Hey folks, Please help me before I put my keyboard vollkotze. Premiere is unfortunately quite me somehow on the nerves. Yesterday and today I felt 20 years trying to persuade, a video of a MiniDV tape, which I in 25 frames with PAL progressive with my new XL2've just added just to capture. With the new project starts already. Since he offers me not only to apply a progressive project. He wills everything always interlaced. No problem I thought I shall stop, enter manual. Unfortunately, nothing was as synonymous in the manual settings, you can nix because of progressive set. Quite obviously, he asked me in the "General" settings, I first whether the upper or the lower half would like to read. When recording under Compression -> Video gibts ne Although numerous settings s.unterschiedlichen, MiniDV or DV appears progressive, but not here. Only XDCAM HD and DVC PRO HD. Great box. Of s.würde my videos synonymous quite happy without compression on the calculator out, that is uncompressed. Therefore, now I click on "No". Reluctantly So then I create the project, which is not my wishes. That is the point 1
Point 2 is the recording. The points then kindly again on the settings that are going to the recording already in dr project setting could make. Has changed here but as expected nothing synonymous in the list. Progressive synonymous, I can not choose. So now he wants my recorded material interlaced progressive record. All clear. I play my material now and see how the top number of "missed [n] frames" Height blithely into the shoots. From and to, depending on the emotional state, then cut off the middle of recording, which they then usually after every other one seconds recording regularly makes. The friendly notice this: "Some frames have been omitted during the recording" The video, which as a result I get jerky then beautiful. Power but unfortunately anything but happy, the video. Moreover, he has the video in 4:3, although I selected 16:9 in the Settings.
Point 3: The video griselt total. Especially in transition areas between light and dark, but especially in the dark parts are formed as dark artifacts, the entire video image can look very unattractive. On the Camera Settings s.der I have everything set so that just as little noise as possible to see should be. Was taken outside in the sunshine. For exposure was sufficient to ensure that Aperture was beautiful wide open, from ND, gain also. On the television, I have the Filmed first sighted and I must say it was really top. Sure was a bit of rushing to recognize synonymous but only minimally. Without Still Image, it was not perceived. Now in the recorded version of the picture consists almost solely of noise and artifact-dark corners, and also with many Rucklern. And, although I still show "No" Compression had chosen. For comparison I have with the times Compression: DV-PAL "from the list probiert. Exactly the same problems, exactly the same result.
A little confusing and everything under the circumstances are anything but fun. All my joy over the purchase of the XL2 then disappeared with the annoying, unsatisfying issues in Premiere.
I hope you can send me back to help improve mood. Maybe one or the other so ne idea how to solve the problem is. Maybe I'm just too dopey to get the button to find on the thick and bold "Progressive, Uncompressed and without noise record" is written.
In that sense, nice weekend. I build for you. Liebe Grüße, Tim
Antwort von beiti:
There is simply no easy and standard for progressive DV. such as the XL2 simply distribute the progressive image output on two fields - just like the PAL television. The DV signal remains technically interlaced. Really plays a role only if you subsequently moved incorporating elements such as rolling or Wipes title. The default will be calculated in half, which can be synonymous but somewhere in the depths of the project settings if you have those parts "filmmäßig" in frames rendered wants.
So in short: Do not experiment, but rather capture your material as completely normal DV. The processed Premiere lossless. Therefore, "uncompressed" synonymous no advantage.
PS: The fact that the amount of data an uncompressed recording (about 30 MB / sec) some frames are omitted, surprise me at all.
Antwort von Axel:
It is like beiti writes. Capturing as DV PAL interlaced, and in the timeline settings only Halbbildreihenfolge / resp. the line surge (kA, as in the premiere is called) rausmachen. Easy.
Antwort von WoWu:
PAL DV is always lower filed first "as the field order. (exactly reverse of D1 NTSC or PAL widescreen. DV is specified in the so-called Blue Book, or synonymous officially designated as IEC 61834. The signals are interlaced but not in the bitstream as two successive blocks. So this is not a 20ms (at 25 frames / sec) offset in Picture instead.
Antwort von WideScreen:
Not to scold AP .... This may be because nix
Antwort von lxRox:
premiere what version you have then? So I have cs3, UBD kNN because I have no problems setting progressive. as far as I can remember, it can be since the 1 per version? hab synonymous the XL2 - and no problems. So I think what you have done wrong (with the default settings) will not premiere.
rockon lxrox
Antwort von schlappen:
Halli Hallo.
I've synonymous version CS3. If I were in the custom settings to capture and then click on video, I can gradually adjust synonymous. In general settings I can, however, only the upper or lower field first set. A little confusing.
