Frage von cliffomalley:
As I seek constantly to audio samples, I will tell you this is not deprived Comparison:
Tested were:
[list] - Canon hv30 internal microphones
- SonyECM-MS908C
- Rode nt3
- Rode NTG2 [/ list: u: 6d29537d80]
I think it's nt3 sounds s.and on to bissl bassy - which could be good to hire for vintage aircraft engines (; occasion sounds) :-)
Here the comparative:
Ms Edit: Now we're - sorry!
Antwort von DWUA:
Under
these conditions, there can be no
give
very nice microphone test. That's no good.
(Perhaps as Matthias says) nor more to it.
;))
Antwort von cliffomalley:
the precise conditions do you think?
for example, to hire:
[list] - Micro s.einem any other place
- Each Micro shows another recording (time) [/ list: u: d66cd44951]
More I can not think.
I stopped so often find previews, talks in which just one man in four different directions into the Micro.
That is why I had this Comparison here with "beautiful quantified.
If the Micro is there,
Then will talk not only
a man from four different directions in my Micro. ;-)
Antwort von DWUA:
...
Then will talk not only a man from four different directions in my Micro. ;-) Oh, by
the artificial head is seltenst asked.
;)
No:
Then let them speak, that has nothing to do with the above link to.
Everything is good except the most directional microphones.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Put the mic up in one carton with foam inside which you ausklebst - almost mini sound box ne.
Prior to import ne Boxe and Sampel always the same music piece.
So then you were always the same sound source at the same distance and adjustment of the various mics.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von DWUA:
If the questioner has yet none at all of the above makes?
That is the question!
Presumably, he is concerned with an extension to his canon.
Presumably it is a simple stereo mic.
;)
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Achso .... naja no preference: - /
Antwort von cliffomalley:
404ERR
Antwort von shipoffools:
One more stupid and not say anything microphone comparison, I've never seen before.
A fountain next to a busy street (! Film) and to then make statements about four different microphones to try to have evidence of considerable ignorance.
The only thing s.dem video was interesting, was the mic preamp (though not the sound quality that statement is not possible) and the Mattebox s.der HV30, which condemned the type of plastic threaded s.seinem camcorder already has a lot expected .. .
...
But again ne question test scenario:
Why precisely into a box with foam?
The scenario but misses times total s.der reality.
Who is filming in a box filled with foam? No one is filming in a box with foam.
This involves giving neutral as possible, echoing poor experimental setup to have. Microphone a meaningful
comparison can be performed only under absolutely identical conditions in a (enables studio-quiet) atmosphere. Only then can statements about self-noise, output level to take polar pattern, etc..
But since you probably do not have a studio, we went to the "foam box" only a matter of you a chance for the home show micro-test (... can you will also be used as "replacement speaker cab.)
Antwort von cliffomalley:
Ah okay. That is understandable.
Nevertheless, I still do not understand exactly how this microphone comparison should be as bad.
Is it possible to conclude with such a comparison as an expert on it like the microphone behaves in normal circumstances?
I am not able to do so.
In this comparison it is clear to me
that the 4 different microphones behave the same.
If this does not show the comparison?
I just wonder with a difference:
With what was expected of you clicked on this link?
This is but the crucial point.
... And then make statements about four different microphones to try to have evidence of considerable ignorance. ... Where he / she makes in the video statements on the microphones?
The only thing he / she is on this video s.Informationen available is the following:
"All mics were set at-12db on the Canon VixiaHV30. Test done with and without the Juicedlink cx211."
Wanted more he / she does not even show synonymous - I suppose.
I think one should not exaggerate anything.
It is what it is and no more or less.
Suppose s.man drive two cars to test.
The one you drive on road 1 and the others 2 to street
Despite the two different roads you still get an impression about the cars, right?
