I would like to see a 35 mm adapter for my XHA1 growth. According to my research, are probably the Letus Extreme and P + S is the most common.
What would you recommend because of your experience?
What accessories do I need to make good use of the part to be able to? (Tripod, LANC available)
On the Letus Page gibts the "Rod support system", which would be suitable for the XHA1?
Questions about issues, but better to ask first then buy, rather than vice versa). For information, I thank in advance.
Gruss Alex
Antwort von raymaker:
Add just discreet about this: Brevis and the Letus SGPro are equal, partly synonymous better. I like the accessories in the Brevis pretty good.
P + S plays anyway priced in its other league, so I only see the three normal systems: What you take is no preference. SGPro has probably the best picture, Brevis and Letus but the flip-modules ...
Since such a large investment adapter ne is, I would look at dvinfo.net look at the Forum, since there are not separate, very large 35mm corner (In the Forum was incidentally the DIY 35mm invented years ago)
Antwort von Alex.A:
Thanks for the info, but I could not synonymous to dvinfo of which I am looking for information.
But as you already said would be a comparison between the systems 1. Letus 35 Extreme 2. Brevis 3. SGPro
sense. Possibly. so someone knows a page where one or the other was tested.
For more information, I would be very grateful.
Gruss Alex
Antwort von Axel:
The Letus Extreme is perfect for the A1. The Rod Support of Indians (ebay, ca 70 ¬) is a copy of the Cavision Rods and fits excellent. Best basic s.Optiken: Possible new Nikon AiS, 35mm 1.4 for once a decent wide angle, even 50mm 1.4 for light telephoto extreme feeling and depth blur, sharpen-shoal. The Letus achromat in is so good that the CA, the A1 Lens against producing almost completely eliminated. You can zoom in and totally easy to KB-4 Working Aperture.
Antwort von Alex.A:
Thanks for the info Axel. Will you ma access. What else do I need besides the adapter, the optic and rod support?
Oh, and since I own the 5D, I could but synonymous Canon EF or Optics? What else do I need anything extra, so that nothing can stand in the way?
Gruss Alex
Antwort von Axel:
"Alex.A" wrote:
What else do I need anything extra, so that nothing can stand in the way?
Since the sun, sun, sun, high contrast and even backlighting well come, would be a matte box with French flag and a set of gray gradient filter is not bad. Recommendations, I can not tell yet, we manage ourselves with Cokin, have an eye on the box Geardear thrown.
Sharpness is the major problem. Imagine you have to hand of everything, always, and you have only a small area of sharpness. What can you say? Tape.
Hand-held camera / shoulder? Has to be practiced. The rods of the support can be obtained by cheap steel " 15mm from the building (the aluminum has unfortunately always 15.5 mm and therefore not fit). Then you could cushion the shoulder. ThisFilter terminal"-3 DB"Monitor, of which the X4-Tech Zelo T7 7 "DVB-T/ANALOG-TV here with DVBT since then synonymous with replaceable batteries available. Tinkers to fix it either, or go to Calumet, where there is a non aufgelisteteten online flash adapter rails there (80 ¬), adjustable and very stable.
A propos stable: Since the whole thing tends to be increasingly difficult, would be a suitable tripod head with good sense.
Antwort von Alex.A:
S.Axel Thank you for the detailed description.
Do you have maybe a contact address for the adapter in Germany, or is it cheaper to buy directly from the manufacturer?
If you purchased directly from the manufacturer have, how much was the accumulated Inch?
What does that with the optics of thought so s.50mm fixed focal length of Canon. Can a cheap synonymous Optics should be used or the L-series come from?
The preset-3dB is also synonymous to the preset of my favorite;), thanks s.Wolfgang.
Gruss Alex
PS: A very hot day, I wish all of them.
Antwort von maniero:
The Letus comes to my knowledge the only manufacturer to buy themselves. And the duties are likely to (as for all imported goods, ...) to 19% VAT + 7-13% import duty amounts. Depending on how skilful you are in your Hauptzollamt argumentierst and capable as the clerk is ...
Antwort von Axel:
"Alex.A" wrote:
Do you have maybe a contact address for the adapter in Germany, or is it cheaper to buy directly from the manufacturer?
I have used of privately purchased, therefore kA
"Alex.A" wrote:
What does that with the optics of thought so s.50mm fixed focal length of Canon. Can a cheap synonymous Optics should be used or the L-series come from?
