Have now the new Ultimate. Test video is still out, but an initial report I have in my blog www.bewegtbildarbeiter.blogspot.com posted. For questions and suggestions I am grateful.
Regards, Christian
Antwort von r.p.television:
Be with the interest, because I still do even with the purchase of a DoF adapter liebäugle and Letus Extreme actually had in mind. If because of the sharpness of the size difference really from? The price difference is quite a big. 800 euros against 4500th Is at least equal to the area of sharp focus how the camcorder lens directly or is still here to see a difference? Did I read your blog. You apparently still a matte of Cinecity. Is that the large for about 300 euros plus something they called "Jumbo Mattebox 'praise? Hab indeed Chrosziel with which I am very satisfied, would now for my second but the camera frequently while in use and another matte because I did not want to lie down again 1200 euros. You've written the Cinecity-Mattebox was shaky. What wobbles then? The transition to the Rod Support or the filter stage itself? If it were I would probably rather one to two hundred and put me out of the miniMattebox buy Redrock. (of which it's then probably synonymous in the FF).
Best regards, Mike
Antwort von Axel:
With the Canon XH-A1 and the extremes we are - a friend and I, who have together purchased more than satisfied. Initially, we were shooting of Philip Bloom totally dazzled, now we find out some way to bemäkeln. For the price difference Ultimate Extreme: We understand it so that the Ultimate filters for all threads that are larger than 72mm (A1) - that would be yes EX1 or HVX for example - is necessary because the installed achromat is not optimal.
The fact that the rotating screen produces sharper images than the oscillating, I can not imagine all Ultimate Pictures speak of the contrary. Unless it is the aperture range above 5.6 is used, where, as described, the best quality of Lenses reached. Other hand, you do not use an adapter in order to get the same DOF as no adapter ...
Antwort von Bewegtbildarbeiter:
404ERR
Antwort von Axel:
Hello Christian. You're right, there are questionable assumptions, since I had made, partly motivated by envy quite banal.
Thank You respond and that you think quite so ask provocative questions. Respect.
As for the Bloom's video is concerned, you're right. I am using MB Looks and also these things blur and vignettes are given with the repertoire. The Bloom is in this clip right times used excessive and I think so synonymous very exaggerated, especially in the images, which causes the front missing.
As far as the sharpness is concerned, I wanted the Extreme does not do badly. The already makes straight and sharp images in the Combined XH A1 I Stephen Dempsey with very beautiful things. My HVX is not the sharpest s.sich Camera with its small HD Resolutionund added since then have just the extremes and do not ganzsoheftigsupergeilen optics with them. The Ultimate is really synonymous sharper and thus the whole of my system.
Learn me something, if the footage is online, würd am very interested.
Liebe Grüße, Christian
Antwort von Bewegtbildarbeiter:
My first test video, a bit soft sometimes:
http://vimeo.com/1860312
Antwort von Axel:
... and I, the "challenger", the film'm still guilty. This is very good, I hope technically comparable to deliver. Schön synonymous with the song, the last setting is a particularly felicitous Fade out. Even your other films are times I look at them lead.
Antwort von Gysenberg:
Yes, Christian, as I already have written your blog, I find the pictures a little soft, but do not know whether the cause lies in the compression. Synonymous But here again was told that my camera and cut very well liked and I always work from your ideas get. For the above linked video of Bloom: It may be that it is one of the first test shots was when it Letus of the extra lens for the EX 1 did not yet exist, which has Randunschärfen then removed. The lateral vignetting occurs whenever man with the EX 1 with a short focal works, I'll have it - depending on the lens - at least Z 78, so no shadows s.den to have more pages. Unfortunately, during the recording will not be seen as the monitor of the EX 1 has no Fullscan. The evil awakening comes when sighting s.System. I have some problems with processing the extremes. He is with me in the use frequently and I had already two times the screen with hot new adhesive mount, because they had solved. She is actually synonymous "s.Werk" attached with hot glue. Then I took a nasty pollution in one of the inner tubes, you do not s.die comes. See here: http://www.westerholt-gysenberg.de/Letus01.JPG If not so significant, since the adhesive film or whatever it is, during the shooting outside the visual field is. How serious is a bright spot on the screen, when the adapter, it provides as follows: http://www.westerholt-gysenberg.de/LetusMattscheibeSpot01.jpg When running adapter in bright areas to see how here: http://www.westerholt-gysenberg.de/LetusMattscheibeSpot03.jpg Rotated by the vibration unsightly. I must therefore send adapter will then probably two months to renounce them. Basically I can now hardly do without. More depth of field do I get my way, with Nikon 28mm lens, but unfortunately relatively faint (2.8) and blurred as my 50mm is. Work only with fixed focal lengths, but should be a zoom lens test times. Would the work sometimes dramatically easier, faster. Fear only light and sharpness loss. Be over the next two weeks synonymous test material 1/Letus EX Extreme on Vimeo Upload, then we have even more comparisons. I appreciate the kindness of intent lenses play a major role. Maybe a larger than previously thought. Some older recordings have been around here: http://www.westerholt-gysenberg.de/blog/?p=103
The Bloom's Videos: Yes, they are good and they make great incentive. Yes, I like melancholy, but not only. A little life, a little history, synonymous with no slow motion, with no time lapse would be gratifying.
