Infoseite // Hand microphone for voice recordings (interviews)



Frage von Mardilo:


Search an affordable (under 300 ¬) Microphone that I can use for interviews. Who has experience and can help me?

Space


Antwort von newsart:

If the micro with the picture must, I recommend you the classic reporter lobe SENNHEISER MD421. The Micro is just as one of the best reportage and s.vielfältigsten usable micro. The new Micro Internet costs ¬ 333, -. I have some and would like this one for Euro 222, - sell. With pop and caste. If interested, info (at) newsart (dot) de.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

The TV can be seen very often so elongated Mikros. So one in the way I would like synonymous.

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=uoejZBSWuXk

Wants without a phantom.

9600 was ordered for 60 ¬ but was not satisfied.

Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

Do you want a good sound or even just look so good?

The 421 is really robust, has a clean sound that is relatively well protected against immune handle noise and requires no power.

Has a short Dicker (with windscreen), but of course you want the dildo-Optics.

Space


Antwort von shipoffools:

"Mardilo" wrote: The TV can be seen very often so elongated Mikros. So one in the way I would like synonymous.


If you want to film or represent yourself?
Take the MD421 is the best with what it s.Handmikros there.
... and will, inter alia, for decades synonymous of professionals in the television set.
If it's cheaper, then Take a Shure SM58. That's more of a vocal microphone, but absolutely 'unkaputtbar "and do it for your purposes probably synonymous. Or alternatively (and even cheaper with the same output, but not quite as robust) a T.bone-replica. ZBTbone MB85 beta.

Space


Antwort von mov:

The Dildo-optik "48V without you can with the Beyerdynamic MCE86 CAM erziehlen (battery powered). But then ask the elastic tube to keep using, which is usually static and micro wzischen terminal sits.

Space


Antwort von newsart:

Hello? Why is the capability a microphone here s.der Optics moored? The main difference is the sensitivity and characteristic. The MD421 is a dynamic as Microphone Cardioid / Super Cardioid. For the "dildo" microphones are condenser microphones with directivity. Where the capacitor for the micro-electricity comes (whether on Phantom of the Camera or the mixer or via Power adapter) is ultimately secondary. Both variants have their micro Einsatzgebiete (depending on ambient noise, etc.). I think only one thing - for budget reasons - can buy, one is with the universal MD421 equipped. Qualitatively lie between the MD421 and the SM58 I believe worlds.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

No. I will not even show. I wonder what this anyway "dildo" Microphones are a type?

Look like Richtrohmikrofone yes but would not be suitable for interviews.

Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

These are perfectly normal condenser microphones.
The gibts in the bay is already relatively inexpensive.
I am using Sennheiser as synonymous, and although the 'ME' series (ME 20/40/64/66/80/88).
The available with various characteristics of ball to leg
Manufacturer Others have something synonymous, of course, with other types of designations.

The capsules are sensitive to gut and can therefore, in contrast to the large dynamic as the MD421, in such a small diameter pipe to be installed.

But Rumfuchteln are not suitable.
Each noise s.Griff your finger is on the recording with it, "too loud" do not like the bumps and rough certainly not.
This tells you the sensitive membranes, a waning effect with the years after. I could not even find.

For s.hoc is what you prefer as the 421st Dynamic
To play the big boys (if you like that helps)

Jens

Space



Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Mardilo" wrote: ... a less than 300 ¬ ... ... ... Microphone for interviews ...
If you have the micro hand anyway possibly via radio link with the camera want to come this Microphone:
http://www.thomann.de/de/sennheiser_skm_135_g2dband.htm
in question. With us, it has for this purpose in any case proven.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

"mov" wrote: The Dildo-optik "48V without you can with the Beyerdynamic MCE86 CAM erziehlen (battery powered). But then ask the elastic tube to keep using, which is usually static and micro wzischen terminal sits.

http://www.musik-service.de/beyerdynamic-mce-86-s-ii-cam-prx395743580de.aspx

or do you mean? Looks good.

What do you think of the part?

