Frage von rtzbild:
Aloha,
Act in case I turn into what miniDV s.and take individual scenes from the
Oregon ATC2000 with 640*480/30Insbesondere of VGA 640*480 (4:3) auf PAL (4:3)??
Werden die fehlenden Pixel dazu gerechnet (interpoliert), habe ich einen schwarzen Rand oder muss ich bei derartigen Produktionen die niedrigste Resolutionaller Medien (hier dann 640*480) als Standard nehmen?
Kann ich dann sauber überhaupt z.B. Start and Landung (of Dritten) with miniDV aufzunehmen, den Flug aber mittels der Oregon?
Könnte mir bitte mal darüber hinaus jemand erklären, wie sich die hier
pacelog 480 TVL Oregon ATC2000 with 640*480/30Insbesondere of VGA 640*480 (4:3) auf PAL (4:3)??
Werden die fehlenden Pixel dazu gerechnet (interpoliert), habe ich einen schwarzen Rand oder muss ich bei derartigen Produktionen die niedrigste Resolutionaller Medien (hier dann 640*480) als Standard nehmen?
Kann ich dann sauber überhaupt z.B. Start and Landung (of Dritten) with miniDV aufzunehmen, den Flug aber mittels der Oregon?
Könnte mir bitte mal darüber hinaus jemand erklären, wie sich die hier
CCD sensor: 1 / 3 "HAD SonyEXview
Resolution: 752 X 582 pixel / 480 TV lines behave?
So there should be no distortions?
Theoretically, the same as when I am with the camcorder directly
record?
752 * 582 is PAL, but what is with the lines?
BildauflösungIst das lediglich eine Qualitätsangabe, wieviele Details der Chip noch auseinander halten kann and damit eine im Normalfall zu vernachlässigende Angabe??
Gaskrank (very informative)
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Olli,
640 × 480 @ 30 fps is so far clear, but we are talking of a MiniDV camcorder for 190 ¬ or 4,000 ¬ for? Consumer Motivsuch-camera work or decent video tripod with an experienced user?
And what options do you have the VGA material in DV / PAL converted?
Antwort von rtzbild:
Hi Markus,
I germinated in the spontaneous idea to me the ATC2000 "s.den hat" to put, if I see a exterior filming at the parachute club, or have me at the festival "by the people" mix.
You dive with a VX-9000 somewhere, it is equal to "Guck mal, the TV" and the winking Kasper as mistaken in the Cam. Dito XM-2.
But even the MVX45i is me Skydiving something risky, especially for the one I am neither a camera filming helmet wants to buy, nor importance to attach, the thing that gets dropped.
To that extent I have already thought of mounting s.geeignete-light-ATC2000 s.der equipment.
For the camera work s.sich: Sauber and seriously, YouTube movies, other turn. OK, I was initially synonymous not synonymous of my previous camcorder umzuhängen my dog when he rummages in the Moselauen, but always with some abdominal pain ... Dog swim + water = / = your camcorder, you understand? o)
Well, so we went with a question of whether I use the 640 * 480p30 in miniDV stream may include, or whether I am in such a case better in the "Smart Card" mode (like Oregon) go, but the result is grottig not sendetauglich still not even for the Bürgerfunk.
Meanwhile, I am Abner become something smarter and have read here that one result of the PAL-NTSC down only to be expected, then klappts probably better.
I have Oregon as a time a 90-day samples from the importer may, let's see, water dives; o)
Different patterns here, but unknown, which was Resolutioneingestellt: http://www.myactioncam.de
LG Olli
Antwort von Markus:
... and have read here that one result of the PAL-NTSC down only to be expected, then klappts probably better. I would strongly predict but try it! Not that this is only at a certain software is ...
Antwort von rtzbild:
I will test the Cam times, the test movies on-myactioncam Page grottig were in any case.
Nice observation: The image quality under water is much better than water. The Verzitterer but are cruel, an image stabilizer would be needed
Maybe I take a highly synonymous resolutive Fingercam in PAL, but then again I have the recorder s.Bein ...
And aerial photography using kites then again not synonymous.
LG Olli