The A1 is the only scanner. We bought cheap synonymous (older) Lenses used in the bay and were initially pleased. Then gave us a Nikon collector a macro lens from a recent series: No noise when focusing, no "zooming", the sharpness can be better adjusted. Above all, brilliance. We bought, also used the aforementioned optics in the last version (and the multiple paid). The older lenses should supposedly the nicer Bokeh, but the opposite is the case. Conclusion: The wrong approach to saving.
50mm is because of the different aspect ratio (3:2 to 16:9 will, zooming in is necessary) a lightweight telephoto, 35mm is a lightweight WW. Luminous is a requirement s.das Lens. The correct exposure is anyway with the set A1, and its aperture can be in the higher zoom levels up to 1.6 are no longer open, so there is no longer a very high margin has. It is therefore necessary, with ND filters and curve filtering to work.
Since most lenses generally the best display quality for the middle reach visors - with an adapter which is banned, you see the screen - is a high quality lens as required.
The topic is complex, as you remember. Power everything from the beginning Tripod. If it makes indoor shots, bangs a lot of light inside.
Antwort von raymaker:
"Axel" wrote:
"Alex.A" wrote:
Do you have maybe a contact address for the adapter in Germany, or is it cheaper to buy directly from the manufacturer?
I have used of privately purchased, therefore kA
"Alex.A" wrote:
What does that with the optics of thought so s.50mm fixed focal length of Canon. Can a cheap synonymous Optics should be used or the L-series come from?
The A1 is the only scanner. We bought cheap synonymous (older) Lenses used in the bay and were initially pleased. Then gave us a Nikon collector a macro lens from a recent series: No noise when focusing, no "zooming", the sharpness can be better adjusted. Above all, brilliance. We bought, also used the aforementioned optics in the last version (and the multiple paid). The older lenses should supposedly the nicer Bokeh, but the opposite is the case. Conclusion: The wrong approach to saving.
Concretise your contribution. "New," "Old," etc. The Lenses are synonymous names. Thank you.
These are our "new". For older no further description, except "Series E", which is allegedly responsible for anything between Con and Prosumerklasse stands. Those who know, please correct the heck, add. I ask also that this recommendation is not to be seen as an expert, it is there over the years many Nikon lenses, and we have only had a handful. There are synonymous Zeiss optics with Nikon mount, but they have hardly the same buyer as the A1 and the Letus.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"Axel" wrote:
... "Series E", which is allegedly responsible for anything between Con and Prosumerklasse is ...
The Series E lenses were the absolute low-cost class of Nikon, which I recall, together with the entry-level SLR Nikon EM have been introduced. From the optical performance since they were not bad (the 50mm, I had even once), but overall are much lower than the Nikkor optics located.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Alex.A:
One last question about the support rod is still up.
What length should have this (there is 30cm or 45)? Then there are still an option +15 cm, what is this and they have good sense?
Gruss Alex
Antwort von raymaker:
"Bernd E." wrote:
"Axel" wrote:
... "Series E", which is allegedly responsible for anything between Con and Prosumerklasse is ...
The Series E lenses were the absolute low-cost class of Nikon, which I recall, together with the entry-level SLR Nikon EM have been introduced. From the optical performance since they were not bad (the 50mm, I had even once), but overall are much lower than the Nikkor optics located.
Gruß Bernd E.
Visually, they are nearly equal, and often were the AIS lenses s.Ende the products to the Series E were. Calculated and was expected between AIS Series E and not enough about E series for a good optical image quality.
But I guess the metal structure and the larger focus ring s.den AIS parts.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"raymaker" wrote:
... Visually, they are nearly equal, and often were the AIS lenses s.Ende the products to the Series E were ... and Calculated Calculated between AIS Series E and not enough about E series for a good optical image quality .. .
In exceptional cases, may even have been, but since the e-optics is smaller than their AIS counterparts were - and to some not even a counterpart AIS was - it was certainly not the rule. I have the corresponding data is no longer in the head, but a simpler structure with fewer optical lenses than with AIS was characteristic for at least some of them. Figure that their performance was still better than many foreign lenses of the time, shows that Nikon is not too many compromises is received.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von raymaker:
"Bernd E." wrote:
"raymaker" wrote:
... Visually, they are nearly equal, and often were the AIS lenses s.Ende the products to the Series E were ... and Calculated Calculated between AIS Series E and not enough about E series for a good optical image quality .. .
