I want to use next to "normal" clip for the first time synonymous 35mm adapter recordings (unfortunately ungeflipt) in my Project.
If I'm out of the FX range by Flip Flop turn the picture, I get understandably field errors. Since I control the export from the timeline, only the field sequence for the entire sequence, the mistake to DVD creation.
Is there any way to the individual clips, as interpreted in After FX for example, to determine that is, the field order? Or something like that without having to transcode each clip separately need to import it again afterwards?
I work with MC 3.5
Greetings, Dirk
Antwort von Pianist:
"Anne nervous" wrote:
If I'm out of the FX range by Flip Flop turn the picture, I get understandably field errors.
Why "understandably"? This effect causes no field errors. The problem should therefore be sought elsewhere. What was because originally rotated?
Matthias
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
The film was shot in HDV, captured as DV via firewire with Canon XHA1.
Why not understandable? The picture is simple but with rotated and mirrored FlipFlop. The field order but still remains. But as the last line originated as a "straight", it is now but as the first, or "odd" read. Or I do something wrong?
Antwort von tommyb:
Yes, with flip-flop, the field order reversed. From bottom field is top field.
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
Is there a way synonymous to change them for clips? Or do I only export the clip with the wrong field sequence in order to import it again afterwards?
Antwort von Tuffy:
Have you interpreted in AE just the clip? Say, right click-> Interpret Footage (or, as always synonymous in German)?
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
I want to export the first place because of the quality loss for AE.
Antwort von Pianist:
"Tommyb" wrote:
Yes, with flip-flop, the field order reversed. From bottom field is top field.
Why is this so with me? I can use these effects as desired, the Picture, reflect it on its head, or both synonymous, and the field order is incorrect. Would be synonymous bad if it were otherwise.
Matthias
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
So I have on my (CRT) monitor huge edge-effects. And even on LCD TVs, they are visible.
Antwort von tommyb:
"Pianist" wrote:
Why is this so with me? I can use these effects as desired, the Picture, reflect it on its head, or both synonymous, and the field order is incorrect. Would be synonymous bad if it were otherwise.
Matthias
Because it depends on the editing program, version, settings, materials, etc.
With a 180 degree turn once the odd lines are now sometimes as straight lines reorganized. The editing program must compensate for this effect - which many of us synonymous.
Interlacing artifacts should it arise, however, not very well but the cancer-like back and forth jerking because reversed image sequence.
If you see interlacing artifacts, then maybe the material was not treated as "Interlaced" or the Project is not designed as interlaced. Is, there is a lot of error in AVID (and therefore I no longer use it).
Antwort von Jott:
Although I have not worked with Avid long, but I'm sure the program is completely no preference whether one is a picture on its head - the field sequence is correct. You can rotate the picture so synonymous, because nothing happened with the lines. Would be perverse.
When you more because of what happened as a DV HDV import - these two candidates have different half-frames, because the dog should be buried.
Antwort von Anne Nerven:
Down Conversion takes the camcorder. The effect remains synonymous when I capture in HDV.
