However, the price for a receiver and transmitter s.die camera a bit too expensive. Additionally, you are so often limited s.eine channel number. And the Camera Balast for the recipient enlarged additionally.
can s.welchen Are there really so pocket recorder to attach a lavalier Micro? What are good products because it so?
Are the remote controllable such solutions?
Antwort von einsiedler:
Grundsätzlicht does it with any Pocket recorder that has a micro input. It would be advisable, eg a zoom H4n as this with XLR connectors and phantom power synonymous connection Lavaliermicros quality permits. However, the part with plugged times then no longer as "pocket":)
Some of the Pocket models have cable remotes vllt. Gibts synonymous IR remote controls in Model. Both brings you nothing. Also could you not check whether the device is real or not. So rather the time and s.Gerät s.der Camera precisely coordinate and run through the recorder then leave. If possible, then work with flap or similar incisive sound to later synchronize better.
Check out alternative views of the Bluetooth Micros Sonyan - that would be a cheap alternative to proper spark gap. However, you limited the number of synonymous in the channel.
If you want to be synonymous in this regard "free", and need more than two channels, then need just really more spark gaps, which, gathering up a sound engineer in the mobile mixer to a stereo signal, which then goes into your camera (or individually on a multitrack) .
