.footer { } Logo Logo
directory schraeg
Knowledge
Hardware
Software
DV-Movies
HowTo
Misc
A DV(L)-FAQ [e]

DVL-Digest 624 - Postings:
Index


35mm Blow Ups
JPEG empiricals
Photoshop 5.0 Text Titles for


35mm Blow Ups - Adam Wilt


The best transfers I have ever seen came from a company in Vancoover, BC
> that used only NTSC and a proprietary process they developed. In the past
> 2 years I have seen a lot of DV to film transfers and this place was the
> best, even over PAL>film. I can't remember the name of the place but
> there can't be too many in Vancoover.
Digital Film Group, Inc.; http://www.digitalfilmgroup.net/
Cheers,
Adam Wilt



JPEG empiricals - "Perry"


I promised to come back with some experimental conclusions so here'tis:
(all experiments conducted with Photoshop)
1) There is no colour prefiltering with still images to change the colour
mapping. (unlike video)
2) The luminance and color components get the same spacial resolution. It
appears that the color components get a lower value resolution. At higher
extremes of compression, the anti aliasing pixels can be compromised
resulting in an apparent loss of resolution.
3) Compression blocks are square, not rectangular as had been suggested.
So to come back to the rotate question:
there is no particular significance in a rotation of the image, it is just
another way of shuffling the information in the compression blocks. you
could get a similar result by moving the image a non multiple of 8 pixels.
In summary:
If you save an image with JPEG compression, the algorithm will discard some
information as being less important (redundant) to the viewer. If you then
re-open this image and resave it with the same JPEG parameters, the
information has already been discarded and so the second JPEG file has
almost the same data size as the first. If you move the image, the
compression blocks change and a new set of redundant information is
discarded, resulting in a smaller but lower quality file.
The bottom line is that quality does not get lost, and data size does not
get smaller, unless the image is moved between generations. Those of us
that have conducted generation tests with DV already knew this to be true.
Note that these conclusions are relevant to the first order effects. The
JPEG algorithm produces artefacts that are often called mosquito trails, and
these will tend to accumulate and get worse in subsequent generations.
Perry Mitchell
Video Facilities
http://www.perrybits.co.uk/



Photoshop 5.0 Text Titles for - Adam Wilt


I have been finding that text titles I create in Photoshop 5.0 for use in
> Premiere 5.1c as scrolling text via the image pan filter produces
> "flickering" text edges as the text scrolls up the screen.
Have a look at http://www.adamwilt.com/Tidbits.html#CGs and see if that helps
solve your problems.
Cheers,
Adam Wilt




(diese posts stammen von der DV-L Mailingliste - THX to Adam Wilt and Perry Mitchell :-)


Match term in Search Index:


[up]



last update : 21.Februar 2024 - 18:02 - slashCAM is a project by channelunit GmbH- mail : slashcam@--antispam:7465--slashcam.de - deutsche Version