Say, Zizi - could you look at the basic rules of punctuation trained - particularly in the use of commas? And you with the opportunity once again to inform you when you use an exclamation s.Satzende and where it goes?
And yet just let the verdict: Class instead of mass ...
Of course, eat the Cam in Lowlight genial.
But low-light makes perhaps just 20% of which from what the customer with a standard Xacti films - mainly holiday movies.
Alone because of the lack of OIS and the lack of PAL modes include this cam for me rather to the whole Aiptek and FlipMinos, synonymous when these lengths to surpass.
Especially in the temples, pyramids and dark where it is occasionally makes a very good figure where a ridiculous HF10 was / is!
I miss so of the OIS is not really for beginners though he already would be useful!
Do you have a synonymous u HF10 dabeigehabt a comparative test done? Otherwise, I would say pure speculation. Do not believe the HF10 so massive would be much worse off.
And exactly the camcorderinfo.com also has a good deal worse off than all the Canon HV, HF and HGS - despite good Lowlight.
Jep hab much compare their 2 believe me the Sanyo almost plays in another league as noise is concerned!
"Editor's note: double-checking our results with the Sanyo VPC-HD2000, we noticed s.error had been made in our low light sensitivity test. Previously, the camcorder's sensitivity had been tested using a slow shutter-a feature that is not supposed to be engaged during our low light testing. This resulted in the camcorder sensitivity posting a better score than we should have reported. We sincerely apologize for the error and have updated the article to reflect the new, correct test results. "
Because mittlwerweile can be found in the price segment around the $ 500 retail price cheap synonymous (Expiry-) models of Sony, Panasonic, Canon and JVC
!: 1920 × 1080 pixels, 60i Pictures about 30p frames per second to say about 59.94 i 29.97 p *
": 1280 × 720 pixels, 60p frames per second
&: 1280 × 720 pixels, 30p frames per second
* The frame rate this camera is 59.94 frames per second (at 60 frames per second) and 29.97 frames per second (at 30 frames per second).
Hello Darge, the files of the 1010 and 1000 are from a 30p to 60i is expected.
The programs are usually recognized as a 59.94 i 29.97 a p..
If you are in the majority of players ansiehst eckt repeatedly in playback as it is 30p from 60i.
Excerpt from the documentary
!: 1920 × 1080 pixels, 60i Pictures about 30p frames per second to say about 59.94 i 29.97 p *
": 1280 × 720 pixels, 60p frames per second
&: 1280 × 720 pixels, 30p frames per second
* The frame rate this camera is 59.94 frames per second (at 60 frames per second) and 29.97 frames per second (at 30 frames per second).
when transcoding by EDIUS5 the material is in all goodness to process without problems, VDL Transcodiert to 1080p30 without any problems and it is usable via LOILOSCOPE ..
But what strikes me and please note that most players in the material of very different quality of ...
What is real what is wrong in us is presented s.Viewer ..
Comparison of the viewer
VCL
WMP11
PowerDVD7Platin
Mplayer Classic
We can output via the docking station via HDMI as relevant to her? #
The Rudi has taken himself fit testing in the appropriate configuration ...
As I said the files are in the 2000s without Edius5 and when to use but ...
Hello everybody!
Sanyo recognized this problem with the HD1000 and found a firmware, which the files are written slightly differently. Unfortunately, the firmware is not on the German Page but only on the
Antwort von Zizi:
Is the Sanyo synonymous with a history like the JVCs with the HD5 where synonymous 50p off was standing in reality there were only 50i?
I thought that the genuine 60p are now .. Computed performance of the chips would be destined for a long time s.Markt!
Antwort von darg:
Is the Sanyo synonymous with a history like the JVCs with the HD5 where synonymous 50p off was standing in reality there were only 50i?
I thought that the genuine 60p are now .. Computed performance of the chips would be destined for a long time s.Markt!
The computing power is s.Markt but just do not stop for hand-held applications. The draw still hold too much power :-(;
Antwort von LorPGDL:
So I've had and the fh1 before the canon hf 100 and have to say to a moderate quake shakes and partly in the building and the ps3 does not play the files, it is subjective, in my view, both in good light as synonymous with low light better, at low light for more than a piece better. but myself and test wems do not make use of the revocation. but solely of the data since the sanyo zb is already much better than the canon hf 200 (chip size)
Antwort von LarsProgressiv:
Hello shown,
Is there such an update is synonymous for the HD1010? Have tried the URL rewrite, but there are no sides to 1010th
I know of no Firmwärapdäit for the HD1010. But the correction of my HD1000 came out before the synonymous On the market since the HD1010, so the HD1010 the "errors" no longer should have had.
Regards
Lars
Antwort von Zizi:
alone of the data since the sanyo zb is already significantly better than the canon hf 200 (; chip size)
So it is .. the bigger the screen the more geiler the Picture!
That's why I currently film with the MarkII ;-)
I do not check why the sensors are getting smaller .. ?
Since the first Pro / Consumer HD Cams has improved in image quality showed little improvement .. Bad enough that a photographic camera (; 5D MkII) and a 350 ¬ Sanyo Lowlightkünstler the best among the ¬ 10,000 range are .. really embarrassing!
Antwort von darg:
[quote = "Zizi"]
I do not check why the sensors are getting smaller .. ?
