.footer { } Logo Logo
directory schraeg
Knowledge
Hardware
Software
DV-Movies
HowTo
Misc
A DV(L)-FAQ [e]

DVL-Digest 1154 - Postings:
Index


750fps - slow motion frame rates with a 3 chip camera?
DSR-11 Recording Levels: Preset or AGC? - (2)
Edition
Has DVRaptor RT an analog input and output? - (2) - (3)
Ref AVIs - (2)


750fps - slow motion frame rates with a 3 chip camera? - Adam Wilt


> Is it possible to get high(slow motion) frame rates like 750fps or more
> with
> something like a PD150 or the like?
Sadly, no.
> If not, what could be used?
There are a few suppliers of SDTV systems that shoot at about three times
the normal frame rate (i.e., 90fps) and record to modified tape decks or
to hard disk, for slo-mo playback.
There are also high-speed digital systems (http://www.visiblesolutions.com/
phantomv5.html) that typically record to computer memory, but not in a
broadcast-type format -- these record proscanned images for action
analysis and machine-vision types of applications.
Film cameras are still used, like the Actionmaster lineup from Photosonics
(http://www.photosonics.com/Rental/Actionmaster.html) that go up to 500fps.
Be warned that they have a prodigous appetite for film: a 400 foot load
that lasts 11 minutes at 24fps is gone in 32 seconds at 500fps!
The 4C (http://www.photosonics.com/Rental/4C.html) will run 35mm at up to
2500fps -- at which speed a 1000 foot load lasts 6.4 seconds!
The Photec IV (http://www.visiblesolutions.com/pac.html) burns 16mm at up
to 10000 fps -- or 40000 fps using quarter-frame images. At those rates it'
s cheaper to own and fly a personal jet.
Cheers,
AJW
[Any bizarre line breaks courtesy of OS X's Mail.app. Think Different!]



DSR-11 Recording Levels: Preset or AGC? - Adam Wilt


> ...today I met a local guy that was doing HDCAM and DigiBeta
> work... and seemed to know what he was talking about... he had several 11s
> around the shop... He insisted that the level was fixed and that I could
> just use the levels on my mixer.... What was he thinking about?
I think you'll find that the 11 uses a peak-end limiter instead of an ACG
-- it clamps, but doesn't pump. If you feed it a unity-gain signal at
nominal -10dB levels you'll get clean, undistorted recordings preserving
the dynamic range of the signal. But if you start to get a bit hot on
input, it will most likely limit the excursions to avoid clipping.
I say "most likely" because I haven't tried recording analog on it. I can
test it next week if anyone's interested; I have a couple sitting around
at Omneon.
Cheers,
AJW
[Any bizarre line breaks courtesy of OS X's Mail.app. Think Different!]



DSR-11 Recording Levels: Preset or AGC? - Jon Burkhart


You betcha I'm interested. Go for it Bubba! A little R&D
never hurt nobody. . .
well, 'sept Ben Franklin and his kite ;^)
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Adam Wilt wrote:
>
> I say "most likely" because I haven't tried recording analog on it. I can
> test it next week if anyone's interested; I have a couple sitting around
> at Omneon.



