Frage von campool:
deleted!
Antwort von Mink:
... times but no one says anything about it.
Tim But even write something about it. .... (; Funny post)
Antwort von campool:
You actually right ... Last night was probably a bit too late:)
Antwort von r.p.television:
Yeah, the alcohol.
Antwort von campool:
Hello,
I'm semi-professional and working uswith the HVR HD1000E (; Sony). ) Is I keep reading in the forum, as they diffarmiert (;: D. Many users want to know how they worked in practice, but no one says anything about time. Because I am with her often for sports and local news, I'm on the road had already made some experiences with her. Based on this experience can be synonymous to say that it makes even a hand-held camera in the studio use in terms of handling, professional handling and image quality a good figure. I once arguing:
positive
-very good handling (and I think the shoulder pads) not too hard
good-quality
easy for shoulder-mounted camcorder (but not hollow, such as knock test proves;))
-very good sound quality (; however, comes at 3 o'clock, 5 mm jack is not really joy ...)
Ideal for semi-professionals -> because not too many controls s.Gehäuse (; for insiders, however, it could still be a few more)
- DV INPUT! (to use, so synonymous as DV / HDV Recorder REALLY about)
Many Missing-setting options of former Sony Cams (the price category, for example Nightshot)
Many picture-and-audio output, (not for the professionals, other than firewire ...)
as-well-used hand-held camera (; s.besten connect via BNC adapter or RG59)
Headphone Jack
-all: Focus ring
negative
-Viewfinder and LCD are inadequate for evaluating non-HD
amateur-only thread ---> Tripod
Sound only on 3, 5 mm jack
(Only ONE focusing ring; for Aperture, zoom and focus)
WB, Asra and co. only adjustable via menu
If you have any questions, they can ask you!
gruß Tim
Antwort von Manuell:
Once again you can see how deep the area can be taken camcorders. I am not a beginner anymore, but certainly synonymous far our suite of professional, (ie something in between, semi)-professional, but a camera with only one ring for Aperture / Focus / Zoom is already fierce. But to each their own when the camera is working for you that's all right
Antwort von ruessel:
good-quality You really HD at all possible comparisons?
Antwort von campool:
@ Manual (;?):
That was something I had suspected ...
I wrote that I include working with the HD1000, but not only. However, it is quite an (: if (synonymous non-professional) alternative to the upper middle class; If the image quality of her real s.The XH A1 approached. OWN experience!) In addition, it is important not just depend on the camera. It is important that the result looks professional and on a professional media can be printed ----> XD (; you know it determines from personal experience: D)
@ Ruessel:
everything there is. I come s.alles ran
...................................
(; XDCAM too!)
Thanks for your opinions!
Antwort von Manuell:
Hey campool,
so I said yes synonymous if the camera covers the tasks that you want to meet with her / have to, so it fits :-)
I would probably hold the camera fiddly, but she had never used.
Antwort von campool:
It is for fully-and semi-professionals in fact very difficult to imagine any work so good at when they first see the camcorder.
gruß Tim
Antwort von Commanderjanke:
hello Campool,
Here one speaks of the so-called Semipropfis. From personal experience I can say that it is an absolute nonsense like a camera HVR-HD1000 me a Canon XHA1/SonyFX1000 (stay; to HDV, compare), you did not directly written, but since you "s . comest ran everything, "I take this as a prerequisite. I'll admit that quite a Canon XHA1 mediocre pictures makes when you use it in automatic mode. It is run in automatic mode, however, synonymous of great cheese. About 20-30 parameters can be set as the Canon as one needs you, that simply goes with the Sonynicht. Since Ruessel has indeed posted in the thread here anyway, I can only say to use its presets and (use the camera in manual mode, you need to know what you are doing, of course) and you get really good pictures with the Canon, with the exception of occasional CA. I know what I'm talking because I have only the HVR-HD1000 and had then resorted to the Canon, and has nothing to say that I let come to this camera, it is a true workhorse and has an excellent sharpness. The Sonymacht a very soft picture, the focus is partially pumped as Sau (; gehts garnich in low light) but then we should leave the camera in the suitcase anyway, since you generally will be blurred, soft hail and and And. The Micro is really quite ok But murmurs something. The buttstock is of course not bad, that the upholstery was made of plastic synonymous, but I did not mind the position for the eyecup was, at least for my body to be a pain. Basically, it is true that one can adjust a few things (and more than most Consumercams), but much is buried deep in the menu. The focus ring is really very handy, but only with evidence of a function, we come very quickly s.The limits and must then again in the menu. In short, in daylight it makes the pictures are OK, but no longer synonymous. If you're unlucky then spins the autofocus. It is halt ein Consumereinchipper in the large enclosure, and nothing more.
I have also used the Canon and the Sonysogar once for a project, and then was very disappointed of the Sony. I then had to admit that it was a bad buy for the area which I do. There's speed in the setting of safe and focus lowlighteigenschaften good and everything that has prompted the Sonynicht.
Greetings from the movies imperious commander
Antwort von Kar.El.Gott:
Semi-professional and autofocus ....?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Semi-professional and autofocus ....? AF, there are cheap consumer area, as well as for more expensive broadcast lenses: Why should he then give up the middle, "Semi-Professional" level is not synonymous?
Antwort von campool:
in a live-studio-einsatz it is in no sense did with the autofokus work. as the VJ or eb-cameraman but it is often useful.
