3D Movies - hot or not?Of thomas - 1 Sep 2009 15:21:00 The film theorist Kristin Thompson is trying to in this article sseiner realistic assessment of the trend to 3D Movies and raises the question how successful the campaign to switch to 3-D cinema really is. James Cameron, the avatarsensational but flat Effects This is an auto-generated entry
Perhaps the movies synonymous needs no new technology but simply good films. I was s.Wochenende in Inglorious Bastards and the visitors have long been s.end the film clap.
If, however, now comes every month a new animated film in the cinema, I can understand that the viewing figures slump without a "3D".
For me, 3D and remains - at least for now - a nice gimmick. That's in the potential of technology as I see, but that must go hand in hand with the production of good films.
Antwort von Chezus:
exactly what I've read I thought synonymous with the message. I will go away of the reality plunge into the movie and be entertained. Not his head and herschmeißen because I'm afraid the shark eats me right now.
Good films are rare and have become good 3D is my opinion only a possibility rather than a good story with effects to show off.
Because 3D productions, as well as the demonstration after the event in no way are affordable, I hardly believe that it is synonymous to prevail.
Another example: Sony (, or was it Panasonic) wants a 420Hz television on the market. Who wants that? The Picture negates any good film, and yet so simple and easily destroy any of the longed-for "film look"
I would say back to The Roots brings out the movies with us their history umhaun and with good pictures. Not with 3D computer animation and much more
Antwort von kuebler:
Thus, similar to the two previous posters it sounded probably synonymous for a while, when they introduced color films, and perhaps even the introduction of sound film ...
Antwort von carstenkurz:
And much like with you already in the 50s, 70s and 90s stuff 3D regards ;-)
3D is consistently, if at all, certainly last a few decades, and whether it will still take place in the movies, would be synonymous to doubt. But that 3D Systems currently installed permanently in the future, with mainstream and can be recorded, which could be reasonably expected.
Right now, most have only single digital cinema and 3D rooms. In the present publication, the density is too little, and in the course of 2010 is still much more. Erstmal When the infrastructure is there, it will be used synonymous. Just the regular animation, in which 3D is relatively easy to implement, will provide useful ne utilization.
In contrast to previous film-based 3D systems, the current digital technology is synonymous (more or less perfect, if you take a disregard of the need for glasses) and almost completely artefact. Moreover, it lacked the earlier systems always s.Marktdurchdringung and Mainstream content. Since running for months-and years-and the same natural Lehrfilmchen. High demand could not arise here.
- Carsten
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
It's all off of the displays. As long as you have put on a pair of glasses, due to extremely bad plastic film and the film looks nothing is obscured. You have to imagine it again: there are films in 4K then rotated and viewed through a plastic sunglasses! Simply ridiculous.