Pure cost issue. The smaller the chip, the more fit on a wafer in the production, the higher your yield will be synonymous (and the smaller unit price per run), because more chips per wafer are available. The catch is that optical chip yield is always low, so even the smallest error for each loss of a chip lead.
Antwort von Zizi:
Pure cost issue. The smaller the chip, the more fit on a wafer in the production, the higher your yield will be synonymous (and the smaller unit price per run), because more chips per wafer are available. The catch is that optical chip yield is always low, so even the smallest error for each loss of a chip lead.
Nevertheless, it is incomprehensible to me that in this sector
because profit is hardly a step forward ..
You need to just imagine what a HF100 could make if the sensor about 3x as big!
Because I would like to double synonymous for as a part of pay ..
I would certainly not synonymous and thus the only one that would be profitable but!
All are under ¬ 10,000 but anyway what vollschrot Noise / sensor size is concerned!
Antwort von motiongroup:
@ Rudi
As it looks now rowing Info synonymous something back:
the synonymous, they have already done, and the result corrected itself with these values are stores ... only the Pana HS300 has managed to beat them if synonymous with conceivable short distance ...
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-HDC-HS300--Review-36492.htm
Looking at the price but, I get almost two HD2000 question
Antwort von darg:
Nevertheless, it is incomprehensible to me that in this sector
because profit is hardly a step forward ..
You need to just imagine what a HF100 could make if the sensor about 3x as big!
Because I would like to double synonymous for as a part of pay ..
I would certainly not synonymous and thus the only one that would be profitable but!
All are under ¬ 10,000 but anyway what vollschrot Noise / sensor size is concerned!
Well, if the chip is three times as large, would ensure the price to rise nine times. Optical chips are in the manufacture of very problematic. While at the "normal" processor manufacturing error can be tolerated and mostly only at lower clock rates mean errors in the optics field either hot pixels or dead pixels and that's Committee. If they are small enough, you can wegrechnen but that is not always the case.
Smaller chips are synonymous a kind Frotschritt:
- Less power consumption
- Cheaper, because smaller lenses (OK, that's only good for the Manufacturer!)
- Smaller Cameras
That is holding the Teufelsklreislauf from developing and marketing :-)
Antwort von Zizi:
Well, if the chip is three times as large, would ensure the price to rise nine times.
I doubt it .. da wär then maybe the Cam 1-2/3 expensive ..
Why synonymous anymore? I fold the 9 my HF100 would be a dan ~ 6000 ¬
3x to get a 5D MARK2 with a minimum of 10x as large as a sensor has HF100!
One with a big chip hlab such as that of the 5D for ~ 1000 ¬ in the construction of a JVC HD7 and everything about geritzt!
Only Manufacturer is not willing to build something ..
(Probably a question for the customer always rudimentary to breast Langfrisstige order to attract clients)
Because who has 10 years, the same cam and who often goes to the Manufacturer ...
Antwort von darg:
I speak of chip prices and because already plays tenth cents a role when you compare it to the volume contracts. Was perhaps not so over.
Antwort von alfmo:
Hi folks,
when I look at the file to read, so I feel already so confirmed that the Sanyo 2000 good lowlight videos makes. Thanks s.Zizi, shiranai, but vssmotiongroup for the reference to the video on vimeo.de who have convinced me.
@ Rudi:
camcorderinfo.com rowing very little back, the reason lies in the fact that in the first test shutter speeds longer than 1 / 60 sec have been admitted. Nevertheless, they lowlighttechnisch a par with the Pana HS 300 and well ahead of Canon and Sony.
Walk-in Slashcam lowlight test with slow shutter speeds or not? This would be synonymous for me to explain why the Sony520 here lowlightechnisch so good and performs at camcorderinfo.com not.
Antwort von Zizi:
Nevertheless, they lowlighttechnisch a par with the Pana HS 300 and well ahead of Canon and Sony.
So the Sanyo 1000 is far less noisy as any other I've had and certainly synonymous better as a HS300 ..
Naturally, it is not now the yellow from the egg but under 2000 ¬, I knew what really nothing better in Lowlight Rauscht less!
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
If the 2000 is the successor to the 1010?
"VPC" comes to me before.
What are the differences to the 1010th
Are there any points which are worse than the 1010?
What does it mean that there is no AVCHD logo is? Qualitatively, but not less efficient compression, right?
Can the camera in hardware no more than 24MBit or could simply Manufacturer modes with more bandwidth it will only install if wanted?
What are the alternatives in this price class (; primary and pocket format as here) there are better? This was so under the ISO test image above.
What is the best "trouser pockets-1080-Camera"?
Here, for example, the "HDR-TG3E mentioned. What can be better or worse or not (; Functions in Comparison with the Sanyo 2000)? I read of 1080i. So P is not like the Sanyo the 2000th And apparently no 60 frames, otherwise it would be so mentioned. Furthermore, it seems, at least in the photos as the Sanyo had a significantly greater Lens (;?).
And the memory sticks still cost twice.
MM: Best price / GB ratio = 8GB for about ¬ 20
SDHC: Best price / GB ratio = 16GB for about ¬ 22
And the Sonyhat maximum 16Mbit / s
Antwort von motiongroup:
http://www.camcorderinfo.de/content/Sanyo-Xacti-VPC-HD2000--Review-31.htm
Now at times the entire German ...
great service ..
