Infoseite // SonyPDW-F330K

Frage von jbdmig:


Hello

Is there an adapter for PDW-F330K with you DSLR (Canon, Nikon, Sigma, etc) can join? Manufacturer of Obtik no preference would be to me ...

Would need a mega zoom documentation for an animal (yes, the camera is probably too large a number ;-), but I search everywhere) ...

The XL H1 (1 / 3 "chips), there is something with the focal length factor of 7th
Is probably a minor factor in type 1 / 2 "chips? Probably 4 / 5 or something?

Or it would be better to have a XL H1 with the EF adapter to buy?
The XL H1 would be easy to handle me on the shoulder (for the documentation but it would be SOWISO a tripod, but the camera is then yes, but not to sell and will certainly synonymous times on the shoulder) interfere.
Another minus point for the XL H1 would be the noise behavior (with an adapter so you have to SOWISO 1.2 stops deduct) ...
Also, the recording technology of the PDW-F330K I personally find better ...

The lack of HD-SDI output would like to thank the Sony did not interfere, because the necessary hardware would cost me too much and much better quality so it would not happen, right?

Probably not, because of smaller chips, noise behavior, etc.

Now I have once again on the Sonygeschwärmt and am essentially abandoned by the ...

Wanted:
Adapters for SonyPDW-F330K with which you can connect DSLR Lenses ...

Gruss Tobi



Antwort von jbdmig:

What I am looking for is an adapter with one photo lenses (Canon or Nikon or etc (not depending on)) s.die PDW-330 can be connected.

So lens -> 1 / 2 "

Have an adapter with which you found 2 / 3 "Lenses s.1 / 2" can be connected ...

Perhaps there is an adapter with one photo lenses S.2 / 3 "can be connected?

But then would be a bit much synonymous adapter and the light would be relatively far down drag?



Antwort von robbie:

jap, luminous huge loses he ...
because I do not need this adapter, I have never been synonymous busy. give but they do it.
s.besten you torment thee times by objectively accessories at b & h ...



Antwort von Pianist:

"jbdmig" wrote: Or it would be better to have a XL H1 with the EF adapter to buy?
You've still no F330 and want to know what you should buy? Then tell it out, what you actually did before and what quality level the play. If the home is for you, that is as sophisticated amateur camera, then this may be okay, but for everything else this camera is even less suitable than the F350. I can but if you like to explain the interest.

Matthias



Antwort von Basti16:

"Pianist" wrote: ... but for everything else this camera is even less suitable than the F350. I can but if you like to explain the interest ...
Yes, I would have explained ...

So with the camera is then rotated and animal films synonymous filmed at airshows ...

In both cases the camera on a tripod stand ...

But the camera will often synonymous safely on the shoulder and used as the XL H1, with its strange design, quite uncomfortable for longer shoots ...

The viewfinders of the XL H1 is not that the truth of what sharpness control is concerned.

I'm about to google HA42X13, 5BERD-U of Fujifilm rise.
We could do with the 2 / 3 "to 1 / 2" s.die F330 join.

It has a zoom of 42X and a built in 2x extender with the 84x zoom then it would be. That would actually meet ...

But, as already written above, what is s.der F330 and F350 are not good?



Antwort von PowerMac:

Alter Schwede! Through the use of 2 / 3 's.1 / 2 "increases the focal again. Sure, that HA42X13, 5BERD synonymous still has 2x extender? You would then have to 100x zoom. For this you need a bomb tripod!



Antwort von jbdmig:

Oops, did I forget login ... (EDIT: So by the guest)

The answer comes top of me ;-)

Oh yes, with the cam would be synonymous shorts etc and rotated as the ideal ... 24P

The XL H1 is yes 25f (surcharge synonymous 24f) but these are simply composite fields ...
If, on the PDW-F330 full right (think of the price !?!)?

"PowerMac" wrote: Alter Schwede! Through the use of 2 / 3 's.1 / 2 "increases the focal again. Sure, that HA42X13, 5BERD synonymous still has 2x extender? You would then have to 100x zoom. For this you need a bomb tripod!
Weiss is not what you bombed tripod understand, but this one
When the zoom is so much, then the extender is not needed then of course ...



Antwort von Pianist:

"Anonymous" wrote: So with the camera is then rotated and animal films synonymous filmed at airshows ...
I clarify my question: Who are the client / customer?

My opinion about the two XDCAM HD cameras comes after extensive testing shots in the spring from fairly damning, to me at that time I had spoken in detail here. The 2-inch viewfinders of the F350 is a typical sony disaster, so is not a correct assessment of the possible exposure and sharpness. Therefore, I would like the 1.5-inch viewfinders of F330 did not even watch. The Halbzoll chips are too small and have too few pixels. Moreover, they rustle in the dark color is too strong. The 4:1:1-Farbsampling is far too thin. If you really need to correct something, you have little leeway. The data rate of 35 Mbit / s is much too low. At the beginning of the chain must not have such a meager data with Long-GOP compression, that goes up the chain s.Ende. The blue discs represent a very good impression, but the laser must be triggered by the relatively large diameter synonymous fairly wide displacement, which is certainly in the longer term is expected to lead to problems. The kit lens of the 330 is actually more of a potsherd.