Space


Antwort von masterseb:

clear: akg C1000, the classic and widespread.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

zum Bild

someone knows which coincidentally is the Micro?

Space


Antwort von masterseb:

"Mardilo" wrote: "mov" wrote: The Dildo-optik "48V without you can with the Beyerdynamic MCE86 CAM erziehlen (battery powered). But then ask the elastic tube to keep using, which is usually static and micro wzischen terminal sits.

http://www.musik-service.de/beyerdynamic-mce-86-s-ii-cam-prx395743580de.aspx

or do you mean? Looks good.

What do you think of the part?


This is a micro judge. not really suitable for interviews.

Space


Antwort von Schlafsack:

"Mardilo" wrote: someone knows which coincidentally is the Micro?

This is a Sennheiser MD 441st A really good dynamic Micro. A classic, so to speak, is synonymous for many years produced. The new price is, however, at around 700 EUR.

Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

Yes? Had I now the picture is not detected.

But interviews with a 441er to make is as if the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra Dieter Bohlen must accompany singing.

Your previous comments I understand that you have not much experience with the topic searched.
Because I would like to have some really dynamic 10,-EUR-part with the appropriate times on ebay and then shoot just trial & error. Have I done so synonymous.
Your conversation partner is synonymous so very well understood.

And if you really want both mikrofonieren, yes you can for a 40er Optics drainpipe from the building and obtain the Micro drin disappear.
But if someone is personally interviewed by the executioner wishes .....?

;)

Space


Antwort von thos-berlin:

Quote: 441 .... Had I now the picture is not detected.

The Optics of the MD 441 is unique and unmistakable ;-)

Quote: But interviews with a 441er to make is as if the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra Dieter Bohlen must accompany singing.

But it would have been the Philharmonic ever ready for other artists ...

Quote: Because I would like to have some really dynamic 10,-EUR-part with the appropriate times on ebay and then shoot just trial & error ... Your conversation partner is synonymous so very well understood.

The difference is clear and you will hear later in the Ar ... bite. A friend of me made in a local cable sports program in which he with (qualitative) interviews makes changing Mikros. Since you clearly remembers when he Mikto which he has used ...

Quote: And if you really want both mikrofonieren, yes you can for a 40er Optics drainpipe from the building and obtain the Micro drin disappear. : lol

If you are you can afford (and want), take the MD441, get in the Bay synonymous for well below 700, -. Otherwise, the MD421 as reportage classics, is much cheaper to have.

Both mics are "eierlegende Wollmilchsäue" and for (almost) every Aufnahmesituatuion use. Since they are dynamic mics without voltage constraints, the threat is never an empty Battery available or the need for phantom power.

You only need to pay attention to the connections, because both microphones with three different connections (Großtuchel, XLR and screw DIN connector) on the market. One must then, if necessary, obtain the appropriate cable or build.

Space


Antwort von WideScreen:

What I still do not understand it, is to some people, the indicative Micros are not suitable for interviews?!

In an interview just tried the O-Sound of the person to get without ambient noise. These are indicative Micros have been built, as the name says. It holds the Micro why so synonymous with the person who speaks out.

The ME80 with edible part is certainly a good choice. From $ 10 microphone, I advise strongly from. This is rausgeworfenes Money.
We use the s.liebsten SENNHEISER MKH416 but with 990 Euro is probably too expensive. But provides for a good sound without surrounding noise.

It is important that you have a mic use, but that is foam section.

See synonymous: http://www.slashcam.de/info/Sennheiser-ME-80-60992.html

Also gaining in popularity: The RODE NTG-2 189 euros

Space



Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

"WideScreen" wrote: We use the s.liebsten SENNHEISER MKH416 but with 990 Euro is probably too expensive.

Or a Neumann.
What are obvious advice for beginners?

Quote: From $ 10 microphone, I advise strongly from. This is rausgeworfenes Money.
The simple microphone that forty years ago when the purchase of a good tape dazugab, are usually of big microphone manufacturers.
Since then "Grundig" thing and "Sennheiser" is there.
Not so dolle like a 421, but always as dynamic cardioid good enough for an interview that it should look like in the Picture.
The gibts even for one euro, because of the collectors and not popular among Semiprofis apparently completely unknown.

