Frage von Maenjuellinger:
Hello
I'm new here and therefore wants to praise this brilliant first page. SlashCAM has so far informed me that I was now about to order me a camcorder, so I can finally begin filming.
Unfortunately, I was made clear today of a seller from Sauter in Munich that was worse than its predecessor SonyAX2000 FX1000. He meant the FX1000'm just better pictures and does better in tests, so they have the new one in its range. The difference between the recording format, and joined the XLR connectors is clear, but this statement I could not quite understand.
After this confusing advice I wanted to bring in your advice. SlashCAM according to the tests I do not why his statement should be true.
This whole round and Her annoys me already now. The other option is the Canon XH A1s was before I learned of the AX2000, because of the xlr ports. I just want to make documentaries without much additional light, which means that the camera in low light situations, synonymous perform well, yes of what the Canon can not say that.
On the other Page but Canon should now synonymous bring a successor to the XH-A1s or. The XF300 can not be real, because of its cost. Do you think what is to come in the near future?
Please help me out, so I no longer can deal with the purchase but with the Rotate! The best possible is to invest a lot of money ....
Antwort von DrNibbert:
Hey!
Have recently been thinking back and forth synonymous FX1000 whether or XHA1 ... (I have but then decided to save something and me to buy NX5.)
There is a direct comparison of both cams:
http://www.fxsupport.de/blog/01_09.html
My opinion:
FX1000:
-Lichstärker/Rauscharmer
XHA1:
Sharpener
Nicer color-synonymous in the dark
but in the end it does not take much. If you see the videos finishes (color correction or something) I would take the FX, then you're gonna get through almost the same look as with the A1, but just a little less noise, but not quite as sharp.
I trust the people of Sauter not too much to (coming from Munich, synonymous), but on the AX2000 I have been synonymous not heard too much good. (
Antwort von Maenjuellinger:
I do not understand why you want to bring you the nx5 if you have not heard anything too good on the AX2000. I thought the two were identical except for the additives in the thick nx5 as memory, etc.
all things that I do not need you!
rausbringen really understand why not a successor of a sony digital camera, should the quality of which is worse than the predecessor.
Antwort von Wechiii:
The FX1000 ziiemlich well you get cheap. If you can accept HDV, well then I would resort to the FX1000.
I'm considering either synonymous or FX1000 AX2000 is the question for me. XH A1 (s) comes with me the question. I like the colors of the Sony (:
Greetings
PS: If you sell a FX1000 has ALWAYS HER SO! HERE! : D E-mail is stored in the profile!
Antwort von Wechiii:
The FX1000 ziiemlich well you get cheap. If you can accept HDV, well then I would resort to the FX1000.
I'm considering either synonymous or FX1000 AX2000 is the question for me. XH A1 (s) comes with me the question. I like the colors of the Sony (:
Greetings
PS: If you sell a FX1000 has ALWAYS HER SO! HERE! : D E-mail is stored in the profile!
Antwort von ruessel:
I like the colors of the Sony Nonsense dreams with sauce, the XHA1 (s) has color settings - since the FX1000 of!
Antwort von Wechiii:
Because you are right:) I like the colors anyway - synonymous with no color:)
Antwort von ruessel:
Then write the same, that you will find the beautiful FX1000 ;-)
I have edited together at the last job FX1000 and XHA1 material, a difference is not visible. Only the JVC HM400 was completely different images and more likely to fall.
Antwort von nicecam:
@ Proboscis:
For this you can in the
next thread
