Hey, I was with my Canon HF200 now rumprobiert much. Since I really only do sports photography, and so many pans, etc. I like s.besten in Movies 50i mode. But now I read that you do not want online using 50i. Why is this, is that not at, or where the cons are?
Antwort von HansMaulwurf:
... because PC monitors represent a progressive and when you get so-called frequent panning a pretty dance of the rows.
Antwort von beiti:
Ultimately, it fails only because popular web players (especially Flash), the interlaced format not recognized correctly, that portals such as YouTube and convert them synonymous not auto progressive format.
You can theoretically own the OPTIMAL 50i format to a 50p format, and then the movements remain synonymous s.Computerbildschirm preserved. However, it is possible that such high frame rates of video are not yet supported portals. Was the highest so far at least 30 fps. But there is only a matter of time.
Antwort von Büschel:
So I've uploaded on Youtube a lot 50i Videos and them there to work fine. There is no interlacing or something. 25p, however simply looks shit.
Antwort von beiti:
"Fan" wrote:
So I've uploaded on Youtube a lot 50i Videos and them there to work fine.
Yes? Maybe YouTube can now do the conversion.
In which pixel size and compression to which you have uploaded the videos?
Antwort von Büschel:
The files were mostly in SD MPEG2 files with 5-8MB / s, which are m2t HD video files with 12-13MB / s. What pixel size it was, no idea. I think that Youtube files properly de-interlaced. There are countless older videos on Youtube synonymous from Super8 and VHS-time and are usually only interlaced, so synonymous have starting material for YT and it looks good.
Antwort von beiti:
I have this evening times - only) to try out - a very brief original clip from my Canon HF-100 uploaded (in the original MTS format. And Youtube is actually the thing in full HD without Resolutionund comb Effects again, ie there would appear to be a proper deinterlacing .* However, the movements are not very smooth. So I think that ultimately comes out just 25p - or the high compression makes the theory better motion reproduction destroyed again.
* This can be seen on YouTube videos again and again with interlace combing. But perhaps that indeed happens only if somewhere before the interlace flag is lost. Not everyone who prepared the videos and upload, is with the video technology as familiar as the majority in this forum. :)
