Frage von verflixte:
Hello!
We are in the process provide us with a camcorder and want to of course possible, not more than max. 300 euros to invest. We are on the 37-HC SonyDCR encountered. Who can we recommend this model. Or should we invest more SonyDCR eg HC-47 or 45th
We are beginners and do not need a professional camcorder, but we want to buy scrap not synonymous, because we want to make beautiful pictures ...
Can someone look at these models suggest? Can the benefits and the quality of the Manufacturer trust, or should we better for the same price what else, for example, a Panasonic (which model?) Buy?
Are these models of Sony Cheap replacement battery? And they have a good Image Stabilization? can the video easily on the play on pc?
It would be super if it's in the decision could help.
Thank you!
Antwort von Jan:
Panasonic GS 80 is the better choice for 250 ¬, because accessories (bag, spare battery, tape, possibly UV filter) yet to come.
Especially in the initial price, the Sony's at the bar rather average, the tests show the synonymous of video assets, which is particularly true HC 27 & 37th
The optical stability of the GS 80 is much better.
External batteries?
For Panasonic no problem to get anywhere Batteries CGR Du ala 6, CGA You 7,12,14 and 21 forth - and they work.
In SonyFH Batteries (HC 37.47) there are almost no foreign manufacturer has funtionieren to Ebay, which has Sonyausgetrickst (he goes beyond the power of the camera) - and bypassed the fuse, but if you fool with the power no longer has a battery indicator ....
If then the Sony HC 47, which is not only through time lapse recordings, the better snooze photograph, supplied the FB, the better stability of HC 37 to recommend.
Why is the HC 37 is not so good?
Because Sonywith zoom 40 The people want to impress, but forgets the physics to be observed.
- More lenses, this means more light is scattered, there is simply loss of image, an ordinary citizen with 10x zoom is already in good hands - and even without a tripod are difficult to hold.
PC via Firewire dubbing is 1:1, ie 60 min = 60 min film transfer, editing Danche demand, MPEG 2 compression (if it had not been made) and DVD burn, there would come a few together, DV editing takes halt.
VG
Jan
Antwort von WaldemarSchuh:
Hi Jan,
Thank you for your quick reply.
We have your advice as far as well. Now we are just a little confused as to whether we are actually the Panasonic GS 80 should take, or whether we delve deeper into the pocket and into the 47er Sony should invest. For which of the two would you choose, especially in relation to the Image Stabilization?
Does the Panasonic synonymous the 16:9 format?
Best Regards
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
here the times Datenbläter pictures and Test of Video Active:
HC 47 GS 80 The Image Stabilization is good for both models.
The GS 80 is exactly like the HC 47 16 / 9 anamorphic mode - it will be stretched and equalized for playback. Here you get more Wide Angleund Resolutionbei Moving to 16 / 9
The GS 60 has since only the lowest 16 / 9 mode, letterbox, there are top and bottom black bars are inserted to maintain aspect ratio - that is, even loss of resolution. The anamorphic mode is the better option, even better, however, a camera with 16 / 9 chips - which are in the class does not exist, at least for the Videocams.
The preferential GS 80, in a few score even some advantages, including, manual Shutter & Aperture-free (in numerical values) or amplification-free (in DB), then the supplied Charger, grid fade, the best Wide Angle addition HC 37th
47 HC countered again with better picture resolution and photo functions, 2 Recording & Zoom, Time Lapse, the better night program (for movement), S-video out, docking station (I do not see an advantage, since it s.der Camera Connections few are, so must The station always with) more in the Camera Effects (eg sepia) - Pana since only a black & white in Aperture Camera permits.
VG
Jan
