Good morning, I cut the time with Magix Video Deluxe 2007. If I then export the video, I want the choice MPEG1, 2, AVI, uncompressed AVI, MPEG 4; DVI .... what format is your opinion the best quality. Mir is already clear that the best uncompressed AVI, but what format is used in the DVD's used for? As is so synonymous in uncompressed AVI does not burn ... My 2nd Question: If I see a title such as moving into the video at the bottom s.Rand that he is still quite visible, it will be after the export, on the television cut off what's going on?
Antwort von pyjama:
Uncompressed AVI does not exist. Video-DVD requires MPEG-2 Find help in your function after the "Title Safe Area". Which format is best depends on the subsequent use of from: Storage = tape: DV-AVI Family, friends and neighbors bored = DVD: MPEG-2 Via the Internet, or stream = File: MPEG-1, DivX, MPEG-4, WMV, MOV ... The choice of the parameters in MPEG is more or less freely, which is the quality of the video depends.
Among all these terms, there are statements such as in the DV FAQ. Link is at the top of this page.
Antwort von Wiro:
"Anonymous" wrote:
AVI uncompressed, there is not
? What brings you to this statement? Naturally das gibts Gruss Wiro
Antwort von pyjama:
AVI is not format.
Antwort von Mike.:
So for me to export the selection: AVI, Uncompressed AVI, .. ... .. Then it is surely a format, if there is select a format. Is it logical or?
Antwort von Wiro:
"An unknown Anonymous" wrote:
AVI is not format.
You need only uncompressed video in a AVI container pack, you already have an AVI uncompressed. With the format has nothing to do. Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Markus:
"Mike." wrote:
... what format is your opinion the best quality.
In this enumeration uncompressed AVI. But the question is rather what is the most sensible. Here would be DV-AVI to mention, if it is a DV project with appropriate recordings.
"Mike." wrote:
... but what format is used in the DVD's used for?
You need only uncompressed video in a AVI container pack, you already have an AVI uncompressed. With the format has nothing to do. Gruss Wiro
This is probably as with the milk in bottles = bottles of milk in cans and milk cans = in = cardboard milk carton. The question then is what milk is better? I maintain times, no. Finally, nothing will change the packaging s.Inhalt. It is uncompressed, the better the above format, no preference, whether packaged in AVI or not. The packaging has no impact on the quality and content, and makes the deals.
Umkomprimiert is synonymous only get better if the source material is already uncompressed or with filtering material processed on the PC is cached, "smaller" format will again save as uncompressed not better.
Antwort von Wiro:
@ Host I suppose so s.Du want to explain how the video world works? Not bad, but they are obviously old platitudes.
I remember not talked to have, because now the packaging is better. But nice to once again talk about it. ;-))) Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Some milk packs to go scheisse:)
Strictly, there is actually no "uncompressed", because when the conversion is already quantized. But one can of "lossless editing" talk. But to the question from the questioner back ... it can be for domestic use safely neglected. Unless you work with very detailed critical material. As can the DV format sometimes cause problems.
Antwort von pyjama:
"Wiro" wrote:
@ Host I suppose so s.Du want to explain how the video world works? Not bad, but they are obviously old platitudes.
I remember not talked to have, because now the packaging is better. But nice to once again talk about it. ;-))) Gruss Wiro
Thus there is no Miss (t) is sympathetic: Naturally, I wanted you, Wiro, neither oppose nor I wanted to teach yourself or with Binsenweissheiten bored. This is far from me. Indignant and professorales occurrence but synonymous. :-)
