:2 and 10 bit recording would be a good idea. But I'm afraid for S-LOG on Sony way it is expensive (Keywords: proprietary Recorder).
Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:
Since it will be cheaper, right on a raid, Calculator, or the like to take that Sony is not cheaper is almost unthinkable. But
despite all, a nice alternative to the RED or Alexa.
