Hi, I have set before my S-VHS recordings digitizer. As a converter, I bought the Canopus 300. Now I still need an S-VHS recorder, the tape of good quality einspeist. I have the Panasonic NVSV - 120, but does not have TB and I have in the forum already read several times that older recorders are better.
Could you give me maybe a recorder recommend the best quality of your opinion, has to make old recordings, the best out of?
What capture software recommends it - or is that no preference? Many greetings and thanks Jonas
Antwort von StefanS:
Outward and again on Ebay professional studio equipment, used and obsolete auctioned. The last that I have pursued a little, was a JVC S-VHS with TBC and Other and the device then went for about 450 Teuronon on the table.
Greeting Stefan
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Jonas,
I have learned that consumer good shots on Consumer recorders often better can be played back as on professional equipment (Mazen). The latter seems to expect a clean recording, but for consumer film is not present. With built-Vollbild TBCs then there may be an unpleasant Jerkiness.
I declare to me this way: consumer recorders often have only line TBCs and catch only a portion of the synchronization from imprecise. The rest is of an external full-TBC to create, such as the built-in ADVC-300.
Of the devices that play back to me of SVHS available is the Panasonic NV-FS200 most often as first choice. Maybe you have luck and yes can be a recorder in a sophisticated and efficient condition grab?
Antwort von Stefan:
The Canopus 300 has been an inside TBC.
There is, however, a Line Time Base Correction (LTBC) http://www.canopus.com/products/ADVC300/index.php
Aka LTBC Video Stabilizer in contrast to (Vollbild-/Frame-) TBC http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Base_Corrector http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timebase_correction
I doubt that a consumer S-VHS recorder with "TB" is more than Line Time Base Correction (LTBC) has. Frame TBC would be simply too expensive.
It can therefore conclude that JVC recorder with TBC LTBC also my (Incidentally, an interesting discussion) http://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1644654
Good luck The thick Stefan
Antwort von Markus:
"Stefan" wrote:
The Canopus 300 has been an inside TBC. There is, however, a Line Time Base Correction (LTBC)
True, I was not even aware. Apparently it is sufficient, however, because the digitized analog video 300 very clean.
Unless you try a similar disaster on the computer to get! Sometimes I'm surprised how a recording in terms of synchronization is only so vergeigen. ;-)
The videographers are familiar with the term safe: VHS-Master, and by analogy, without INTERMEDIARIES TBC in Assembleschnitt created. Grausam!
Antwort von almatic:
Hello Stefan and Markus, First Thanks for your answers! Do you know if the Panasonic NV-FS200 has a LTBC inside or a full TBC [means any digital wide tbc?]
Now a LTBC recorder so I think makes no sense, if the 300 is a Canopus LTBC in it, right?
Even at times of Capture Software: Is this absolutely no preference as to what is, or are you guys because Präferezen, which has the highest quality codec? Many greetings and thanks Jonas
Antwort von Markus:
"Jonas" wrote:
Do you know if the Panasonic NV-FS200 has a LTBC inside or a full [...] TBC?
The FS200 is only self-TBC and in the operating synonymous. But I think it is a LTBC.
Theoretically, it is pointless, two LTBCs row to switch, because the first line should be so all-Syncfehler have already been eliminated. In practice, however, so you can play quite well and there were tapes already, which I have with three TBCs (including 1x and 2x LTBC full-TBC) stabilizes. But it is a quite gefuddel and fortunately very rarely useful.
"Jonas" wrote:
[does that mean any digital wide tbc?]
Give a look in Google and look at the Results. ;-)