Antwort von Gysenberg:
So, here is a trailer times the current documentation, almost completely with SonyEX 1 and Letus extreme rotated (aerial photographs and guild without adapter). Only with fixed focal lengths, which naturally limits the flexibility. And in the documentary field sudorific, occasionally a suicide command. With the Focus, I am satisfied. And clearly the 50mm lens is my favorite. For more info on the page: http://www.westerholt-gysenberg.de/blog/?p=125
Antwort von Axel:
Jo, the adapter funzt. The exchange of power shots and without which I feel are not synonymous as particularly disturbing. I think your pictures could be something Postpro tolerated. More color, more contrast, that is my personal opinion. Korall halt.
Antwort von Gysenberg:
Well, Postpro has had, I'm reluctant because, with the various codecs synonymous very different results. The linked video is in wmv only, then with Moyea Flash rendered on Vimeo, the already saturated from. Mp4 in H.264 rendered and then uploaded. If the source material is much closer. http://www.vimeo.com/1935814
The recordings are also without power much more adjusted to make them align. Maybe I betimes make a test with more "Korall". Nice concept, I will be in my vocabulary, take over.
Have just seen, the really fat "Korall" did. Hat was. Even and especially because it is synonymous here to an old people: http://www.vimeo.com/1784220
Antwort von ironvillage:
hallo moving staff, I have a ultimate and check the English description for the back focus adjustment is not quite so. I have a zoom and I am of the usual photo-camera, when I s.das object anzoome, a sharp point and then zurückzoome it is synonymous sharp. This is the ultimate but not the case. I think that's with the Backfokusierung style. But how? there is a blue ring with 2 screws and a screw behind it. Turn me out doing nothing. Hmmmm Somehow I do because what's wrong. someone knows how to help me is?
Antwort von ksr:
You zoom with the zoom of the video camera on the screen formatfüllend, then do you sharpener with the sharp ring of the camera. This setting may then remain so until you get the adapter back abmontierst, Any further questions sharpness, the lens will s.Schärfereing BEFORE adapter solved. (That, at any rate when Letus Extreme.)
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
"ironvillage" wrote:
hallo moving staff, I have a ultimate and check the English description for the back focus adjustment is not quite so. I have a zoom and I am of the usual photo-camera, when I s.das object anzoome, a sharp point and then zurückzoome it is synonymous sharp. This is the ultimate but not the case. I think that's with the Backfokusierung style. But how? there is a blue ring with 2 screws and a screw behind it. Turn me out doing nothing. Hmmmm Somehow I do because what's wrong. someone knows how to help me is?
Grab a clean fixed focal length lens and make it to infinity. Then you turn s.Backfocus until it is sharp. Thus, the Auflagenmaß set. Now you should be synonymous to the zoom function. Does it not, is the Auflagenmaß s.Zoom adjusted.
MB
Antwort von ironvillage:
werd I check! very fond of you and thank you! could you tell me in which direction of travel in the left or right? and for what is the third screw, which is not s.blauen Part is? Depp I have the blue ring at the open and turning because I probably a mistake. Perhaps you could point me there reply. Thanks again!
Antwort von Chezus:
@ Axel: you are still one to two test videos guilty;)
Antwort von Chezus:
What I noticed is grad: s.der distance of the shoulder condition Viewfinder seems pretty big. To me it is as if you have a little stretch their necks to the camera just to keep.
Or is that not a problem for you? Still you have a image of you, where you complete the rig on the shoulder are wearing?
and b) @ Axel: Now where is your video? ;)
Antwort von Axel:
"Chezus" wrote:
@ Axel: Now where is your video? ;)
Times I would have a medley of various tests cut, not like what I do because I am not fit as a cameraman. Then the question is how meaningful it would be, but I do it. Stay tuned.