We know so far not even where the sound then hinsoll.
Perhaps on cassette dictaphone?

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

Mic should s.Camcorders connected.

Is that of NTG-2 Rode really suited for interviews? So I have the Rode Videomic and am really happy with it but for the interview is useless.

Does the NGT-2 is not a similar pattern as the Videomic?

Space


Antwort von WideScreen:

Piller @ male

Yes you are right. Only it is not always easy to find out what is good and what is not. Is much synonymous China garbage for $ 10 at Ebay.

I know the 412 is a little überdiminsioniert für nen Beginners. That, I said yes synonymous. As you can read, I become a ME80 or Rohde .... Not to be nem 412er ...

But Rohde is "cheap" and what is good. And yes, he wanted to remain below 300 euros and "look good" so it must be synonymous. * * schmunzel

@ Mardilo:
What did the Videomic characteristic for ne? What bothers you then? Need more input:) (but that is not synonymous hand microphone .....)

You want to but because during an interview in the hand or hold? Or should the camera to be attached? (would not be a good idea)

Space


Antwort von Johannes:

I have my Sennheiser e815 purchased. It costs 40 euros is extremely stable and the sound is super. For the beginning exactly the right and then you can still do a better buy, but for the beginning you can say nothing against.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

"WideScreen" wrote: Piller @ male

Yes you are right. Only it is not always easy to find out what is good and what is not. Is much synonymous China garbage for $ 10 at Ebay.

I know the 412 is a little überdiminsioniert für nen Beginners. That, I said yes synonymous. As you can read, I become a ME80 or Rohde .... Not to be nem 412er ...

But Rohde is "cheap" and what is good. And yes, he wanted to remain below 300 euros and "look good" so it must be synonymous. * * schmunzel

@ Mardilo:
What did the Videomic characteristic for ne? What bothers you then? Need more input:) (but that is not synonymous hand microphone .....)

You want to but because during an interview in the hand or hold? Or should the camera to be attached? (would not be a good idea)


As for the Rode Videomic for a pattern I know, unfortunately, has not synonymous.

Yes, I would like a Microphone in hand.

The ME-66 because I have still a Power adapter to buy?

The Rode Videomic is just a pure Videomic.
It captures all the sounds in the environment.

The camcorder is just the right but not for an interview.

Space


Antwort von Johannes:

"Mardilo" wrote:
The ME-66 because I have still a Power adapter to buy?
...


Exactly,
in addition, I currently sell the ME67 is a very ähnlig the ME66, I know even a little better.

Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

Yes yes, I come but well over 300 ¬. So 300 ¬ is really the highest pain threshold.

Space


Antwort von WideScreen:

The ME66 with Power adapter and windscreen comes in the set for 330 euro.
The higher the directivity of the more expensive ....

Space


Antwort von joerg-emil:

Hi,

I think NEN interview with hand-held microphone is really the easiest task for a microphone at all, because the distance to the person is minimal. None In other situation you need to less ensured. To handle the noise will be minimized, there should be a solid metal housing and have to minimize ambient noise dynamic microphones are very good. I've been using for years with a dynamic micro metal housing and kidney characteristics (Behringer) is actually a mediocre vocal microphone (50 EUR).

In every other situation, whether it be for Atmo, choir, theater, instrument or voice recording, it is significantly harder to find suitable microphones. This is synonymous very expensive very quickly if we wish to achieve good results.

Since I assume that now superprofessionell not work, do yourself the favor and Retractable your Euros in a professional hand-held microphone, I think they are far better job s.anderer repealed. For the money already get decent Tripod NEN, NEN very good head light or even ne Stadicam ....

Space



Space


Antwort von Mardilo:

I've spent the Senheiser 421 of newsart purchased.

From the Optics course, it is not just a hit but I think the rest convinced that even more.

Thank you for the many replies.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash