Frage von Gerold111:
Hello,
I have a company for a meeting with about 150 participants in a 4 *- hotel filmed. The event went all day: the arrival, lectures, food, small interviews, etc.
Now should I make it a 5-10 minute clip cut. The problem is that I, as a global piece of music should use well-known hit!
Gema I have the problem at the company s.Telefon approached me and said that had no preference, because it is not published.
The clip should s.alle but participants will be sent!
Is there a possibility that I could legally withdraw from the responsibility? Some with a contract or something?
Thanks & Regards, Gerold:)
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Moin,
www.gema.de according to the nearest office of the GEMA, look, there Call to advise you.
The people distributing s.150 should apply as a commercial use that will not go for free. GEMA will send you an offer provides for the use and tells you whether you synonymous with the agreement of the rights holder for the use of need.
The company in writing of the facts in respect thereof. Since it is a commercial use, must stand for exactly. You're only "agent".
Regards
Christian
Antwort von Flati:
Famous Hits:
Even if you just need to customize a copy you already have the approval of the rights-holder (and you should get it, then you move per minute in the middle 4-makers of their own).
The Gemafreigabe requires advance that you enclose a proof of the rights clearance confirmed. Previously, a meaningless Gemaanmeldung eh. It is irrelevant whether it is 2 Private commercial DVDs, or 100 applies. That makes all the appropriate fee due to the felt.
The process itself remains the same.
Here you can find with whom you are about the rights have to be in touch:
http://mgonline.gema.de/werke/
Antwort von Kar.El.Gott:
Blöderweise is always the one who copied the DVD is a fool ...
The film, you can easily with Music gema-agent cut.
I prefer myself to such orders as the affair that I only calculate the service and a DVD the data. On the invoice, the text that this DVD without obtaining the rights are not published and may not be reproduced.
In order to reproduce the client needs to worry about.
Antwort von Gerold111:
Ok, it is synonymous not yet sure whether the reproduction I assume the DVD ...
In other words, if I have only one copy and deliver on the bill note that this DVD without obtaining the rights are not published and may be duplicated, then I am safe on the Page?
That would be me of course, quite right ...
Thanks for the replies, Gerold:)
Antwort von Pianist:
In other words, if I have only one copy and deliver on the bill note that this DVD without obtaining the rights are not published and may be duplicated, then I am safe on the Page? No, unfortunately this information is incorrect. Before you have your film with a musical work can connect, you need to permission from the copyright holder of musical works. This is especially in the field of popular music are often not given. And if they do, then only with high costs.
Matthias
Antwort von WeiZen:
Keyword Syncrechte
The right to the title ever in the movie used to be.
Rights clearance in the 5-digit field
Antwort von Gerold111:
Ok,
could it not do so that I irgentwie responsibility s.den client / company picture?
The signs Auftrgageber me something? A contract or a declaration, so I legally on the safe side I?
Regards, Gerold:)
Antwort von Pianist:
The signs Auftrgageber me something? A contract or a declaration, so I legally on the safe side I? No, this responsibility can not you leave off. If you produce a movie, you need as a film producer in the possession of all necessary rights.
Matthias
Antwort von megalutzi:
Hello,
the only thing you can do:
You can customize the music for the film cut to fit, then you deliver the film without music and from the company because the music is drunterlegen.
Can you prove that you have the movie without music delivered, then you are legally synonymous with the trimmer, the company gets the problem.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
I prefer myself to such orders as the affair that I only calculate the service and a DVD the data. Thus, you're
maybe going GEMA. The rights holder can you still drankriegen: it never goes for music reproduction only,
the rights are already in use. This is not any use to private use meant.
Your practice is extremely dangerous (what money is concerned). If one of your entities in litigation proceedings, so this is already with considerable costs before Rechteeinhaber (usually the music label of the artist) ever learn your name. This costs the client gets in the way of recourse once again with you (now means: before you label the music totally ruined).
As I always say, GEMA has rights in the chain nor the cheapest ...
BG
Andreas
Antwort von chrisl:
What is the matter because, if I as an event movie, which on behalf of my client (through the auxiliary DJ) is playing a worldwide hit, and I get this event documented on video and then to the AG to sell the video as a documentary? ?
Am I stupid then, or is compensated by the Gema Gema fees for the event?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
You should actually be with the company, unless your video is intended for later publication. If the client is really only as a documentary in the cabinet raises, it should cost nothing next. I would s.Deiner place such a contract in writing beforehand and the future use small hair down. And yet you can still be a fool if the video at Youtube zuuuuufällig & Co. appears - it can be hairy, as rauszukommen again (although, as always, the GEMA, the smallest problem is the chain).
BG
Andreas
Antwort von handiro:
Hello,
I have a company for a meeting with about 150 participants in a 4 *- hotel filmed. The event went all day: the arrival, lectures, food, small interviews, etc.
Now should I make it a 5-10 minute clip cut. The problem is that I, as a global piece of music should use well-known hit!
Gema I have the problem at the company s.Telefon approached me and said that had no preference, because it is not published.
The clip should s.alle but participants will be sent!
Is there a possibility that I could legally withdraw from the responsibility? Some with a contract or something?
Thanks & Regards, Gerold:) what has been written here so far is only partly good. there are actually only 4 solutions:
1.the rights holder of the hits say your contracting what it costs and he pays (forget it)
2. You hire a composer, a similar work to re-compose, where he worked for Gema registration synonymous brav the "hit" as a quote in the registration form indicates. This work is then added.
3. You ask neither here nor elsewhere, simply take the music, make copies and you wonder why 20 years later synonymous never happened, because the effort, with the legally Armwälten pursue expensive than the prospect below process profit!
4. You share with the company that you do not punishable weigerst and you want the original song under the clip to be.
At 3, I Schlaum the eggs, which all know about it so just say to me as a composer is exactly what happens: I see a film on the BBC, produced in Israel, MUSIC OF MINE WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE CD JUST COPIED! REFUSES TO TODAY THE BBC for broadcasting GEMA TO MY RIGHT TO PAY ......
the film's producers to find lasted 6 months, of which I've received Offebacher ...
continue to have fun with your knowledge, the reality is different ....
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
what has been written here so far is only partly good. there are actually only 4 solutions:
Your point 3 is not a solution, but a possibility. Your own experience in worship, but you should really not be of help seekers suggest "nothing has happened." From my professional practice, I know only too well the Page "is happening."
