With 4 years ago I bought Canon MV400I (719 ¬) I) is now synonymous the problem Remove the cassette '(global problem. According to the repair of Canon amounts to about 200-240 ¬. Is it worth repairing? Especially since I found some info that after repairs, the same problem has occurred in some, after about 1-1.5 years. For now I get 260 ¬ a Panasonic NV-GS27 EG-S. The DV input on the Canon is no longer necessary, because I edited the film auchauf can now burn DVD. What do you think? Thank you for your input!
Andreas
Antwort von beiti:
Because of the prices of DV camcorders, I assume that a new purchase is the wiser option. However, I would not buy the cheapest and certainly not on DV - In losing, a burned DVD is not an adequate substitute for a video played out.
Antwort von coconut:
If he is not just a "normal" DVD for the DVD player makes gehts schon .. I do so with my *. avi's How do I get me better quality due to less compression and better post-processing options. Above all, it is viiieeel faster time to just pull the file back to the calculator than to capture it again. For now archived pure Währe DVD-RAM, however, better ...
Antwort von Acer:
"coconut" wrote:
Above all, it is viiieeel faster time to just pull the file back to the calculator than to capture it again. For now archived pure Währe DVD-RAM, however, better ...
That's what I see as synonymous. I file my movies on DVD's rather synonymous, because I can manage it, and then faster wiederberarbeiten.
Since 1stündige MiniDVKassette but about 13GB "eats" I have to include a stop at hour 3 DVD's with. But if Blue-Ray 30GB comes with two hours I'll be able pure MiniDV quality show with around 26 GB.
So, better archiving with Blue-Ray will come, for sure