In exceptional cases, may even have been, but since the e-optics is smaller than their AIS counterparts were - and to some not even a counterpart AIS was - it was certainly not the rule. I have the corresponding data is no longer in the head, but a simpler structure with fewer optical lenses than with AIS was characteristic for at least some of them. Figure that their performance was still better than many foreign lenses of the time, shows that Nikon is not too many compromises is received.
Gruß Bernd E.
Maybe for some it was, but the 50mm has the Series E AIS version surprisingly few changes.
Antwort von raymaker:
"Bernd E." wrote:
"raymaker" wrote:
... Visually, they are nearly equal, and often were the AIS lenses s.Ende the products to the Series E were ... and Calculated Calculated between AIS Series E and not enough about E series for a good optical image quality .. .
In exceptional cases, may even have been, but since the e-optics is smaller than their AIS counterparts were - and to some not even a counterpart AIS was - it was certainly not the rule. I have the corresponding data is no longer in the head, but a simpler structure with fewer optical lenses than with AIS was characteristic for at least some of them. Figure that their performance was still better than many foreign lenses of the time, shows that Nikon is not too many compromises is received.
Gruß Bernd E.
Maybe for some it was, but the 50mm has the Series E AIS version surprisingly few changes.
Antwort von Alex.A:
The real question remains;), I would be on a brief reconnaissance pleased.
Quote:
One last question about the support rod is still up.
What length should have this (there is 30cm or 45)? Then there are still an option +15 cm, what is this and they have good sense?
Gruss Alex
Antwort von Axel:
Quote:
One last question about the support rod is still up.
What length should have this (there is 30cm or 45)? Then there are still an option +15 cm, what is this and they have good sense?
Well, the Rods from Indians that I have, are 25.5 cm long rods, and they should not be synonymous one centimeter shorter for the Letus (which has its own support, with the one screw firmly with the adapter fixed-base is, without this is hardly the whole Chose orientation). What no longer draufpasst is a matte, a shoulder rest or stop anything, what the front or the back is longer. Other hand, this minimum length is good to get everything together in a built Pelicase or an elongated bag to pack. The combination of screws and adapter Camera goes in with a few simple (and, respect!, Allen keys with inch dimensions, not available in stores> ebay), the adjustment and fixing takes longer (Siemens star tape and card). The best way so you have everything ready assembled. It should be possible to use longer rods one after another in the assembled condition to replace (not yet tried).
We have tried the old e-Lenses, as I said 35 + 50 mm, and whether their quality theoretically with AIS, Micro, Nikkor or Series D is comparable or not, as the experts say, practically, they are clearly inferior.
Antwort von raymaker:
"Axel" wrote:
We have tried the old e-Lenses, as I said 35 + 50 mm, and whether their quality theoretically with AIS, Micro, Nikkor or Series D is comparable or not, as the experts say, practically, they are clearly inferior.
I have noticed that you are not photographing. You confuse this lens name, dice names confused, etc.
How to see the quality change if the 50mm lens for years and generations have been re-calculated? In practice the error is usually behind the camera;)
Antwort von Nacho:
"Maniero" wrote:
The Letus comes to my knowledge the only manufacturer to buy themselves. And the duties are likely to (as for all imported goods, ...) to 19% VAT + 7-13% import duty amounts. Depending on how skilful you are in your Hauptzollamt argumentierst and capable as the clerk is ...
We have tried the old e-Lenses, as I said 35 + 50 mm, and whether their quality theoretically with AIS, Micro, Nikkor or Series D is comparable or not, as the experts say, practically, they are clearly inferior.
I have noticed that you are not photographing. You confuse this lens name, dice names confused, etc.
How to see the quality change if the 50mm lens for years and generations have been re-calculated? In practice the error is usually behind the camera;)
I photograph are not, that's true. Any theory is always beautiful and good, and I am not against that I know little of this. Sorry for the confusion in the name of Lenses. In practice, behaves especially the old (even after times seen: Auto Nikkor-O 1:2 f = 35mm SN 824181) completely different than the Nikkor 35mm F1.4 AIS, and in the following score:
%Ï The picture sharpness is better with the new, especially for shorter distances. %Ï When the focus changes the focal old, so there is a mini-Zoom comes. %Ï The focus ring makes for a sound to the old, the New is all buttery soft.
It is indeed a completely different lens. That probably explains the differences. Possibly synonymous, it is a question of compensation or wear or what I know so would in fact not a question of construction, but of age. As a non-expert in this field, I give here only an experience again. Should everyone stop buying the lenses, of which he thinks it fit.
