The 13 percent increase in viewers is very clear lead back to the 3D movie-making. The normal cinemas without 3D is definitely worse since. The whole synonymous has nothing to do with digital or analog projection, but simply with the 3D hype, but now, on the avatar so slowly subsides. This is 3D hype lures, as in the 70s and 80s simply more spectators to the movies, but on a long term, the viewing figures will go back again.
Alone already complaining of the fact that some viewers of a headache and still to no small part it may be impossible in the near future in space will see which one will lead you prefer the "flat" version of the film looks.
On the edge it should be noted that not a unique feature of the 3D digital technology is, but it is quite possible with a conventional 35mm projector with special optics and a silver-screen cinemas, equipping, at very low cost and coverage. Technicolor did something like already being planned http://www.technicolor.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/Technicolor/Technicolor_3D_web_Brochure.pdf ... and so new is the Over / Under system will not synonymous: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-D_film#The_revival.27s_apex_.281980.E2.80.931984.29
Antwort von Axel:
Whether it is probably still worthwhile to retrofit analog projectors? Especially if you're right, the hype has already passed its peak?
I also believe synonymous. Harry Potter or even the Hobbit will be next year for moderate numbers make (of the whole meatball-children) are silent waste.
But Avatar has some fooled: 3D is, except a couple of exceptions, no longer used as an effect, but only as a highly synthetically generated spatial awareness, as well as with high fidelity surround indeed has nothing to do but will only deepen the trance of the movie experience . Recalled that two levels of lead, such as a foreground object and a background object, in reality mean that each one looks twice the levels, not fixated on the man. In the real world. In Avatar everything seems more or less plastic, but is only squinted in the first scene, the condensed water droplets in Kryosarg. If we succeed in abolishing the glasses at some point, one might think of 3D in this sense remains. In the language of film, but it will not change anything, and lots of movies - The white tape for example - can be imagined in 3D do not, so there'll be probably both.
