Frage von AmateurProfi:
Hello,
how do they call this type of video films?
This film indeed runs counter to all rules of good movies, but it still puts a technique behind it?
Can someone tell me how to call this kind of video clip? [/ Url]
Antwort von DWUA:
1. This film indeed runs counter to all rules of good movies ....
2. Technology behind it?
3. Can someone tell me how to call this kind of video clip? To 1
Contradiction! What kind of ( "good") rules?
to 2
Yes.
to 3
No.. Perhaps
"crystallized". ;))
Look here:
http://www.swarovski-crystallized.com/Portal.Node/public?gentics.am=main_content&p.contentid=10007.113422
(The
Making of the makers of "Clint"
KING FU).
Antwort von Debonnaire:
This film indeed runs counter to all rules of good movies, but it still puts a technique behind it? I understand your question simply does not! Can you formulate the new times and show a little more detail, please?
Antwort von AmateurProfi:
To 1
Contradiction! What kind of ( "good") rules?
to 2
Yes.
to 3
No.. Perhaps "crystallized".
;))
Look here:
http://www.swarovski-crystallized.com/Portal.Node/public?gentics.am=main_content&p.contentid=10007.113422
(The Making of the makers of "Clint"
KING FU). I meant no "good" rules, but the basic rules.
This film indeed runs counter to all rules of good movies, but it still puts a technique behind it?
I understand your question simply does not! Can you formulate the new times and show a little more detail, please? I would like to know how to call this type of film.
Wür here, for example create a user Slashcam a movie and post here on the forum, which consists of 90% zoom, pan and zoom and pan, he would receive the harshest criticism for it ....... And to be told what you're doing a shit? (of course not quite so, but similar)
Antwort von camworks:
I can not answer grad, I feel sick. from the film and (especially) the models.
Antwort von Axel:
Wür here, for example create a user Slashcam a movie and post here on the forum, which consists of 90% zoom, pan and zoom and pan, he would receive the harshest criticism for it ....... And to be told what you're doing a shit? (of course not quite so, but similar) I've only once drübergeguckt quickly. It is used primarily an editing style, small, fast zooms and Reißschwenks to come over if the motives themselves are not as dynamic. Most camera people are too uncertain or conservative, you can make a lot but synonymous later or use just above all that of which they believe that it cuts off it. As it is? No idea
Bourne Ultimatum has got an Oscar for this type of cut, even though many think it is nonsense. Of course, it's antics, a formal reception with Tripod kotzigem pivot from the catwalk but also a nonsense.
Patterns (here synonymous in the uptake of camera-tricks) have a filmic meaning, and this can be deduced from their merits, or lack of authorization. The meaning here is: increased attention, trying to orient themselves quickly when one of stimuli is flooded. Hence: Justified, the use is not objectionable.
Most agents are very filmic and arbitrarily have no precedent in the natural look. There are, admittedly, no pans, no zooms, no crane shot, and no sharpness relocations. What, however, there are "cuts".
The above-mentioned technique, however it may be called, is often used in
avatar to the realism of a fully executed as a CGI animation enhance scene. And that, although realistically only a camera, but not a human eye, can produce these things ...
Antwort von DWUA:
I meant no "good" rules, but the basic rules. Do you have clear examples of ground rules "good movies" ready?
Bring it on with the recipes; for Comparison.
;))