I now have surely forgotten something, but I have no reason to send me details about this camera still to remember, except just so much to people like you to say that you should not buy something. In an English-speaking forum, incidentally I have been following a similar statement equal to the write privileges removed.

You get in any event today a series of HD cameras, which produce much better pictures. A salesperson told me to recently admitted that these devices, such as lead are on the shelves. Many are on the 4:2:2 variant wait, but synonymous of the I'm not convinced.

And I think it's only a matter of time before the HD Channel of these cameras that list.

Matthias



Antwort von Pianist:

"Anonymous" wrote: I'm about to google HA42X13, 5BERD-U of Fujifilm rise.
Was that a page with or without quotation? I hardly believe that you have a lens in the equivalent of a 12-cylinder BMW s.eine Camera in the equivalent of a Fiat Punto want to connect.

Matthias






Antwort von jbdmig:

Then I would be with the XL H1 so much better served?

Since then, however, I have almost an AJA system with the video on uncompressed HD-SDI out to ensure the best picture quality?



Antwort von Pianist:

"jbdmig" wrote: Then I would be with the XL H1 so much better served?
I can say nothing, because I am in the lower segment is not familiar. But now you've still not written about, what with the pictures of the animals and the aircraft will pass. Are the HD for a broadcaster or fan films that you sell separately? And how many years should the camera be used?

I am not quite clear what background you have. You write what one of the XL-H1, the other part of a mega-schweineteuren zoom optics, for a suitable tripod for more than the XL-H1 costs.

Would you like to spend EUR 10,000 or EUR 50,000 EUR or 100,000? You just turn on you or do you have firm orders of whom always synonymous?

Matthias



Antwort von jbdmig:

Festivals I have no orders, but the films are about a Swiss DVD Shop sells.

The main source of mine is not the synonymous Shooting (unfortunately) ...

The camera should be enough to get a couple of years remain in use ...

Budgetmässig would be the Fujifilm F330K with the telephoto and a tripod just s.Rande ...

XL H1 with an AJA system would be approximately over the same thing as the F330K alone ... The "rest", I could then cut more into the system to invest ...



Antwort von Pianist:

"jbdmig" wrote: Budgetmässig would be the Fujifilm F330K with the telephoto and a tripod just s.Rande ...
You're talking about now, but of a different lens than next up, right?

Matthias



Antwort von jbdmig:

So the thing with the choppy Sonyist ...

Budgetmässig it is simply too much if I am with the XL H1 and a photo on the tele synonymous Requested come ...

The picture quality is certainly not so much worse than that of today Sonyand still full enough ...

While only the question with the 24f mode of the XL to clarify ...



Antwort von PowerMac:

You know that the HA42X13, 5BERD cost about 60,000 euros?
Either of the pianist Editcam HD or the new XDCAM models with full raster and 4:2:2.



Antwort von Pianist:

It is indeed rather earn so little money, so I have similar advice verkniffen. I just wonder: If he s.die DVD fans want to sell - then why even shoot high resolution? It is necessary but currently not on a plethora of 16:9 switchable DVCPro50 camcorders on the second hand market. As a sensible Lens and ran a used Sachtler Video 18 and he should be best technology for his films have. Thus it may be synonymous great practice and is already perfect, if it in a few years and what has earned the next-generation technology purchases. So I was 15 years ago but made synonymous.

Salable fan films, I would not in any event with small cameras rotate, certainly not in the field and flying animals. Both artistically and technically more challenging topics.

Matthias



Antwort von Film Fritz:

Hi!
Bzgl. SonyPDW-F330K, I just want as much notice. We have the camera for more than one years and are fully satisfied. Who blödsinn such a scrap of writing, etc., can really only a Panasonic, or Canon representative. In terms of picture quality the camera can easily keep up with BetaDigital. I am always synonymous when in association with higher-recordings of the cameras which are not or hardly be distinguished. And during a footling price difference of some 10,000 Euros. Criticisms are so far in terms of the supplied Lens entitled to the 1.5 and synonymous Viewfinder is not good. But if you both synonymous changes is still priced at more affordable regions and has a real top quality.
LG. Fritz



Antwort von Pianist:

"Film Fritz" wrote: We have the camera for more than one years and are fully satisfied. Who blödsinn such a scrap of writing, etc., can really only a Panasonic, or Canon representative. In terms of picture quality the camera can easily keep up with BetaDigital.
What should we have a comparison between a high-resolution camera and a normalauflösenden say? And why Panasonic or Canon? What exactly do you want to tell us? So far, I can out of your evaluation only indicates that you are no real comparisons had. But do not worry, I would flunk HDCAM synonymous.

Matthias