So, as you can see, I have the same two questions that can not me alone.
The first is about the HD format. I do not understand what reason there has that a distinction is still between Pal and NTSC in HD, ie 50 and 60 images. As far as I know, is the SD in different colors or transfer encoding. However, in HD there is not. And ect because of the current., One can not like it needed is sinchronisieren the Camera. Otherwise it is 60p better because it more Images are fluid and everything looks and the Slomos are creating better. I personally would take 60p, if I could, if I get exactly the same Warranty would have, and EU version. Is it correct? What say you?
The second question::) The Panasonic has even 3x CMOS sensors, which are quite small. Can such a System compare with a real one chip system, with a chip size of let's say about 3 x (3x CMOS Panasonic / 3)? I mean, yes because one must accept the chip three colors ... Since only the difference would be with the depth of field, or because the smaller and larger circle of confusion ...
Yes, these things worry me since few days:) Please have the participation and education! Thank you!
Antwort von beiti:
Question 1) Who produced only for himself, can use 60 Hz synonymous: the true has no visible benefits, but no major disadvantages synonymous (except for the occasional fluorescent tube flicker issue). The theoretical advantages that has 60 Hz motion in terms of resolution and slow motion capabilities are hardly practical relevance or be of the disadvantages of the limited data rate eaten again. Hence parity in terms of absolute quality. But it remains the eternal Kompatibilitäsproblem: If today professionally produced videos, you will think not only s.Blu-ray owners, but synonymous s.herkömmliche DVD exploitation and television. And since the TV stations have a smooth transition of SD to HD seek, they must remain at 50 Hz.
The SD with the different ink in the way, was only for analog video formats and has been a history of DV and DVD. On DVD it is no longer a PAL / Secam and NTSC / PAL-M, but only for 50 Hz and 60 Hz with 576 lines with 480 lines. On DVDs that still PAL or NTSC draufsteht is pure "technicians-slang" in order not to confuse the buyer with frequencies and line numbers.
Go to question 2) When one-chip camcorder has some color interpolation (for example, after Bayer pattern) will be held. If the chip just the required total resolution, the interpolation at the expense of detail resolution, the chip has a higher (ideally, four times) resolution, it comes at the expense of intensity. These problems can not in 3-Chip. Really can convert to a solid formula to the quality but not, as is still a lot of from other technical data. In addition, 3-chip is not the same 3-Chip: Some are congruent with chips in full resolution, others have a lower Resolutionund use pixel shift (which then requires another form of interpolation). Ultimately, one must look at each machine individually and test how well the Manufacturer has got it right.
Antwort von dagger_pca:
Hi, thanks for your attention! So far everything resolved, only again to question 2 > So you can not say that the three small chips schelcheter are because they are smaller, because the pixels on them applied, are not smaller, than for a 1-chip system, because draufpassen a chip in this system three times as many pixels have to?
> Now purely of the resolution quality of the chip. I am well aware that the quality of the image of all the factors together s.end abnhängt, not at last of the Processor and the quality of parts etc. s.sich
aso, yes, the data rate is not the same for the 60p and 50p, gill s.der Pana hdc tm 700? I thought the 28Mbits apply to both formats.
Peace!
Antwort von dagger_pca:
Aso, perhaps you mean the data rate, because the lines ... But in both the HD format but have the same number of rows ... Pixel
Antwort von beiti:
"Dagger_pca" wrote:
> So you can not say that the three small chips schelcheter are because they are smaller, because the pixels on them applied, are not smaller, than for a 1-chip system, because draufpassen a chip in this system three times as many pixels have to?
How many pixels are actually on it, you can read in the technical data of each device. In theory for the highest quality three-chip camcorders exactly 1920x1080 and one-chip camcorders should resolve 3840x2160 (this is a clean color value of each 4 pixels). But the practice often differs far off of the theory, and the camcorder with optimal technical data must not be the best ... Unfortunately, consumer camcorder to trim not only in the best possible video quality, but synonymous to good Stillimage resolution - and therefore often are more pixels than necessary to crush the small area. With 3-chip semi-professional camcorders, there are synonymous in the opposite case, namely that the Resolutionder individual chips is low and only by pixel shift (ie, the three chips are not exactly congruent installed, which increases the effective brightness resolution), the HD is Resolutionerrechnet.
The 3-chip technology has a structural advantage, that much is clear. Therefore in the case may be that a 3-chipper with smaller chips makes better pictures than a one-chipper with a larger chip. But you can not generalize.
Quote:
the data rate is not the same for the 60p and 50p, gill s.der Pana hdc tm 700? I thought the 28Mbits apply to both formats.
So it is. And why has the 60-Hz per frame format data rate less available, which can then be with moving images, a small disadvantage. But this idea is theoretically s.end just as the question of whether the motion with 60 Hz resolution is better. We always bought a small advantage here with a small disadvantage there - and these differences will be seen anyway no one.
