16:9 or 4:3 / Aspect Ratio Chaos
Frage von Screws:
We had recently shot with the HDV material and this SonyFX1 with HDVSplit captured.
The issue was made both as a M2T as synonymous as Avi's
Now I am encountered the following problem ...
The avis files are given to me of Premiere or in the Info format 1440x1080 25 frames.
Importing m2ts I said on a Mac, my work place in AFX are 1920x1080 (What irritates me because I thought only makes the FX eigendlich 1440x1080)
Both looks eigendlich similar to the proportions of her talk is not distorted or crushed presented.
Can someone explain to me what's going on? Is my first HDV production was ...
Premiere interpret the files as they are with a PAR of 1.33 - Wire on the Mac, apparently with a PAR of 1.0. Come on out in the end's the same.
HDV is not just HD. 1920 horizontal pixels were not even on the chip. Because HD is supposed to have only square PARs,'s have to be yes for 16:9 synonymous 1920, 1440 ja correspond 4:3. Question: Where do the extra 518,400 pixels on the Mac? A case for
The confusion is understandable. In the corresponding
HDV records in the highest quality mode, only 1440 x 1080 pixels. Compared to the "real" 1920 x 1080 pixels of HDTV, there is a parallel loss of horizontal resolution of about 25 percent. As with the true 16:9 Aufnhamen in DV format are recorded Pixelnichtquadratisch (non-square) and then rectified so that the aspect ratio of 16:9 is maintained properly.
Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
MPEG2 Aspect Ratio
TMPEG und Aspect Ratio einstellen
Aspect Ratio (Seitenverhältnis) nach Virtualdubmod Bearbeitung stimmt nicht
Panasonic GH5s - mit lichtstarkem, unbeweglichen Multi-Aspect Ratio Sensor
Lords of Chaos - Trailer
Panasonic GH5S - Hauttöne, Autofokus, maximal nutzbares ISO, Multi-Aspect-Sensor u.v.m.
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
Apple Final Cut Pro
Avid Media Composer
MAGIX video deLuxe
HD Camcorder database
One-on-One Cam comparison
About our tests