Infoseite // Objektivunterschiede HC1 and HC3?



Frage von Ralf Kriegsmann:


Hello everybody!

I wanted to buy a wide angle lens of my HC3 Raynox.
When I looked at the product list of HC1, the choice was greater.
Are the Lenses of the two cams of different size, or you can use the lenses of HC1 synonymous with the HC3?
[http://www.raynox.co.jp/german/video/hdrhc1/index.htm] HC1


Space


Antwort von Ralf Kriegsmann:

* lift *

Space


Antwort von Jan:

The thread has 37 mm of HC 1 - HC 3 is 30 mm. One could use adapter - but be warned - Vignetierung ...

LG
Jan

Space


Antwort von Waldemar61:

I have the 0.5 of intent with Raynox adapter. I see no vignetting, but the brilliance is going down very much. Furthermore, the thing is extremely streulichtempfindlich. Have now ordered nor the 0.7 x Of Sonywith 30mm thread. Is expensive, but I think one of the Raynox is not really an HD cam.

Space


Antwort von ruessel:

If you want to do you something good: Buy the original Sony wide angle. I have both because the HC3 and HC1 wide .... a trace of HC1 Wide Angleist bit better ...... But the two separate worlds of Raynox Wide Angle.

Space


Antwort von Alpinist:

"ruessel" wrote: If you want to do you something good: Buy the original Sony wide-angle ... But the two separate worlds of Raynox Wide Angle.
What do you mean?

The VCL-0630X for 66 EUR (factor 0.6) VCL-HG0730 for EUR 200 (factor 0.7)?

Which one shows the larger area? I would now auseghen of the factorization of the focal, and then the less expensive but has the larger Full Resolution Sample hervotun then probably synonymous qualitative deficiencies - or am I wrong?
Upper better yet, it is no preference? ;-)



Space


Antwort von Jan:

Yes HC 1 owner take the HDV optimized VCL HG 0737 Y's see when / if Sonysynonymous an HDV optimized for the HC 3-rausbringt times do I have to investigate ...

HC 3 would zb. VCL HG 0730 X 0630 X or zb VCL exactly as described.

Is always the same question of the price, if possible, use the more high-grade heat-treated to obtain the optimum s.Qualität to (flare, vignetting etc) - just right for HDV cameras. The 0630 x then has more wide Angleals HG 0730, straight lines are broken in but still low factor more, creating a 0.3-0.4 x already has a charm, but even with expected quality loss is - but the fish-eye angle is thus feasible .

VG
Jan

Space


Antwort von Alpinist:

"Jan" wrote: HC 3 would zb. VCL HG 0730 X 0630 X or zb VCL exactly as described.
Villeicht ought to mention that I have the HC3 ;-)

"Jan" wrote: Is always the same question of the price, if possible, use the more high-grade heat-treated to obtain the optimum s.Qualität to (flare, vignetting etc) - just right for HDV cameras.
The question that presents itself to me, here is more expensive really better?

"Jan" wrote: The 0630 x then has more wide Angleals HG 0730, straight lines are broken in but still low factor more, creating a 0.3-0.4 x already has a charm, but even with expected quality loss is - but the fish-eye angle is thus feasible .
Could it be that this is 0730er only more expensive because it is not / no / less biased than the 0630er? The image quality loss like you mention relate to your example, 0.3-0.4 x and not on Lenses with 0.6-0.7 x, right?

Mir gehts so are especially at short intervals before the Camera (30-100cm) a larger output frame. Actually, it can distort synonymous quiet a bit, while there is no real fish-eye lens in which one no longer recognizes. Since probably only trying to help ...

Regards

--
http://www.alpinisten.info/
http://www.gipfelsammler.de/

Space


Antwort von Jan:

The 0730 is indeed the high-grade pay, where one of a very good
Compensation must be based, not that the incident light "wild" shines through the whole lens, and still synonymous reached the edge, grad with WW very complicated and expensive. The more MF as eg 0.6 x
or 0.4 the thing always makes more difficult - the lenses must be properly processed outstanding - what the whole thing would make expensive because many more expensive lenses must be used eg. aspherical and apochromatic (APO, UD & fluoride). Hence a high contrast, good sharpness and precise color is performancemöglich.

Yes clearly you can practically take the 0630, so synonymous SonyHC 3 has already been incorporated into the Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar, many companies just in the front lens of their best lenses - there where the light shines through first.

Is it nonsense an almost uncoated Kunstoffkonverter front screws on it, just right for HDV is synonymous to see where it has every little "thing" that Russell had a bad experience so synonymous with marbled converters informed us and I think he has very good hands-on experience .

For 500 ¬ you can have the camera take 0630er for HC 3, I would, however, invest more, or test halt - 14 days return right.

VG
Jan

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash