The Forum search cracks down on numbers, unfortunately, not übehaupt So I open a new thread (sorry if already been there)
I am now decided what I'll buy Television (a 70cm Philips device) But this device is available in 2 versions, the only difference: even 100 Hz for 300 euros and Only 50 Hz for 250 euros ...
I've asked me already but the opinions differ, the one to say that one does not recognize the difference and it has only a difference in health The other report of a strong flicker at 50 Hz
Would be nice if I get some opinions. Thank you niles
Antwort von Acer:
50 hertz is bad enough. Since I see myself at 60 Hertz (monitor) an unpleasant flicker. Nehru preferred de 100 Hertz version, because you realize the flicker and not to strain your eyes are not as at 50 Hertz. 50 Hz -> I think: very dangerous
Antwort von steveb:
yes 100hz!
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
with larger screen diagonals is 100 Hz requirement. The picture flickers less visible (ie, the flicker is not visible).
Only at 50 Hz DV editing are required, but since you do not turn, uses 70 cm television. ;-)
Antwort von niles:
And would be) with smaller screens (about 55 cm around 50 Hz no problem, right?
For just one thing, I could then use to Sschnitt already evt / Preview would cope with my PC or net? (2.9 Ghz)
Antwort von Markus:
In the 55er, I would draw the line, are s.welcher Diagonal 100 Hz makes sense. One difference is still to be seen as synonymous, but if you want to cut synonymous with the television video film, then he should not manipulate the picture unnecessarily. Finally, it is useful for DV editing, see Interlace Filmmern example, in still images.
Your PC is likely to play clean, digital video, the only question is how the digital data will come as an analog signal for Television?
For those who do not know, both 50 Hz to 100 Hz TVs as synonymous principle requires fibrillation, ie 50 Hz = 2x 25 Hz and 100 Hz interlaced = 2x (2 x 25 Hz) interlaced. The large area flicker is reduced by the 100 Hz technology visible, but the line flicker is often not effective. In addition, many TVs generate 100 Hz saw teeth, thus affecting the sharpness. For Comparison: a TFT computer monitor with a refresh rate of the working of 60 Hz flickers much less than a 100 Hz TV, because his images are displayed progressively (ensures the graphics card). That there are good and less good 100 Hz TV is synonymous to me clearly, but say that a flat rate of 100 Hz TVs are generally better than 50 Hz TV is nonsense. The equation "100> 50 = better" is only with high-quality equipment. For on screen diagonals> 70 cm, I was indeed synonymous for a 100 Hz Television empfehlenwert hold, but the flicker is one of many buying criteria.
