Infoseite // Frame grabber: Canon G7 vs Leica D-Lux 3 vs. Ricoh GR Digital (1 / 3)



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Frame grabber: Canon G7 vs Leica D-Lux 3 vs. Ricoh GR Digital (1 / 3) of rob - 30 Mar 2007 13:20:00
Location scouting for the next rotation, recruitment test without DV (HD)-Cam, a digital notebook for Pleasure in excerpts determine 720P or even video snippets of the animation collect ... there are graphs for the video more use cases for an "Always-In-Point & Shoot-Photo-clippers" than at first glance. Documentary work is approaching a place like the first with the Picture and Video synonymous in the photo animation is often easier to set in motion as the video. Enough reasons, a comparison test of current Point & Shoots to dare.

full article

Space


Antwort von Karo:

Hello,

precisely the choice that I am currently employed synonymous. Class.

Could it synonymous with the tests on the volume of the cameras received? Some are very loud zoom motors.

Thank you very much.

Karo

Space


Antwort von rob:

Hi Diamonds,

Thank you for your comment.

Yes, we are (subjectively) the volume of these P & S test. Both the volume of the focus of the zoom (for the Canon G7 and the Leica D-Lux 3) as synonymous the volume of the focus (for all), we will mention.

Best Regards

rob

Space


Antwort von Wernerg:

Hello

I would be synonymous in this context of interest, what is "better" results: Films with 720 score and only 15 frames per second, or as some digicams biten: 640 x 480 with 30 frames / second.

Greeting
Werner

Space


Antwort von rob:

Hello Werner,

Thanks for your input.

In other Cams A Comparison of time difficult - but this will be available is a test video taken of the respective P & S, which are in the test. Because of the Canon G7 and 1024x768 at 15 fps as synonymous 640x480 at 30 fps can start, you'll get in Testtfeld already of the material you requested. This is available for download at - your own comparison test can be made.

Best Regards

rob

Space


Antwort von oluv:

I would have a visual comparison between the panasonic and leica interested. leica synonymous whether such a crass image integrated, all details wegwäscht? I have your "previous test" can not be found. priced and is synonymous because a huge difference.

of the data, the LX2 and d-lux3 certainly the most interesting compact cameras s.markt, synonymous for 16:9. I prune now many of my photos to 16:9 to see it on my HDTV without the margins to be able to perform. but what ultimately counts is the image quality. if I am already at ISO100 with faded details and watercolor effects must be expected, this is sad.

Space


Antwort von rob:

Hello Oluv,

Thank you for your comment.

Unfortunately, we have the Panasonic LX2 of no more in the editorial department for a direct comparison. It was also only the video quality of the LX2 tested, not the Still Image Quality:

http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Erfahrungsberichte/720p15-with-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-LX2.html

Who what where ASA noisy, should be in our picture gallery, which we publish for the test are apparent. Especially relating to noise, it is certainly a pair of synonymous give our comments. The second part of the initial results of tests with the Leica and Ricoh to the end of the week / early next week to go online.

Best Regards

rob

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash