Frage von Jan:
404ERR
Antwort von C.I.W:
This is something I have noticed synonymous. The outcome of Stiftung Warentest should not be trusted.
Antwort von camworks:
why the camera is, according to your signature but eh total wurscht.
/ irony off ;-)
apart from the Stiftung Warentest really very many areas of zero ahnung.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Good is good and nice but if interested now? Or what is the problem? And everybody should probably be clear in relation to Ritsch Ratsch cameras perfectly with the Canon IXUS and Powershot ruled the scene .....
Look left Sieftung goods test is a "Housewives" seal and if you are synonymous to s.and matters vernümpftig "test is one such test statistics always with caution, or?
Ordinary citizens with no time / interest for / has s.weiteren searches. He is satisfied with something. So gehts halt nothing else.
Just as it camworks said ... s.Popo but can you go along.
Is the way and finished .... what meinste how many times I have had to listen to ja ne EOS 5 D is better than, for example, a 400D and I use it is still 80 percent of my work is EOS 1 or 600 with nix D film SLR, then I do anyway just as a reaction Kopfschüttteln . Otto So let's see you try to believe everything ;-) But you are otherwise not so in your manifestations predisposed Jan ;-) Alla machs good and the weather is synonymous better soon ;-)
Antwort von chris67:
Each company has its strengths in smaller video, Canon 860, it is possible, eg 60 P to create 320x240 videos. This justifies but not significantly better compared to video assessment Casio V 8 (and you know I'm not a Casio friend!). I have no idea what was in one test, but definitely not the normal convincing arguments .....
VG
Jan The medium of video but you should leave the VideoCams. They can simply better. Can you even when DigiCam of video or talk yet more about moving images?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... the current Stiftung Warentest shoots the bird, so much incompetence, I have not seen ... That is why I for many years, no tests of this foundation to read more. The camera tests were decades ago as a regular free of skill, photo journals that they be happy and with pleasure zerpflückt have.
If I tests of equipment that I know very well that a lot of mistakes stumble, then I trust the testers are not synonymous, if they pushchair or steam cookers check. That's a shame, but the camera tests of the Stiftung Warentest suck apparently synonymous today only for amusement.
Gruß Bernd E.