Edition - Adam Wilt


> If one has a choice of highly popular FCP and XDV -- both of which do
> real-time previews -- does one really want to switch back to NOT seeing
> FX while editing? I don't think so.
You can always see the FX by parking on the frame. As Gary mentions, on a
fast machine (no pun intended) many FX render faster than real time anyway.
And you NEVER have to hit Option+R to render ANYTHING -- heeding Crayne's
Law ("All computers wait at the same speed") the FAST folk (like the
iMovie mob) made their computers WORK for a living by using spare CPU
cycles to do automatically what needs to be done sooner or later anyway.
That is progress.
Gary adds:
> Down the road it will be ported to Pinnacle's real-time hardware as well.
This is (I think) the key point behind Pinnacle acquisition of the
FASTstudio product line. Pinnacle's hardware is capable of much more than
Premiere's architecture allows for exploiting. Studio -- now Edition (and
what happened to Liquid?) -- has 5+ years of development behind it as a
driving platform for all manner of hardware-accelerated operations.
Pinnacle now has an in-house NLE that they can use to leverage their
hardware optimally. It'll be interesting to see how this new twist in the
road develops.
> I think it'll find a place in the market. It is much cheaper then FCP or
> XDV - especially when you take into account the bundles DVD authroing
> software.
Another key point -- Pinnacle has priced it sensibly and competitively for
the US market, something that FAST was never able to come to grips with
(in fairness, FAST was used to selling at much higher prices in northern
Europe, where FASTStudio is very successful -- and FAST's business model
and cost structure may not have allowed aggressive price cutting).
Pinnacle also understands marketing whereas the FASTStudio line was almost
entirely unheard of in the states when FAST was in charge. purple, blue,
and silver (and whatever crawls from the dank cellars where mad Pinnacle
scientists are engineering the fusion between Studio SW and Pinnacle HW)
may finally get the exposure -- and respect -- they deserve.
This all bodes ill for Premiere, of course. But recall that back when
Premiere 6.0 was introduced, and I was discussing it with an Adobe product
manager, he said, "yeah, 6 is OK. But 7 will be where the real action is."
Don't count Adobe out just yet...
Cheers,
AJW
[Any bizarre line breaks courtesy of OS X's Mail.app. Think Different!]



Has DVRaptor RT an analog input and output? - Jon Burkhart


The question also asked about input to the DVRaptor RT. Input
is ONLY firewire, no analog.
The DVStorm has both firewire and analog input as well as
output.
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Kevin Curtis wrote:
>
> Directly from the Canopus Web Site:
>
> Analog Video Output
> > 1 x Composite out (RCA)
> > 1 x S-Video out (mini DIN 4pin)
> > NTSC and PAL
>
> Analog Audio Output
> > 1 x Stereo out (RCA)
>
> See http://www.justedit.com/ppt_dvraptorrt.htm for more details
>



Has DVRaptor RT an analog input and output? - Jon Burkhart


I'm sure you would need a firewire camera to use the DVRaptor
RT successfully.
As I mentioned, the DVStorm does take analog input as well as
firewire. Also, it is not necessary to have your camera
hooked up to the system when editing with the DVStorm. Of
course the DVStorm costs much more money, but it's well worth
it, in my opinion.
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Giorgio wrote:
>
> Therefore is it impossible to use an analog videcamera to make editing?
> Or are there some expedients?
> thanks
>



Has DVRaptor RT an analog input and output? - Jon Burkhart


With the cost of the DVRaptor RT plus the cost of the Canopus
converter, then you're near to the cost of a DVStorm which is
a better choice, in my opinion.
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Steve Slocomb wrote:
>
>
> Just on output-get a Canopus convertor for the input.
>



Ref AVIs - Jon Burkhart


Mike, if you will reference page 3-17 of the User's Manual
(sorry, I couldn't resist) you'll see the reference files are
just pointers to the REAL avi files that were captured.
Your procedure of making another reference to other reference
files should have no effect on the quality of the video. They
are just pointers pointing at other pointers. The only
degradation would be where you altered the video in any way
and that would be minuscule.

Rather than make a reference of the "final" edit I would make
my MPEG2 Elementary Stream directly in Storm Edit.
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Mike Onotsky wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been capturing some very long stuff to simply convert to DVD.
> Obviously, I've had to capture as a reference avi to keep it all as one
> file. I am using a DVStorm.
>



Ref AVIs - Jon Burkhart


Mike, you're right about the manual; it's not the best. But,
it's a vast improvement over earlier ones, believe me!
As for Authoring, I use ReelDVD. I bought it just as Sonic
bought the rights to it. They don't promote it very much, but
it does all I need for the foreseeable future. Does great
conversion from WAV to AC-3 stereo audio (not 5 channels, just
two, but that's enough for me) and they allow motion menus as
well.
I enjoy using it very much.
Aloha,
Jon Burkhart
Mike Onotsky wrote:
>
> Thanks Jon,
>
>
> While we're on it, what do you all feel is the best DVD Authoring
> program that will allow for motion menu creation??
>
>




(diese posts stammen von der DV-L Mailingliste - THX to Adam Wilt and Perry Mitchell :-)


Match term in Search Index:


[up]



last update : 21.Februar 2024 - 18:02 - slashCAM is a project by channelunit GmbH- mail : slashcam@--antispam:7465--slashcam.de - deutsche Version